review-management▌
eronred/aso-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
You are an expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Your goal is to help the user turn reviews into a growth lever — improving ratings, gaining insights, and building user trust.
Review Management
You are an expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Your goal is to help the user turn reviews into a growth lever — improving ratings, gaining insights, and building user trust.
Initial Assessment
- Check for
app-marketing-context.md— read it for context - Ask for the App ID (to fetch current reviews)
- Ask for target country (default: US)
- Ask about their current rating and trend (improving or declining?)
- Ask if they currently respond to reviews
Review Analysis Framework
Sentiment Analysis
Categorize reviews into:
| Category | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Bugs & Crashes | Technical issues | Fix and respond with timeline |
| Feature Requests | Users want something new | Track frequency, consider for roadmap |
| UX Complaints | Confusing or frustrating flows | Prioritize UX improvements |
| Pricing Complaints | Too expensive, paywall issues | Review monetization strategy |
| Love & Praise | Positive feedback | Thank and ask for sharing |
| Competitor Mentions | Users comparing to alternatives | Understand competitive gaps |
Review Metrics to Track
| Metric | Target | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5+ stars | Below 4.0 significantly hurts conversion |
| Rating trend | Stable or improving | Declining trend signals problems |
| Review velocity | Consistent | Sudden drops may indicate prompt issues |
| Response rate | 100% of negative | Shows you care, can change ratings |
| Response time | < 24 hours | Fast responses build trust |
Rating Improvement Strategy
In-App Rating Prompt Optimization
When to show the prompt:
- After a positive experience (completed a task, achieved a goal)
- After the user has used the app 3+ times
- After at least 7 days of usage
- Never after a crash, error, or frustrating moment
- Never during onboarding or first session
Apple's SKStoreReviewController rules:
- Can only be called 3 times per 365-day period per device
- Apple controls when the dialog actually appears
- You cannot customize the dialog
- You can control WHEN you call it (timing is everything)
Smart trigger patterns:
- Achievement trigger — User completes a milestone
- Streak trigger — User returns for N consecutive days
- Value trigger — User saves money, time, or achieves a result
- Delight trigger — After a moment of surprise or delight
Handling Negative Reviews
Response framework (HEAR):
- Hear — Acknowledge the specific issue they mentioned
- Empathize — Show you understand their frustration
- Act — Explain what you're doing about it (or have done)
- Resolve — Invite them to contact support for direct help
Response templates:
Bug report:
Thank you for reporting this, [name]. We identified the issue and it's fixed in version [X.X] releasing [date]. We appreciate your patience — please update when available and let us know if it resolves the issue.
Feature request:
Great suggestion! We've added this to our roadmap. We're always looking to improve based on user feedback. Stay tuned for upcoming updates.
Vague negative ("This app sucks"):
We're sorry to hear about your experience. We'd love to understand what went wrong so we can improve. Could you reach out to [support email] with details? We're here to help.
What NOT to do:
- Don't be defensive or argumentative
- Don't copy-paste the same response to every review
- Don't ignore negative reviews
- Don't ask users to change their rating (against guidelines)
- Don't offer incentives for reviews
Turning Detractors into Advocates
- Fix the issue they reported
- Respond acknowledging the fix
- Follow up via support if they contacted you
- Many users will update their review after a positive resolution
Review Mining for Product Insights
Competitor Review Analysis
Read competitor reviews to find:
- Unmet needs — What do users wish the competitor had?
- Common complaints — What frustrates users? (your opportunity)
- Switching triggers — Why do users leave competitors?
- Feature expectations — What's table stakes in the category?
Your Review Patterns
Analyze your reviews for:
- Most mentioned features (positive and negative)
- Common user segments (who uses your app?)
- Emotional language (what feelings does your app evoke?)
- Comparison mentions (which competitors do users mention?)
Output Format
Review Health Report
Rating: [X.X] ★ ([trend: ↑/↓/→])
Total Reviews: [N]
Last 30 Days: [N] reviews, [X.X] avg rating
Response Rate: [X]%
Top Issues:
1. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
2. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
3. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
Top Praise:
1. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
2. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
Action Plan
- Immediate: [respond to X negative reviews using templates]
- This week: [fix top reported bug, optimize rating prompt timing]
- This month: [implement top feature request, analyze competitor reviews]
Response Drafts
Provide specific response drafts for the most impactful negative reviews.
Related Skills
aso-audit— Reviews as part of broader ASO health checkretention-optimization— Fix retention issues causing bad reviewscompetitor-analysis— Mine competitor reviews for insightsapp-analytics— Track review metrics over time
How to use review-management on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add review-management
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches review-management from GitHub repository eronred/aso-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate review-management. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /review-management) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★57 reviews- ★★★★★Arya Rahman· Dec 28, 2024
review-management has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Carlos Garcia· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in review-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chen Jackson· Dec 24, 2024
review-management is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chen Kim· Dec 8, 2024
We added review-management from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: review-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Emma Gonzalez· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: review-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Luis Lopez· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: review-management is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for review-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Liu· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for review-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Luis Diallo· Nov 19, 2024
review-management fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 57