Live-site visual QA plus fixes. It looks for spacing, hierarchy, AI slop, consistency, and interaction issues and can iterate with before/after verification.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add garrytan/gstack --skill gstackCompatible with
Supported agents
Live-site visual QA plus fixes. It looks for spacing, hierarchy, AI slop, consistency, and interaction issues and can iterate with before/after verification. Imported from design-review/SKILL.md in garrytan/gstack.
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondesign-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add garrytan/gstack --skill gstackFetches design-review from garrytan/gstack and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/design-review
Restart Cursor to activate design-review. Access via /design-reviewin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
antigravity-design-expert
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · Frontend · tag: design
high-end-visual-design
leonxlnx/taste-skill · Frontend · tag: design
interior-design-expert
erichowens/some_claude_skills · Frontend · tag: design
emil-design-eng
emilkowalski/skill · Frontend · tag: design
frontend-design
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · Frontend · tag: design
ui-design-brain
carmahhawwari/ui-design-brain · Frontend · tag: design
Registry listing for design-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
design-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
design-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: design-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
design-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend design-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
design-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added design-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: design-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Keeps context tight: design-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 54