Universal coding standards and best practices for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js projects.
Works with
Covers core principles (readability, KISS, DRY, YAGNI) with practical code examples showing good vs. bad patterns
Includes TypeScript/JavaScript standards for naming, immutability, error handling, async/await, and type safety
Provides React-specific guidance on component structure, custom hooks, state management, and conditional rendering
Details API design conventions, REST endp
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncoding-standardsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches coding-standards from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate coding-standards. Access via /coding-standards in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
31.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
31.1K
stars
Universal coding standards applicable across all projects.
// ✅ GOOD: Descriptive names
const marketSearchQuery = 'election'
const isUserAuthenticated = true
const totalRevenue = 1000
// ❌ BAD: Unclear names
const q = 'election'
const flag = true
const x = 1000
// ✅ GOOD: Verb-noun pattern
async function fetchMarketData(marketId: string) { }
function calculateSimilarity(a: number[], b: number[]) { }
function isValidEmail(email: string): boolean { }
// ❌ BAD: Unclear or noun-only
async function market(id: string) { }
function similarity(a, b) { }
function email(e) { }
// ✅ ALWAYS use spread operator
const updatedUser = {
...user,
name: 'New Name'
}
const updatedArray = [...items, newItem]
// ❌ NEVER mutate directly
user.name = 'New Name' // BAD
items.push(newItem) // BAD
// ✅ GOOD: Comprehensive error handling
async function fetchData(url: string) {
try {
const response = await fetch(url)
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP ${response.status}: ${response.statusText}`)
}
return await response.json()
} catch (error) {
console.error('Fetch failed:', error)
throw new Error('Failed to fetch data')
}
}
// ❌ BAD: No error handling
async function fetchData(url) {
const response = await fetch(url)
return response.json()
}
// ✅ GOOD: Parallel execution when possible
const [users, markets, stats] = await Promise.all([
fetchUsers(),
fetchMarkets(),
fetchStats()
])
// ❌ BAD: Sequential when unnecessary
const users = await fetchUsers()
const markets = await fetchMarkets()
const stats = await fetchStats()
// ✅ GOOD: Proper types
interface Market {
id: string
name: string
status: 'active' | 'resolved' | 'closed'
created_at: Date
}
function getMarket(id: string): Promise<Market> {
// Implementation
}
// ❌ BAD: Using 'any'
function getMarket(id: any): Promise<any> {
// Implementation
}
// ✅ GOOD: Functional component with types
interface ButtonProps {
children: React.ReactNode
onClick: () => void
disabled?: boolean
variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary'
}
export function Button({
children,
onClick,
disabled = false,
variant = 'primary'
}: ButtonProps) {
return (
<button
onClick={onClick}
disabled={disabled}
className={`btn btn-${variant}`}
>
{children}
</button>
)
}
// ❌ BAD: No types, unclear structure
export function Button(props) {
return <button onClick={props.onClick}>{props.children}</button>
}
// ✅ GOOD: Reusable custom hook
export function useDebounce<T>(value: T, delay: number): T {
const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState<T>(value)
useEffect(() => {
const handler = setTimeout(() => {
setDebouncedValue(value)
}, delay)
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: coding-standards is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
coding-standards has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend coding-standards for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
coding-standards fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
coding-standards reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend coding-standards for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
coding-standards reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: coding-standards is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added coding-standards from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: coding-standards is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 53