Live-site visual QA plus fixes. It looks for spacing, hierarchy, AI slop, consistency, and interaction issues and can iterate with before/after verification.
Works with
Live-site visual QA plus fixes. It looks for spacing, hierarchy, AI slop, consistency, and interaction issues and can iterate with before/after verification. Imported from design-review/SKILL.md in garrytan/gstack.
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondesign-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches design-review from garrytan/gstack and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate design-review. Access via /design-review in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
—
stars
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
anthropics/claude-code
leonxlnx/taste-skill
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
erichowens/some_claude_skills
hyperb1iss/hyperskills
diffusionstudio/lottie
Registry listing for design-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
design-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
design-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: design-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
design-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend design-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
design-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added design-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: design-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Keeps context tight: design-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 54