Publication-quality scientific diagrams generated with AI and smart iterative refinement.
Works with
Supports neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, circuit diagrams, and complex scientific visualizations through natural language descriptions
Uses Nano Banana Pro for generation and Gemini 3 Pro for quality review, with smart iteration that stops early if quality meets the threshold for your document type (journal: 8.5/10, poster: 7.0/10, presentation: 6.5/1
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionscientific-schematicsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches scientific-schematics from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate scientific-schematics. Access via /scientific-schematics in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
24.2K
stars
Scientific schematics and diagrams transform complex concepts into clear visual representations for publication. This skill uses Nano Banana Pro AI for diagram generation with Gemini 3 Pro quality review.
How it works:
Quality Thresholds by Document Type:
| Document Type | Threshold | Description |
|---|---|---|
| journal | 8.5/10 | Nature, Science, peer-reviewed journals |
| conference | 8.0/10 | Conference papers |
| thesis | 8.0/10 | Dissertations, theses |
| grant | 8.0/10 | Grant proposals |
| preprint | 7.5/10 | arXiv, bioRxiv, etc. |
| report | 7.5/10 | Technical reports |
| poster | 7.0/10 | Academic posters |
| presentation | 6.5/10 | Slides, talks |
| default | 7.5/10 | General purpose |
Simply describe what you want, and Nano Banana Pro creates it. All diagrams are stored in the figures/ subfolder and referenced in papers/posters.
Create any scientific diagram by simply describing it. Nano Banana Pro handles everything automatically with smart iteration:
# Generate for journal paper (highest quality threshold: 8.5/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "CONSORT participant flow diagram with 500 screened, 150 excluded, 350 randomized" -o figures/consort.png --doc-type journal
# Generate for presentation (lower threshold: 6.5/10 - faster)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Transformer encoder-decoder architecture showing multi-head attention" -o figures/transformer.png --doc-type presentation
# Generate for poster (moderate threshold: 7.0/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "MAPK signaling pathway from EGFR to gene transcription" -o figures/mapk_pathway.png --doc-type poster
# Custom max iterations (max 2)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Complex circuit diagram with op-amp, resistors, and capacitors" -o figures/circuit.png --iterations 2 --doc-type journal
What happens behind the scenes:
Smart Iteration Benefits:
Output: Versioned images plus a detailed review log with quality scores, critiques, and early-stop information.
Set your OpenRouter API key:
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY='your_api_key_here'
Get an API key at: https://openrouter.ai/keys
Effective Prompts for Scientific Diagrams:
✓ Good prompts (specific, detailed):
✗ Avoid vague prompts:
Key elements to include:
Scientific Quality Guidelines (automatically applied):
This skill should be used when:
Simply describe your diagram in natural language. Nano Banana Pro generates it automatically:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o output.png
That's it! The AI handles:
Works for all diagram types:
No coding, no templates, no manual drawing required.
The AI generation system uses smart iteration - it only regenerates if quality is below the threshold for your document type:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Generate image with Nano Banana Pro │
│ ↓ │
│ 2. Review quality with Gemini 3 Pro │
│ ↓ │
│ 3. Score >= threshold? │
│ YES → DONE! (early stop) │
│ NO → Improve prompt, go to step 1 │
│ ↓ │
│ 4. Repeat until quality met OR max iterations │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Prompt Construction:
Scientific diagram guidelines + User request
Output: diagram_v1.png
Gemini 3 Pro evaluates the diagram on:
Example Review Output:
SCORE: 8.0
STRENGTHS:
- Clear flow from top to bottom
- All phases properly labeled
- Professional typography
ISSUES:
- Participant counts slightly small
- Minor overlap on exclusion box
VERDICT: ACCEPTABLE (for poster, threshold 7.0)
| If Score... | Action |
|---|---|
| >= threshold | STOP - Quality is good enough for this document type |
| < threshold | Continue to next iteration with improved prompt |
Example:
If quality is below threshold, the system:
All iterations are saved with a JSON review log that includes early-stop information:
{
"user_prompt": "CONSORT participant flow diagram...",
"doc_type": "poster",
"quality_threshold": 7.0,
"iterations": [
{
"iteration": 1,
"image_path": "figures/consort_v1.png",
"score": 7.5,
"needs_improvement": false,
"critique": "SCORE: 7.5\nSTRENGTHS:..."
}
],
"final_score": 7.5,
"early_stop": true,
"early_stop_reason": "Quality score 7.5 meets threshold 7.0 for poster"
}
Note: With smart iteration, you may see only 1 iteration instead of the full 2 if quality is achieved early!
from scripts.generate_schematic_ai import ScientificSchematicGenerator
# Initialize generator
generator = ScientificSchematicGenerator(
api_key="your_openrouter_key",
verbose=True
)
# Generate with iterative refinement (max 2 iterations)
results = generator.generate_iterative(
user_prompt="Transformer architecture diagram",
output_path="figures/transformer.png",
iterations=2
)
# Access results
print(f"Final score: {results['final_score']}/10")
print(f"Final image: {results['final_image']}")
# Review individual iterations
for iteration in results['iterations']:
print(f"Iteration {iteration['iteration']}: {iteration['score']}/10")
print(f"Critique: {iteration['critique']}")
# Basic usage (default threshold 7.5/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o output.png
# Specify document type for appropriate quality threshold
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type journal # 8.5/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type conference # 8.0/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type poster # 7.0/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type presentation # 6.5/10
# Custom max iterations (1-2)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "complex diagram" -o diagram.png --iterations 2
# Verbose output (see all API calls and reviews)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "flowchart" -o flow.png -v
# Provide API key via flag
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --api-key "sk-or-v1-..."
# Combine options
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "neural network" -o nn.png --doc-type journal --iterations 2 -v
1. Be Specific About Layout:
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
ml-paper-writing
76davila7/claude-code-templates
AI/MLsame repogrill-me
704mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
164cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
141ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.8★★★★★61 reviews- CCharlotte Mensah★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
I recommend scientific-schematics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AArjun Khanna★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: scientific-schematics is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- HHassan Patel★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
scientific-schematics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
scientific-schematics has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- JJin Farah★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
scientific-schematics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- JJin Khan★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in scientific-schematics — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AArjun Menon★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
I recommend scientific-schematics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- MMaya Ghosh★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
scientific-schematics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- HHassan Rao★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
scientific-schematics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- AAlexander Garcia★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in scientific-schematics — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 61
1 / 7Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.