domain-architecture▌
kostja94/marketing-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Guides domain structure decisions for multiple products or brands: subfolder (subdirectory), subdomain, or independent domain. Covers brand architecture (Branded House vs House of Brands) and Hub-Spoke principles when multiple domains coexist. See domain-selection for initial domain choice (Brand/PMD/EMD, TLD); website-structure for single-domain page planning; rebranding-strategy for domain change and migration; multi-domain-brand-seo for brand search optimization.
Strategy: Domain Architecture
Guides domain structure decisions for multiple products or brands: subfolder (subdirectory), subdomain, or independent domain. Covers brand architecture (Branded House vs House of Brands) and Hub-Spoke principles when multiple domains coexist. See domain-selection for initial domain choice (Brand/PMD/EMD, TLD); website-structure for single-domain page planning; rebranding-strategy for domain change and migration; multi-domain-brand-seo for brand search optimization.
When invoking: On first use, if helpful, open with 1–2 sentences on what this skill covers and why it matters, then provide the main output. On subsequent use or when the user asks to skip, go directly to the main output.
Initial Assessment
Check for project context first: If .claude/project-context.md or .cursor/project-context.md exists, read it for product portfolio and growth goals.
Identify:
- Product count: Single product vs multiple products/brands
- Brand strategy: Unified brand vs distinct brands
- Current state: Planning from scratch vs consolidating existing domains
- Constraints: Tech stack, team, budget
Domain Structure Options
| Structure | Example | SEO Authority | Brand Independence | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subfolder | company.com/product-a | Shared with main domain | Low | Products under one brand; SMB; content consolidation |
| Subdomain | product.company.com | Treated separately by Google | Medium | Separate product experience; tech isolation; support/docs |
| Independent domain | product.ai | None shared | High | Acquired brands; different markets; distinct brand identity |
When to Use Each
| Choose | When |
|---|---|
| Subfolder | Products share value proposition; want to strengthen main domain; SMB; blog, tools, features under one brand |
| Subdomain | Need separate tech stack (e.g., app vs marketing); support portal; docs; distinct UX but same brand |
| Independent domain | House of Brands; acquired company; different audience; different TLD (e.g., .ai for AI product) |
SEO consensus: Subfolders typically outperform subdomains for most cases—authority flows to the main domain. Subdomains require separate SEO effort.
Brand Architecture
| Model | Description | Domain Tendency | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branded House | One master brand; products use functional descriptors | Subfolder or subdomain | Google (google.com/search, google.com/maps), FedEx |
| House of Brands | Each brand independent; parent hidden | Independent domains | Unilever (dove.com, axe.com) |
| Sub-brands / Endorsed | Sub-brands with parent endorsement | Subdomain or independent | FedEx Express, Marriott Bonvoy |
Decision factors: Business strategy, market positioning, product overlap, resource availability.
Hub-Spoke (Multiple Domains Coexist)
When company main site (company.com) and product site (product.ai) both exist:
| Role | Domain | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Hub | company.com | Brand, About, Research, product matrix; brand queries |
| Spoke | product.ai | Product features, pricing, signup; product queries |
Principles:
- Hub links to Spoke (Products section); Spoke links back (About, Footer, "A [Company] product")
- Spoke avoids competing for brand queries in Title; Hub avoids competing for product keywords
- See multi-domain-brand-seo for brand search optimization.
Output Format
- Recommendation (subfolder / subdomain / independent) with rationale
- Brand architecture fit (Branded House / House of Brands / Sub-brands)
- Domain mapping (e.g., product A → company.com/product-a)
- Hub-Spoke guidance (if multiple domains)
- Related next steps (website-structure, rebranding-strategy)
Related Skills
- domain-selection: Initial domain choice (Brand/PMD/EMD, TLD); single-site use case
- website-structure: Plan pages within a domain; single-domain structure
- rebranding-strategy: Domain change, 301 redirects, migration
- multi-domain-brand-seo: Brand search control when Hub and Spoke coexist
- branding: Brand strategy, positioning; domain architecture implements brand structure
How to use domain-architecture on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add domain-architecture
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches domain-architecture from GitHub repository kostja94/marketing-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate domain-architecture. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /domain-architecture) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★41 reviews- ★★★★★Ren Choi· Dec 12, 2024
domain-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: domain-architecture is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Arya Abbas· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend domain-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for domain-architecture matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Arya Ramirez· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: domain-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★William Park· Nov 3, 2024
Useful defaults in domain-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Arya Anderson· Oct 26, 2024
Keeps context tight: domain-architecture is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ava Tandon· Oct 22, 2024
I recommend domain-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 18, 2024
domain-architecture reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Agarwal· Oct 18, 2024
domain-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 41