Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondeployment-pipeline-designExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches deployment-pipeline-design from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate deployment-pipeline-design. Access via /deployment-pipeline-design in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
30.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
30.9K
stars
Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows.
┌─────────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Build │ → │ Test │ → │ Staging │ → │ Approve│ → │Production│
└─────────┘ └──────┘ └─────────┘ └────────┘ └──────────┘
# GitHub Actions
production-deploy:
needs: staging-deploy
environment:
name: production
url: https://app.example.com
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Deploy to production
run: |
# Deployment commands
# GitLab CI
deploy:production:
stage: deploy
script:
- deploy.sh production
environment:
name: production
when: delayed
start_in: 30 minutes
only:
- main
# Azure Pipelines
stages:
- stage: Production
dependsOn: Staging
jobs:
- deployment: Deploy
environment:
name: production
resourceType: Kubernetes
strategy:
runOnce:
preDeploy:
steps:
- task: ManualValidation@0
inputs:
notifyUsers: '[email protected]'
instructions: 'Review staging metrics before approving'
Reference: See assets/approval-gate-template.yml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 10
strategy:
type: RollingUpdate
rollingUpdate:
maxSurge: 2
maxUnavailable: 1
Characteristics:
# Blue (current)
kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml
kubectl label service my-app version=blue
# Green (new)
kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml
# Test green environment
kubectl label service my-app version=green
# Rollback if needed
kubectl label service my-app version=blue
Characteristics:
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Rollout
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 10
strategy:
canary:
steps:
- setWeight: 10
- pause: {duration: 5m}
- setWeight: 25
- pause: {duration: 5m}
- setWeight: 50
- pause: {duration: 5m}
- setWeight: 100
Characteristics:
from flagsmith import Flagsmith
flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY")
if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"):
# New code path
process_checkout_v2()
else:
# Existing code path
process_checkout_v1()
Characteristics:
name: Production Pipeline
on:
push:
branches: [ main ]
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build application
run: make build
- name: Build Docker image
run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} .
- name: Push to registry
run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }}
test:
needs: build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Unit tests
run: make test
- name: Security scan
run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }}
deploy-staging:
needs: test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
environment:
name: staging
steps:
- name: Deploy to staging
run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/
integration-test:
needs: deploy-staging
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Run E2E tests
run: npm run test:e2e
deploy-production:
needs: integration-test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
environment:
name: production
steps:
- name: Canary deployment
run: |
kubectl apply -f k8s/production/
kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app
verify:
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
antigravity-design-expert
209sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Frontendsame repofrontend-design
662anthropics/claude-code
Frontendtag: designhigh-end-visual-design
193leonxlnx/taste-skill
Frontendtag: designinterior-design-expert
145erichowens/some_claude_skills
Frontendtag: designtui-design
105hyperb1iss/hyperskills
Frontendtag: designgame-ui-design
64omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
Frontendtag: designReviews
4.6★★★★★75 reviews- PPratham Ware★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: deployment-pipeline-design is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- AAanya Kim★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
We added deployment-pipeline-design from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- KKabir Okafor★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
deployment-pipeline-design is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- HHarper Zhang★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
deployment-pipeline-design reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- CChen Martinez★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
deployment-pipeline-design fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAditi Bhatia★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for deployment-pipeline-design matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
deployment-pipeline-design has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- IIsabella Gupta★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
deployment-pipeline-design reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- KKabir Nasser★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: deployment-pipeline-design is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- HHarper Smith★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
We added deployment-pipeline-design from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 75
1 / 8Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.