Universal code quality tool supporting 70+ linters for 40+ languages via qlty CLI.
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example: Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example: Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example: Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example: Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 --skill qlty-checkCompatible with
Supported agents
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionqlty-checkExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 --skill qlty-checkFetches qlty-check from parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/qlty-check
Restart Cursor to activate qlty-check. Access via /qlty-checkin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Time estimate: 30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Prerequisites
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
nutritional-specialist
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills · Productivity · same category
framer-motion
pproenca/dot-skills · Productivity · same category
wordpress-elementor
jezweb/claude-skills · Productivity · same category
powerpoint
igorwarzocha/opencode-workflows · Productivity · same category
nestjs-best-practices
kadajett/agent-nestjs-skills · Productivity · same category
xauusd-trading
huynguyen03dev/xauusd-trading · Productivity · same category
qlty-check has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
qlty-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
qlty-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
qlty-check is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in qlty-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for qlty-check matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qlty-check is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: qlty-check is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for qlty-check matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
qlty-check reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 40