Evaluates Next.js App Router code against best practices for Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, and production-readiness criteria. Produces actionable findings categorized by severity with concrete code examples. Delegates to typescript-software-architect-review agent for architectural analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionnextjs-code-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches nextjs-code-review from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate nextjs-code-review. Access via /nextjs-code-review in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
8
total installs
8
this week
194
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
8
installs
8
this week
194
stars
Evaluates Next.js App Router code against best practices for Server Components, Client Components, Server Actions, caching strategies, and production-readiness criteria. Produces actionable findings categorized by severity with concrete code examples. Delegates to typescript-software-architect-review agent for architectural analysis.
Identify Scope: Determine which Next.js route segments and components are under review. Use glob to discover page.tsx, layout.tsx, loading.tsx, error.tsx, route.ts, and middleware.ts files.
Analyze Component Boundaries: Verify proper Server Component / Client Component separation. Check that 'use client' is placed only where necessary and as deep in the component tree as possible. Ensure Server Components don't import client-only modules.
Review Data Fetching: Validate fetch patterns — check for proper cache and revalidate options, parallel data fetching with Promise.all, and avoidance of request waterfalls. Verify that server-side data fetching doesn't expose sensitive data to the client.
Evaluate Caching Strategy: Review static vs dynamic rendering decisions. Check generateStaticParams usage for static generation, revalidatePath/revalidateTag for on-demand revalidation, and proper cache headers for API routes.
Assess Server Actions: Review form actions for proper validation (both client and server-side), error handling, optimistic updates with useOptimistic, and security (ensure actions don't expose sensitive operations without authorization).
Check Middleware: Review middleware for proper request matching, authentication/authorization logic, response modification, and performance impact. Verify it runs only on necessary routes.
Review Metadata & SEO: Check generateMetadata functions, Open Graph tags, structured data, robots.txt, and sitemap.xml configurations. Verify dynamic metadata is properly implemented for pages with variable content.
Validate Findings: Before finalizing, verify each issue by checking the actual code context. Confirm the pattern violation exists, ensure the suggested fix is applicable to the codebase, and remove any false positives.
Produce Review Report: Generate a structured report with severity-classified findings (Critical, Warning, Suggestion), positive observations, and prioritized recommendations with code examples.
// ❌ Bad: Entire page marked as client when only a button needs interactivity
'use client';
export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {
const product = await fetch(`/api/products/${params.id}`);
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>{product.description}</p>
<button onClick={() => addToCart(product.id)}>Add to Cart</button>
</div>
);
}
// ✅ Good: Server Component with isolated Client Component
// app/products/[id]/page.tsx (Server Component)
import { AddToCartButton } from './add-to-cart-button';
export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: Promise<{ id: string }> }) {
const { id } = await params;
const product = await getProduct(id);
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>{product.description}</p>
<AddToCartButton productId={product.id} />
</div>
);
}
// app/products/[id]/add-to-cart-button.tsx (Client Component)
'use client';
export function AddToCartButton({ productId }: { productId: string }) {
return <button onClick={() => addToCart(productId)}>Add to Cart</button>;
}
// ❌ Bad: Sequential data fetching creates waterfall
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
const orders = await getOrders(user.id);
const analytics = await getAnalytics(user.id);
return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}
// ✅ Good: Parallel data fetching with proper Suspense boundaries
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
const [orders, analytics] = await Promise.all([
getOrders(user.id),
getAnalytics(user.id),
]);
return <Dashboard user={user} orders={orders} analytics={analytics} />;
}
// ✅ Even better: Streaming with Suspense for independent sections
export default async function DashboardPage() {
const user = await getUser();
return (
<div>
<UserHeader user={user} />
<Suspense fallback={<OrdersSkeleton />}Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
asyrafhussin/agent-skills
shadcn/improve
anthropics/claude-code
mblode/agent-skills
github/awesome-copilot
leonxlnx/taste-skill
nextjs-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend nextjs-code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: nextjs-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
nextjs-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
nextjs-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in nextjs-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
nextjs-code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
nextjs-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 36