Update (October 9, 2026): Trump calls anyone who says "AI" "THE ENEMY"
On Thursday, October 8, Trump escalated the rhetoric on Truth Social. AFP, as published by Arab News, quotes the post: "The White House considers anyone that uses the term, 'Artificial Intelligence,' as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, 'Super Intelligence,' THE ENEMY!" AFP notes he did not say what the consequences would be. Politico also reported the post; it is paywalled, so we rely on AFP's quotation.
What this changes: nothing legally. As described above, the order covers executive-branch documents only, and no rule binds companies, researchers or the press. The post is a signal, not a regulation, and it is not an official White House action we could find. Hacker News discussion of the story was thin when we checked (thread). Builders selling to federal agencies should still expect "Super Intelligence" in procurement language, as covered in the sections below.
Update — October 1, 2026: Full text and signature page for the Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities (White House Accord on Super Intelligence) — including the Unites States typo on Trump's line — are in explainx.ai's accord deep dive.
On September 29, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order telling federal agencies to stop saying "artificial intelligence" and start saying "Super Intelligence" (SI). The order, titled "Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence," is a vocabulary rule for the executive branch plus a 60-day request for legal definitions. It is not a new safety regime, and it does not touch model access, pricing, or export controls. A separate voluntary accord with major AI CEOs was signed September 30 and matters more for builders. This post separates what is confirmed from what is spin, and lists what to do if you build for or sell to the US government.
Some caution on sourcing: the White House pages are the primary documents, but this post also leans on wire and news summaries of them, so quoted language is attributed to the reporting rather than presented as verbatim order text. Check the official order and fact sheet before quoting.
TL;DR: the questions people asked after the signing
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What was signed? | Executive order "Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence," Sept 29, 2026 |
| What does it require? | Agencies use "Super Intelligence" / "SI" in correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, and other non-statutory documents; no longer acknowledge "AI" |
| Does it change the law? | No. SI has "the same meaning" as AI under existing law |
| What has a deadline? | The president's science adviser has 60 days to propose legislative language defining SI, including whether it should modify, expand, or supersede the legal definition of AI |
| Who must comply? | Executive-branch departments and agencies, not companies |
| What else happened that day? | A voluntary "Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities" with tech CEOs, called "morally binding" by Trump |
| Does it affect my API or model? | No |
| Will Congress follow? | Only if it passes a statute; nothing has been introduced as of publication |
What does the executive order actually say?
According to reporting on the order text, it directs all departments and agencies to use "Super Intelligence" and "SI" in official correspondence, public communications, policy documents, websites, reports, and non-statutory documents, and "to no longer acknowledge the terms 'Artificial Intelligence' or 'AI.'" The White House framing is that the change "recognize[s] the continuously advancing technological frontier and the limitless promise it offers the American people," and reflects advances since "artificial intelligence" was first used.
Three details matter more than the slogan:
- It is scoped to non-statutory documents. Existing laws and regulations that say "artificial intelligence" are not rewritten. The order states that SI has the same meaning as AI under current law, so a rule, grant, or contract keyed to the old term keeps working.
- It starts a 60-day drafting task. The Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, in consultation with agency heads, must submit proposed legislative language defining super intelligence, and assess whether it should modify, expand, or supersede the legal definition of AI. That is the part with real policy consequences, because a statutory definition decides which systems fall under which rules.
- It binds agencies, not the market. No company is required to relabel a model, product, or filing.
- Section 2(b) grandfathers history. Previously issued regulations, presidential actions, contracts, grants, and other historical documents do not have to be rewritten.
- Section 3(a) ties SI to existing statute. For this order, Super Intelligence means the technologies covered by artificial intelligence as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 9401(3) until Congress or a later action changes that.
That last point is the one most viral takes missed. The order changes how the federal government talks about the technology. It does not create new obligations for the private sector.
Why did the White House do this?
The stated reason is that "artificial" sounds less capable than the technology is. Trump made the same argument when he posted an X poll on September 19 offering Superior, Extreme, or Supreme Intelligence, which we covered in why the term AI has survived every rebrand since 1956. The order picks the plain "Super Intelligence" instead of any of the three poll options.
The rename had already been travelling through diplomacy before it was formalized. The Trump-Xi summit outcome included a named US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue and an incident channel, and US representatives have used "SI" in international settings. The order turns that informal usage into a domestic rule. It also arrives a few weeks before the midterms, and CNBC's reporting frames the move against polls showing majorities of Americans worried about AI and disapproving of how Trump has handled it.
