Comprehensive testing strategy design covering unit, integration, E2E testing, and TDD practices.
Works with
Implements test pyramid structure with recommended ratios: 70% unit tests, 20% integration, 10% E2E tests
Provides Given-When-Then patterns for unit testing, mocking strategies for external dependencies, and API endpoint testing examples
Includes E2E testing guidance using Playwright for complete user flow validation and TDD red-green-refactor cycle methodology
Covers CI/CD integratio
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontesting-strategiesExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches testing-strategies from supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate testing-strategies. Access via /testing-strategies in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
3
total installs
3
this week
88
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
3
installs
3
this week
88
stars
/\
/E2E\ ← few (slow, expensive)
/______\
/ \
/Integration\ ← medium
/____________\
/ \
/ Unit Tests \ ← many (fast, inexpensive)
/________________\
Ratio guide:
Given-When-Then pattern:
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('should apply 10% discount for orders over $100', () => {
// Given: setup
const order = { total: 150, customerId: '123' };
// When: perform action
const discount = calculateDiscount(order);
// Then: verify result
expect(discount).toBe(15);
});
it('should not apply discount for orders under $100', () => {
const order = { total: 50, customerId: '123' };
const discount = calculateDiscount(order);
expect(discount).toBe(0);
});
it('should throw error for invalid order', () => {
const order = { total: -10, customerId: '123' };
expect(() => calculateDiscount(order)).toThrow('Invalid order');
});
});
Mocking strategy:
// Mock external dependencies
jest.mock('../services/emailService');
import { sendEmail } from '../services/emailService';
describe('UserService', () => {
it('should send welcome email on registration', async () => {
// Arrange
const mockSendEmail = sendEmail as jest.MockedFunction<typeof sendEmail>;
mockSendEmail.mockResolvedValueOnce(true);
// Act
await userService.register({ email: '[email protected]', password: 'pass' });
// Assert
expect(mockSendEmail).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
to: '[email protected]',
subject: 'Welcome!',
body: expect.any(String)
});
});
});
API endpoint tests:
describe('POST /api/users', () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
await db.user.deleteMany(); // Clean DB
});
it('should create user with valid data', async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/users')
.send({
email: '[email protected]',
username: 'testuser',
password: 'Password123!'
});
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body.user).toMatchObject({
email: '[email protected]',
username: 'testuser'
});
// Verify it was actually saved to the DB
const user = await db.user.findUnique({ where: { email: '[email protected]' } });
expect(user).toBeTruthy();
});
it('should reject duplicate email', async () => {
// Create first user
await request(app)
.post('/api/users')
.send({ email: '[email protected]', username: 'user1', password: 'Pass123!' });
// Attempt duplicate
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/users')
.send({ email: '[email protected]', username: 'user2', password: 'Pass123!' });
expect(response.status).toBe(409);
});
});
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
test.describe('User Registration Flow', () => {
test('should complete full registration process', async ({ page }) => {
// 1. Visit homepage
await page.goto('http://localhost:3000');
// 2. Click Sign Up button
await page.click('text=Sign Up')Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
web-accessibility
62supercent-io/skills-template
Productivitysame repopptx-presentation-builder
29supercent-io/skills-template
Frontendsame reporemotion-video-production
9supercent-io/skills-template
Videosame repocode-refactoring
9supercent-io/skills-template
Productivitysame reposecurity-best-practices
6supercent-io/skills-template
Productivitysame repooh-my-codex
6supercent-io/skills-template
Productivitysame repoReviews
4.7★★★★★72 reviews- JJames Bhatia★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
testing-strategies fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
testing-strategies fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- NNikhil Tandon★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
We added testing-strategies from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- XXiao Perez★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
Keeps context tight: testing-strategies is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- MMia Gill★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for testing-strategies matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- LLiam Smith★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
testing-strategies reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- OOlivia Reddy★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
I recommend testing-strategies for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- HHenry Bhatia★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
testing-strategies is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
testing-strategies is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- MMia Ghosh★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
testing-strategies has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 72
1 / 8Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.