file-organization
Establish scalable project structures with standardized naming conventions and folder organization patterns.
Works with
1
total installs
1
this week
88
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
88
stars
What it does
Provides templates for React/Next.js frontends, Node.js/Express backends, and feature-based large-scale applications with clear separation of concerns
Defines naming conventions for files (PascalCase components, camelCase utilities, UPPER_SNAKE_CASE constants), folders (kebab-case or camelCase), and variables (with is/has/can prefixes for booleans)
Includes best practices for
Installation Guide
How to use file-organization on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
file-organization
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches file-organization from supercent-io/skills-template and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate file-organization. Access via /file-organization in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Project File Organization
When to use this skill
- New Projects: Initial folder structure design
- Project Growth: Refactoring when complexity increases
- Team Standardization: Establish consistent structure
Instructions
Step 1: React/Next.js Project Structure
src/
├── app/ # Next.js 13+ App Router
│ ├── (auth)/ # Route groups
│ │ ├── login/
│ │ └── signup/
│ ├── (dashboard)/
│ │ ├── layout.tsx
│ │ ├── page.tsx
│ │ └── settings/
│ ├── api/ # API routes
│ │ ├── auth/
│ │ └── users/
│ └── layout.tsx
│
├── components/ # UI Components
│ ├── ui/ # Reusable UI (Button, Input)
│ │ ├── Button/
│ │ │ ├── Button.tsx
│ │ │ ├── Button.test.tsx
│ │ │ └── index.ts
│ │ └── Input/
│ ├── layout/ # Layout components (Header, Footer)
│ ├── features/ # Feature-specific components
│ │ ├── auth/
│ │ └── dashboard/
│ └── shared/ # Shared across features
│
├── lib/ # Utilities & helpers
│ ├── utils.ts
│ ├── hooks/
│ │ ├── useAuth.ts
│ │ └── useLocalStorage.ts
│ └── api/
│ └── client.ts
│
├── store/ # State management
│ ├── slices/
│ │ ├── authSlice.ts
│ │ └── userSlice.ts
│ └── index.ts
│
├── types/ # TypeScript types
│ ├── api.ts
│ ├── models.ts
│ └── index.ts
│
├── config/ # Configuration
│ ├── env.ts
│ └── constants.ts
│
└── styles/ # Global styles
├── globals.css
└── theme.ts
Step 2: Node.js/Express Backend Structure
src/
├── api/ # API layer
│ ├── routes/
│ │ ├── auth.routes.ts
│ │ ├── user.routes.ts
│ │ └── index.ts
│ ├── controllers/
│ │ ├── auth.controller.ts
│ │ └── user.controller.ts
│ └── middlewares/
│ ├── auth.middleware.ts
│ ├── errorHandler.ts
│ └── validation.ts
│
├── services/ # Business logic
│ ├── auth.service.ts
│ ├── user.service.ts
│ └── email.service.ts
│
├── repositories/ # Data access layer
│ ├── user.repository.ts
│ └── session.repository.ts
│
├── models/ # Database models
│ ├── User.ts
│ └── Session.ts
│
├── database/ # Database setup
│ ├── connection.ts
│ ├── migrations/
│ └── seeds/
│
├── utils/ # Utilities
│ ├── logger.ts
│ ├── crypto.ts
│ └── validators.ts
│
├── config/ # Configuration
│ ├── index.ts
│ ├── database.ts
│ └── env.ts
│
├── types/ # TypeScript types
│ ├── express.d.ts
│ └── models.ts
│
├── __tests__/ # Tests
│ ├── unit/
│ ├── integration/
│ └── e2e/
│
└── index.ts # Entry point
Step 3: Feature-Based Structure (Large-Scale Apps)
src/
├── features/
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── components/
│ │ │ ├── LoginForm.tsx
│ │ │ └── SignupForm.tsx
│ │ ├── hooks/
│ │ │ └── useAuth.ts
│ │ ├── api/
│ │ │ └── authApi.ts
│ │ ├── store/
│ │ │ └── authSlice.ts
│ │ ├── types/
│ │ │ └── auth.types.ts
│ │ └── index.ts
│ │
│ ├── products/
│ │ ├── components/
│ │ ├── hooks/
│ │ ├── api/
│ │ └── types/
│ │
│ └── orders/
│
├── shared/ # Shared across features
│ ├── components/
│ ├── hooks/
│ ├── utils/
│ └── types/
│
└── core/ # App-wide
├── store/
├── router/
└── config/
Step 4: Naming Conventions
File Names:
Components: PascalCase.tsx
Hooks: camelCase.ts (useAuth.ts)
Utils: camelCase.ts (formatDate.ts)
Constants: UPPER_SNAKE_CASE.ts (API_ENDPOINTS.ts)
Types: camelCase.types.ts (user.types.ts)
Tests: *.test.ts, *.spec.ts
Folder Names:
kebab-case: user-profile/
