Official GitHub Spec-Kit integration providing a 7-phase constitution-driven workflow for feature development.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionspec-kit-skillExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches spec-kit-skill from feiskyer/claude-code-settings and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate spec-kit-skill. Access via /spec-kit-skill in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
2
total installs
2
this week
1.4K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
2
installs
2
this week
1.4K
stars
Official GitHub Spec-Kit integration providing a 7-phase constitution-driven workflow for feature development.
This skill works with the GitHub Spec-Kit CLI to guide you through structured feature development:
Storage: Creates files in .specify/specs/NNN-feature-name/ directory with numbered features
First, verify if spec-kit CLI is installed:
command -v specify || echo "Not installed"
If not installed:
# Persistent installation (recommended)
uv tool install specify-cli --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git
# One-time usage
uvx --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git specify init <PROJECT_NAME>
Requirements:
If CLI is installed but project not initialized:
# Initialize in current directory
specify init . --ai claude
# Initialize new project
specify init <project-name> --ai claude
# Options:
# --force: Overwrite non-empty directories
# --script ps: Generate PowerShell scripts (Windows)
# --no-git: Skip Git initialization
Before proceeding, always detect the current state:
if command -v specify &> /dev/null || [ -x "$HOME/.local/bin/specify" ]; then
echo "CLI installed"
else
echo "CLI not installed - guide user through installation"
fi
if [ -d ".specify" ] && [ -f ".specify/memory/constitution.md" ]; then
echo "Project initialized"
else
echo "Project not initialized - guide user through 'specify init'"
fi
# Get latest feature directory
LATEST=$(ls -d .specify/specs/[0-9]* 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)
echo "Latest feature: $LATEST"
Detect phase by checking file existence in latest feature:
FEATURE_DIR=".specify/specs/001-feature-name"
if [ ! -f ".specify/memory/constitution.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: constitution"
elif [ ! -d "$FEATURE_DIR" ]; then
echo "Phase: specify"
elif [ -f "$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md" ] && ! grep -q "## Clarifications" "$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md"; then
echo "Phase: clarify"
elif [ ! -f "$FEATURE_DIR/plan.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: plan"
elif [ ! -f "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: tasks"
elif [ -f "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md" ] && grep -q "\\- \\[ \\]" "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md"; then
echo "Phase: implement"
else
echo "Phase: complete"
fi
Establish foundational principles that govern all development decisions.
Create .specify/memory/constitution.md with:
Gather Context
Draft Constitution
Structure
# Project Constitution
## Core Values
1. **[Value Name]**: [Description and implications]
2. **[Value Name]**: [Description and implications]
## Technical Principles
### Architecture
- [Principle with rationale]
### Code Quality
- [Standards and expectations]
### Performance
- [Performance criteria]
## Decision Framework
When making technical decisions, consider:
1. [Criterion with priority]
2. [Criterion with priority]
# Project Constitution
## Core Values
1. **Simplicity Over Cleverness**: Favor straightforward solutions that are easy to understand and maintain over clever optimizations.
2. **User Experience First**: Every technical decision should improve or maintain user experience.
## Technical Principles
### Architecture
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Keep components loosely coupled
- Design for testability
### Code Quality
- Code reviews required for all changes
- Unit test coverage > 80%
- Documentation for public APIs
### Performance
- Page load < 3 seconds
- API response < 200ms
- Progressive enhancement for slower connections
## Decision Framework
When choosing between approaches:
1. Does it align with our core values?
2. Is it maintainable by the team?
3. Does it scale with our growth?
4. What's the long-term cost?
Define what needs building and why, avoiding technology specifics.
# Create new feature
.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "feature-name"
# Expected JSON output:
# {"BRANCH_NAME": "001-feature-name", "SPEC_FILE": "/path/to/.specify/specs/001-feature-name/spec.md"}
Parse JSON: Extract BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE for subsequent operations.
Load .specify/templates/spec-template.md to understand required sections, then create specification at SPEC_FILE location.
Focus on functional requirements:
# Feature Specification: [Feature Name]
## Problem Statement
[What problem are we solving?]
## User Stories
### Story 1: [Title]
As a [role]
I want [capability]
So that [benefit]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
### Story 2: [Title]
[Continue...]
## Non-Functional Requirements
- Performance: [Specific metrics]
- Security: [Requirements]
- Accessibility: [Standards]
- Scalability: [Expectations]
## Success Metrics
- [Measurable outcome]
- [Measurable outcome]
## Out of Scope
[Explicitly state what's NOT included]
The script automatically:
001-feature-name)Resolve underspecified areas through targeted questioning.
Before pla
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
spec-kit-skill fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Keeps context tight: spec-kit-skill is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
spec-kit-skill has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: spec-kit-skill is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
spec-kit-skill is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
spec-kit-skill has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
spec-kit-skill reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: spec-kit-skill is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for spec-kit-skill matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
We added spec-kit-skill from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 61