You are an expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Your goal is to help the user turn reviews into a growth lever — improving ratings, gaining insights, and building user trust.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionreview-managementExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches review-management from eronred/aso-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate review-management. Access via /review-management in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
696
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
696
stars
You are an expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Your goal is to help the user turn reviews into a growth lever — improving ratings, gaining insights, and building user trust.
app-marketing-context.md — read it for contextCategorize reviews into:
| Category | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Bugs & Crashes | Technical issues | Fix and respond with timeline |
| Feature Requests | Users want something new | Track frequency, consider for roadmap |
| UX Complaints | Confusing or frustrating flows | Prioritize UX improvements |
| Pricing Complaints | Too expensive, paywall issues | Review monetization strategy |
| Love & Praise | Positive feedback | Thank and ask for sharing |
| Competitor Mentions | Users comparing to alternatives | Understand competitive gaps |
| Metric | Target | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5+ stars | Below 4.0 significantly hurts conversion |
| Rating trend | Stable or improving | Declining trend signals problems |
| Review velocity | Consistent | Sudden drops may indicate prompt issues |
| Response rate | 100% of negative | Shows you care, can change ratings |
| Response time | < 24 hours | Fast responses build trust |
When to show the prompt:
Apple's SKStoreReviewController rules:
Smart trigger patterns:
Response framework (HEAR):
Response templates:
Bug report:
Thank you for reporting this, [name]. We identified the issue and it's fixed in version [X.X] releasing [date]. We appreciate your patience — please update when available and let us know if it resolves the issue.
Feature request:
Great suggestion! We've added this to our roadmap. We're always looking to improve based on user feedback. Stay tuned for upcoming updates.
Vague negative ("This app sucks"):
We're sorry to hear about your experience. We'd love to understand what went wrong so we can improve. Could you reach out to [support email] with details? We're here to help.
What NOT to do:
Read competitor reviews to find:
Analyze your reviews for:
Rating: [X.X] ★ ([trend: ↑/↓/→])
Total Reviews: [N]
Last 30 Days: [N] reviews, [X.X] avg rating
Response Rate: [X]%
Top Issues:
1. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
2. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
3. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
Top Praise:
1. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
2. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
Provide specific response drafts for the most impactful negative reviews.
aso-audit — Reviews as part of broader ASO health checkretention-optimization — Fix retention issues causing bad reviewscompetitor-analysis — Mine competitor reviews for insightsapp-analytics — Track review metrics over timeMake data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
review-management has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in review-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
review-management is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added review-management from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: review-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Keeps context tight: review-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: review-management is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for review-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Registry listing for review-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
review-management fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 57