sql-optimization
Universal SQL performance optimization across MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, and other databases.
Works with
5
total installs
5
this week
28.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
5
installs
5
this week
28.7K
stars
What it does
Covers query analysis, index strategy design, subquery optimization, and JOIN tuning with before/after examples for each technique
Addresses common anti-patterns including SELECT *, function calls in WHERE clauses, inefficient pagination, and correlated subqueries
Provides database-agnostic guidance on batch operations, temporary tables, covering indexes, and partial indexes
I
Installation Guide
How to use sql-optimization on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
sql-optimization
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches sql-optimization from github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate sql-optimization. Access via /sql-optimization in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
SQL Performance Optimization Assistant
Expert SQL performance optimization for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on universal SQL optimization techniques that work across MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, and other SQL databases.
🎯 Core Optimization Areas
Query Performance Analysis
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient query patterns
SELECT * FROM orders o
WHERE YEAR(o.created_at) = 2024
AND o.customer_id IN (
SELECT c.id FROM customers c WHERE c.status = 'active'
);
-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized query with proper indexing hints
SELECT o.id, o.customer_id, o.total_amount, o.created_at
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id
WHERE o.created_at >= '2024-01-01'
AND o.created_at < '2025-01-01'
AND c.status = 'active';
-- Required indexes:
-- CREATE INDEX idx_orders_created_at ON orders(created_at);
-- CREATE INDEX idx_customers_status ON customers(status);
-- CREATE INDEX idx_orders_customer_id ON orders(customer_id);
Index Strategy Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Poor indexing strategy
CREATE INDEX idx_user_data ON users(email, first_name, last_name, created_at);
-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized composite indexing
-- For queries filtering by email first, then sorting by created_at
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email_created ON users(email, created_at);
-- For full-text name searches
CREATE INDEX idx_users_name ON users(last_name, first_name);
-- For user status queries
CREATE INDEX idx_users_status_created ON users(status, created_at)
WHERE status IS NOT NULL;
Subquery Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Correlated subquery
SELECT p.product_name, p.price
FROM products p
WHERE p.price > (
SELECT AVG(price)
FROM products p2
WHERE p2.category_id = p.category_id
);
-- ✅ GOOD: Window function approach
SELECT product_name, price
FROM (
SELECT product_name, price,
AVG(price) OVER (PARTITION BY category_id) as avg_category_price
FROM products
) ranked
WHERE price > avg_category_price;
📊 Performance Tuning Techniques
JOIN Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient JOIN order and conditions
SELECT o.*, c.name, p.product_name
FROM orders o
LEFT JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id
LEFT JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id
LEFT JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id
WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01'
AND c.status = 'active';
-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized JOIN with filtering
SELECT o.id, o.total_amount, c.name, p.product_name
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id AND c.status = 'active'
INNER JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id
INNER JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id
WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01';
Pagination Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: OFFSET-based pagination (slow for large offsets)
SELECT * FROM products
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 10000;
-- ✅ GOOD: Cursor-based pagination
SELECT * FROM products
WHERE created_at < '2024-06-15 10:30:00'
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20;
-- Or using ID-based cursor
SELECT * FROM products
WHERE id > 1000
ORDER BY id
LIMIT 20;
Aggregation Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Multiple separate aggregation queries
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'pending';
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'shipped';
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE status = 'delivered';
-- ✅ GOOD: Single query with conditional aggregation
SELECT
COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'pending' THEN 1 END) as pending_count,
COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'shipped' THEN 1 END) as shipped_count,
COUNT(CASE WHEN status = 'delivered' THEN 1 END) as delivered_count
FROM orders;
🔍 Query Anti-Patterns
SELECT Performance Issues
-- ❌ BAD: SELECT * anti-pattern
SELECT * FROM large_table lt
JOIN another_table at ON lt.id = at.ref_id;
-- ✅ GOOD: Explicit column selection
SELECT lt.id, lt.name, at.value
FROM large_table lt
JOIN another_table at ON lt.id = at.ref_id;
WHERE Clause Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Function calls in WHERE clause
SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE UPPER(customer_email) = '[email protected]';
-- ✅ GOOD: Index-friendly WHERE clause
SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE customer_email = '[email protected]';
-- Consider: CREATE INDEX idx_orders_email ON orders(LOWER(customer_email));
OR vs UNION Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Complex OR conditions
SELECT * FROM products
WHERE (category = 'electronics' AND price < 1000)
OR (category = 'books' AND price < 50);
-- ✅ GOOD: UNION approach for better optimization
SELECT * FROM products WHERE category = 'electronics' AND price < 1000
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM products WHERE category = List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Get started →Use Cases
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
premium-frontend-ui
178github/awesome-copilot
java-springboot
40github/awesome-copilot
grill-me
386mattpocock/skills
premortem
197parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
deslop
118cursor/plugins
framer-motion
98pproenca/dot-skills
Reviews
- AAisha Mehta★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for sql-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- HHassan Shah★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: sql-optimization is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- AAisha Robinson★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
sql-optimization is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
We added sql-optimization from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- PPratham Ware★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for sql-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- LLucas Liu★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
sql-optimization is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- IIshan Chawla★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
sql-optimization fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- MMateo Abbas★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sql-optimization is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- BBenjamin Perez★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sql-optimization is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ZZara Wang★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
We added sql-optimization from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 75
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.