This guide explains how to add line-specific review comments to pull requests using the GitHub CLI (gh) API or mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment if it not available, similar to how the GitHub UI allows commenting on specific lines of code.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiongit:attach-review-to-prExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches git:attach-review-to-pr from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate git:attach-review-to-pr. Access via /git:attach-review-to-pr in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
765
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
765
stars
This guide explains how to add line-specific review comments to pull requests using the GitHub CLI (gh) API or mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment if it not available, similar to how the GitHub UI allows commenting on specific lines of code.
If available, use the mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment MCP tool for posting line-specific inline comments on pull requests. This approach provides better integration with GitHub's UI and is the recommended method.
Fallback: If the MCP tool is not available, use the GitHub CLI (gh) API methods described below:
/comments endpoint (see Adding a Single Line-Specific Comment)/reviews endpoint (see Adding Multiple Line-Specific Comments Together)While gh pr review provides basic review functionality (approve, request changes, general comments), it does not support line-specific comments directly. To add comments on specific lines of code, you must use the lower-level gh api command to call GitHub's REST API directly.
GitHub CLI installed and authenticated:
gh auth status
Access to the repository and pull request you want to review
GitHub has two types of PR comments:
Review comments can be added in two ways:
/pulls/{pr}/comments endpoint/pulls/{pr}/reviews endpointgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
-f body='Your comment text here' \
-f commit_id='<commit-sha>' \
-f path='path/to/file.js' \
-F line=42 \
-f side='RIGHT'
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
body |
string | Yes | The text of the review comment (supports Markdown) |
commit_id |
string | Yes | The SHA of the commit to comment on |
path |
string | Yes | Relative path to the file being commented on |
line |
integer | Yes | The line number in the diff (use -F for integers) |
side |
string | Yes | RIGHT for new/modified lines, LEFT for deleted lines |
start_line |
integer | No | For multi-line comments, the starting line |
start_side |
string | No | For multi-line comments, the starting side |
-f (--field) - For string values-F (--field) - For integer values (note the capital F)# First, get the latest commit SHA for the PR
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4 --jq '.head.sha'
# Then add your comment
gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/comments \
-f body='Consider adding error handling here. Should we confirm the lesson was successfully marked as completed before navigating away?' \
-f commit_id='e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4' \
-f path='src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx' \
-F line=26 \
-f side='RIGHT'
The line parameter refers to the position in the diff, not the absolute line number in the file:
start_line and line to specify the rangeOn success, returns a JSON object with comment details:
{
"id": 2532291222,
"pull_request_review_id": 3470545909,
"path": "src/components/LessonNavigationButtons.tsx",
"line": 26,
"body": "Consider adding error handling here...",
"html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#discussion_r2532291222",
"created_at": "2025-11-16T22:40:46Z"
}
To add multiple comments across different files in a single review, use the /reviews endpoint with JSON input.
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews --input -
{
"event": "COMMENT",
"body": "Overall review summary (optional)",
"comments": [
{
"path": "file1.tsx",
"body": "Comment on file 1",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 15
},
{
"path": "file2.tsx",
"body": "Comment on file 2",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 30
}
]
}
EOF
| Event | Description | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
COMMENT |
General review comment | Just leaving feedback without approval |
APPROVE |
Approve the PR | Changes look good, ready to merge |
REQUEST_CHANGES |
Request changes | Issues that must be fixed before merge |
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pulls/4/reviews --input -
{
"event": "COMMENT",
"body": "Testing multiple line-specific comments via gh api",
"comments": [
{
"path": "src/components/CourseCard.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 15
},
{
"path": "src/components/CourseProgressWidget.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 30
},
{
"path": "src/components/LessonProgressTracker.tsx",
"body": "Test comment generated by Claude",
"side": "RIGHT",
"line": 20
}
]
}
EOF
{
"id": 3470546747,
"state": "COMMENTED",
"html_url": "https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/learning-platform-app/pull/4#pullrequestreview-3470546747",
"submitted_at": "2025-11-16T22:42:43Z",
"commit_id": "e152d0dd6cf498467eadbeb638bf05abe11c64d4"
}
Error Message:
gh: Validation Failed (HTTP 422)
{"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequestReview","code":"custom","field":"user_id","message":"user_id can only have one pending review per pull request"}]}
Cause: GitHub only allows one pending (unsubmitted) review per user per PR. If you previously started a review through the UI or API and didn't submit it, it blocks new review creation.
Solution 1: Submit the pending review
# Check for pending reviews
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews | jq '.[] | select(.state=="PENDING")'
# Submit it through the UI or ask the user to submit it
Solution 2: Use the single comment endpoint instead
# Add individual comments without creating a review
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments \
-f body='Comment text' \
-f commit_id='<sha>' \
-f path='file.tsx' \
-F line=26 \
-f side='RIGHT'
Failed Attempt:
# This does NOT work - GitHub API receives an object, not an array
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews \
--raw-field 'comments[0][path]=file1.tsx' \
--raw-field 'comments[0][line]=15' \
--raw-field 'comments[1][path]=file2.tsx' \
--raw-field 'comments[1][line]=30'
Error:
Invalid request. For 'properties/comments', {"0" => {...}, "1" => {...}} is not an array.
Solution: Use JSON input via heredoc:
cat <<'EOF' | gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews --input -
{
"comments": [...]
}
EOF
Error Message:
Pull request review thread line must be part of the diff
Cause: The line number doesn't exist in the diff for this file.
Solutions:
commit_id (the latest commit in the PR)Error Message:
commit_sha is not part of the pull request
Solution: Get the latest commit SHA:
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Registry listing for git:attach-review-to-pr matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: git:attach-review-to-pr is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
git:attach-review-to-pr has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend git:attach-review-to-pr for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
git:attach-review-to-pr reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git:attach-review-to-pr is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
git:attach-review-to-pr reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: git:attach-review-to-pr is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
git:attach-review-to-pr fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
git:attach-review-to-pr has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 67