review
Code-review pass focused on the actual diff, aimed at risks that often survive CI such as SQL safety, trust boundaries, and structural regressions.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
—
stars
Installation Guide
How to use review on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
review
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches review from garrytan/gstack and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate review. Access via /review in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Code-review pass focused on the actual diff, aimed at risks that often survive CI such as SQL safety, trust boundaries, and structural regressions. Imported from review/SKILL.md in garrytan/gstack.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
devex-review
0garrytan/gstack
investigate
0garrytan/gstack
open-gstack-browser
4garrytan/gstack
plan-eng-review
3garrytan/gstack
office-hours
3garrytan/gstack
gstack-upgrade
1garrytan/gstack
Reviews
- OOmar Malhotra★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- AAanya Rao★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- SSofia Gonzalez★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- BBenjamin Li★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- HHarper Reddy★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
We added review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- OOmar Chawla★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AAanya Thomas★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
I recommend review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- SSofia Khan★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
We added review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 68
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.