nextjs-code-review

Evaluates Next.js App Router code against best practices for Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, and production-readiness criteria. Produces actionable findings categorized by severity with concrete code examples. Delegates to typescript-software-architect-review agent for architectural analysis.

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

8

total installs

8

this week

194

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill nextjs-code-review

8

installs

8

this week

194

stars

Installation Guide

How to use nextjs-code-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add nextjs-code-review
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill nextjs-code-review

Fetches nextjs-code-review from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/nextjs-code-review

Restart Cursor to activate nextjs-code-review. Access via /nextjs-code-review in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

Next.js Code Review

Overview

Evaluates Next.js App Router code against best practices for Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, and production-readiness criteria. Produces actionable findings categorized by severity with concrete code examples. Delegates to typescript-software-architect-review agent for architectural analysis.

When to Use

  • Reviewing Next.js pages, layouts, and route segments before merging
  • Validating Server Component vs Client Component boundaries
  • Checking Server Actions for security and correctness
  • Reviewing data fetching patterns (fetch, cache, revalidation)
  • Evaluating caching strategies (static generation, ISR, dynamic rendering)
  • Assessing middleware implementations (authentication, redirects, rewrites)
  • Reviewing API route handlers for proper request/response handling
  • Validating metadata configuration for SEO
  • Checking loading, error, and not-found page implementations
  • After implementing new Next.js features or migrating from Pages Router

Instructions

  1. Identify Scope: Determine which Next.js route segments and components are under review. Use glob to discover page.tsx, layout.tsx, loading.tsx, error.tsx, route.ts, and middleware.ts files.

  2. Analyze Component Boundaries: Verify proper Server Component / Client Component separation. Check that 'use client' is placed only where necessary and as deep in the component tree as possible. Ensure Server Components don't import client-only modules.

  3. Review Data Fetching: Validate fetch patterns — check for proper cache and revalidate options, parallel data fetching with Promise.all, and avoidance of request waterfalls. Verify that server-side data fetching doesn't expose sensitive data to the client.

  4. Evaluate Caching Strategy: Review static vs dynamic rendering decisions. Check generateStaticParams usage for static generation, revalidatePath/revalidateTag for on-demand revalidation, and proper cache headers for API routes.

  5. Assess Server Actions: Review form actions for proper validation (both client and server-side), error handling, optimistic updates with useOptimistic, and security (ensure actions don't expose sensitive operations without authorization).

  6. Check Middleware: Review middleware for proper request matching, authentication/authorization logic, response modification, and performance impact. Verify it runs only on necessary routes.

  7. Review Metadata & SEO: Check generateMetadata functions, Open Graph tags, structured data, robots.txt, and sitemap.xml configurations. Verify dynamic metadata is properly implemented for pages with variable content.

  8. Validate Findings: Before finalizing, verify each issue by checking the actual code context. Confirm the pattern violation exists, ensure the suggested fix is applicable to the codebase, and remove any false positives.

  9. Produce Review Report: Generate a structured report with severity-classified findings (Critical, Warning, Suggestion), positive observations, and prioritized recommendations with code examples.

Examples

Example 1: Server/Client Component Boundaries

// ❌ Bad: Entire page marked as client when only a button needs interactivity
'use client';

export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {
  const product = await fetch(`/api/products/${params.id}`);
  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{product.name}</h1>
      <p>{product.description}</p>
      <button onClick={() => addToCart(product.id)}>Add to Cart</button>
    </div>
  );
}

// ✅ Good: Server Component with isolated Client Component
// app/products/[id]/page.tsx (Server Component)
import { AddToCartButton } from './add-to-cart-button';

export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: Promise<{ id: string }> }) {
  const { id } = await params;
  const product = await getProduct(id);

  return (
    <div>
      <h1>{product.name}</h1>
      <p>{product.description}</p>
      <AddToCartButton productId={product.id} />
    </div>
  );
}

// app/products/[id]/add-to-cart-button.tsx (Client Component)
'use client';

export function AddToCartButton({ productId }: { productId: string }) {
  return <button onClick={() => addToCart(productId)}>Add to Cart</button>;
}

Example 2: Data Fetching Patterns

// ❌ Bad: Sequential data fetching creates waterfall
export default async function DashboardPage() {
  const user = await getUser();
  const orders = await getOrders(user.id);
  const analytics = await getAnalytics(user.id);
  return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}

// ✅ Good: Parallel data fetching with proper Suspense boundaries
export default async function DashboardPage() {
  const user = await getUser();
  const [orders, analytics] = await Promise.all([
    getOrders(user.id),
    getAnalytics(user.id),
  ]);
  return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}

// ✅ Even better: Streaming with Suspense for independent sections
export default async function DashboardPage() {
  const user = await getUser();
  return (
    <div>
      <UserHeader user={user} />
      <Suspense fallback={<OrdersSkeleton />}

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Steps

  1. 1Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.636 reviews
  • C
    Chaitanya PatilDec 24, 2024

    nextjs-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • M
    Meera ParkDec 20, 2024

    nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • S
    Sophia TaylorDec 16, 2024

    I recommend nextjs-code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • M
    Meera LiDec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: nextjs-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • M
    Mia JacksonNov 27, 2024

    nextjs-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • P
    Piyush GNov 15, 2024

    nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • S
    Sofia ShahNov 11, 2024

    nextjs-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • W
    William RaoNov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in nextjs-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • N
    Noor WhiteOct 18, 2024

    nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • S
    Shikha MishraOct 6, 2024

    nextjs-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 36

1 / 4

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.