fix-review

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill fix-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Verify that fix commits properly address audit findings without introducing new bugs or security vulnerabilities.

skill.md

Fix Review

Overview

Verify that fix commits properly address audit findings without introducing new bugs or security vulnerabilities.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs.

Use this skill when:

  • Reviewing commits that address security audit findings
  • Verifying that fixes don't introduce new vulnerabilities
  • Ensuring code changes properly resolve identified issues
  • Validating that remediation efforts are complete and correct

Instructions

This skill helps verify that fix commits properly address audit findings:

  1. Review Fix Commits: Analyze commits that claim to fix audit findings
  2. Verify Resolution: Ensure the original issue is properly addressed
  3. Check for Regressions: Verify no new bugs or vulnerabilities are introduced
  4. Validate Completeness: Ensure all aspects of the finding are resolved

Review Process

When reviewing fix commits:

  1. Compare the fix against the original audit finding
  2. Verify the fix addresses the root cause, not just symptoms
  3. Check for potential side effects or new issues
  4. Validate that tests cover the fixed scenario
  5. Ensure no similar vulnerabilities exist elsewhere

Best Practices

  • Review fixes in context of the full codebase
  • Verify test coverage for the fixed issue
  • Check for similar patterns that might need fixing
  • Ensure fixes follow security best practices
  • Document the resolution approach

Resources

For more information, see the source repository.

how to use fix-review

How to use fix-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add fix-review
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill fix-review

The skills CLI fetches fix-review from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/fix-review

Reload or restart Cursor to activate fix-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /fix-review) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.535 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024

    fix-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Diego Martinez· Dec 12, 2024

    fix-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Olivia Rahman· Dec 4, 2024

    We added fix-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Isabella Abebe· Nov 23, 2024

    fix-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024

    Registry listing for fix-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Diego Smith· Nov 3, 2024

    Registry listing for fix-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Noah Anderson· Oct 14, 2024

    Registry listing for fix-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 2, 2024

    fix-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Omar Lopez· Sep 17, 2024

    Keeps context tight: fix-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Omar Haddad· Aug 8, 2024

    fix-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 35

1 / 4