camelCase: userProfile/ (optional: hooks/, utils/)
PascalCase: UserProfile/ (optional: components/)
✅ Consistency is key (entire team uses the same rules)
Variable/Function Names:
// Components: PascalCase
const UserProfile = () => {};
// Functions: camelCase
function getUserById() {}
// Constants: UPPER_SNAKE_CASE
const API_BASE_URL = 'https://api.example.com';
// Private: _prefix (optional)
class User {
private _id: string;
private _hashPassword() {}
}
// Booleans: is/has/can prefix
const isAuthenticated = true;
const hasPermission = false;
const canEdit = true;
Step 5: index.ts Barrel Files
components/ui/index.ts:
// ✅ Good example: Re-export named exports
export { Button } from './Button/Button';
export { Input } from './Input/Input';
export { Modal } from './Modal/Modal';
// Usage:
import { Button, Input } from '@/components/ui';
❌ Bad example:
// Re-export everything (impairs tree-shaking)
export * from './Button';
export * from './Input';
Output format
Project Template
my-app/
├── .github/
│ └── workflows/
├── public/
├── src/
│ ├── app/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── lib/
│ ├── types/
│ └── config/
├── tests/
├── docs/
├── scripts/
├── .env.example
├── .gitignore
├── .eslintrc.json
├── .prettierrc
├── tsconfig.json
├── package.json
└── README.md
Constraints
Required Rules (MUST)
- Consistency: Entire team uses the same rules
- Clear Folder Names: Roles must be explicit
- Max Depth: Recommend 5 levels or fewer
Prohibited (MUST NOT)
- Excessive Nesting: Avoid 7+ levels of folder depth
- Vague Names: Avoid utils2/, helpers/, misc/
- Circular Dependencies: Prohibit A → B → A references
Best practices
- Colocation: Keep related files close (component + styles + tests)
- Feature-Based: Modularize by feature
- Path Aliases: Simplify imports with
@/
tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"@/*": ["./src/*"],
"@/components/*": ["./src/components/*"],
"@/lib/*": ["./src/lib/*"]
}
}
}
Usage:
// ❌ Bad example
import { Button } from '../../../components/ui/Button';
// ✅ Good example
import { Button } from '@/components/ui';
References
Metadata
Version
- Current Version: 1.0.0
- Last Updated: 2025-01-01
- Compatible Platforms: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini
Tags
#file-organization #project-structure #folder-structure #naming-conventions #utilities
Examples
Example 1: Basic usage
Example 2: Advanced usage
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
web-accessibility
56supercent-io/skills-template
grill-me
387mattpocock/skills
premortem
197parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
deslop
118cursor/plugins
framer-motion
99pproenca/dot-skills
write-a-prd
91mattpocock/skills
Reviews
- LLiam Desai★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: file-organization is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLiam Sethi★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: file-organization is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- LLayla Chawla★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
We added file-organization from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- YYusuf Dixit★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in file-organization — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- KKwame Nasser★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
file-organization is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- LLiam Nasser★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
file-organization has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- YYuki Yang★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
I recommend file-organization for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- LLayla Perez★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
file-organization has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- HHenry Chawla★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
file-organization fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- LLayla Agarwal★★★★★Oct 2, 2024
Useful defaults in file-organization — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 39
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.