What is the tech CEO accord?
The same day, Trump hosted leaders of major AI companies at the White House and announced a voluntary accord, reported under the title "Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities." Coverage describes:
- Four layers of controls and audits, including internal evaluations, an audit by an external firm, and review by each company's board of directors.
- Signatures from Trump and the heads of Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia, as listed in wire reports.
- Voluntary status. Asked if it was binding, Trump said: "I think it's morally binding." Signatories acknowledged that such measures could later become mandatory federal statute.
For builders, this is the more concrete signal. It is self-regulation with named audit steps, not enforcement. If you have followed the Frontier AI Act floor vote, the Rand Paul block on the kill-switch bill, and Vance's "build defenses, not regulation" line, this fits the administration's pattern: voluntary commitments and branding in place of statute.
Does "super intelligence" now mean something different?
This is the real technical objection. In AI research, superintelligence usually means a system that broadly exceeds human cognitive ability, and it is the subject of the safety debate. The models on the market today, including the Muse and Dots agents we compared, are not that by most researchers' definitions.
The order sidesteps the problem by legal fiat: SI "has the same meaning as" AI. But a label that means one thing in law and another in research invites confusion in three places:
| Context | Risk of the new label |
|---|---|
| Agency documents | A chatbot procurement is described as "super intelligence," which overstates capability |
| Research and safety policy | Safety thresholds written for superintelligence get applied, or ignored, for ordinary models |
| International talks | Partners that keep "AI" must translate; Canada's AI minister Evan Solomon reportedly said Canadians are not enthusiastic about renaming things |
Note that "SI" also collides with existing usage in other fields, and our earlier poll post noted two of Trump's three proposed names abbreviated to "SI" as well. The legislative definition due in 60 days is where the ambiguity will be settled, or made worse.
What should builders and vendors do?
If you sell to the federal government or write about it:
- Add "SI" as an alias, not a replacement. Keep "AI" as your primary term for search, SDK docs, and non-US buyers. Use "Super Intelligence (SI)" in federal-facing proposals once solicitations start using it.
- Watch the 60-day definition. Any statutory definition of SI that expands or replaces the AI definition could change which of your products fall under agency rules. Set a reminder for late November 2026.
- Do not rename models, APIs, or schemas. Nothing requires it, and breaking identifiers costs real money.
- Read contract language literally. Existing clauses say "artificial intelligence" and still apply. The order says SI means the same thing.
- Treat the accord as a checklist, not a law. If you are a frontier lab supplier, expect customers to ask about internal evals, external audits, and board review, because those are now publicly named.
- Do not confuse SI with .si domains. Slovenia's ccTLD is unrelated to Super Intelligence policy; see .si domains: safe buying and scam patterns if hype sends you to domain brokers.
For a longer policy background, see the US-EU AI regulation guide and our coverage of Trump and Johnson rejecting an AI pause.
Questions people are asking
Is this a real policy or a branding exercise?
Both. The vocabulary rule is a branding move with a real (small) administrative footprint. The 60-day definition task and the accord are the pieces that could have policy effect. Critics point to the timing, one day after the America.gov AI portal launch and around OpenAI DevDay, as evidence that the rename competes for headlines with more consequential news.
Will government websites really stop saying AI?
The order directs agencies to stop acknowledging the term, so expect it to disappear from press releases and agency pages first. Existing statutes, court filings, and international documents will keep "AI" because the order cannot rewrite them.
Can a company be penalized for saying AI?
No. The order applies to the executive branch's own communications.
How does this connect to the Trump-Xi "SI dialogue"?
It is the same vocabulary applied domestically. See our US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue post and the risk talks preview.
Honest limitations of this post
- We could not open the White House pages directly from our environment, so the order text is described through news and wire summaries. Confirm exact wording before quoting.
- Accord details (the four layers, signatory list) come from press summaries and may differ from the final signed document.
- No enforcement mechanism has been announced for either the order or the accord.
- Public reaction data (polls, foreign ministers' remarks) is as reported by outlets and unverified by us.
Related reading
-
Update — October 1, 2026: SSI teased an announcement — company name vs federal "SI" acronym are not the same event.
-
US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue: what the Trump-Xi outcome changes
-
White House Accord: Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities
Official: Executive order · Fact sheet
Details are accurate as of September 30, 2026 and based on news summaries of the White House documents. Legislative definitions and agency implementation may change in the 60-day window.