If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionstakeholder-updateExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches stakeholder-update from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate stakeholder-update. Access via /stakeholder-update in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to the audience and cadence.
/stakeholder-update $ARGUMENTS
Ask the user what kind of update:
Ask who the update is for:
If ~~project tracker is connected:
If ~~chat is connected:
If ~~meeting transcription is connected:
If ~~knowledge base is connected:
If no tools are connected, ask the user to provide:
Structure the update for the target audience using the templates and frameworks below.
For executives: TL;DR, status color (G/Y/R), key progress tied to goals, decisions made, risks with mitigation, specific asks, and next milestones. Keep it under 300 words.
For engineering: What shipped (with links), what is in progress (with owners), blockers, decisions needed (with options and recommendation), and what is coming next.
For cross-functional partners: What is coming that affects them, what you need from them (with deadlines), decisions that impact their team, and areas open for input.
For customers: What is new (framed as benefits), what is coming soon, known issues with workarounds, and how to provide feedback. No internal jargon.
For launch announcements: What launched, why it matters, key details (scope, availability, limitations), success metrics, rollout plan, and feedback channels.
After generating the update:
Executives want: strategic context, progress against goals, risks that need their help, decisions that need their input.
Format:
Status: [Green / Yellow / Red]
TL;DR: [One sentence — the most important thing to know]
Progress:
- [Outcome achieved, tied to goal/OKR]
- [Milestone reached, with impact]
- [Key metric movement]
Risks:
- [Risk]: [Mitigation plan]. [Ask if needed].
Decisions needed:
- [Decision]: [Options with recommendation]. Need by [date].
Next milestones:
- [Milestone] — [Date]
Tips for executive updates:
Engineers want: clear priorities, technical context, blockers resolved, decisions that affect their work.
Format:
Shipped:
- [Feature/fix] — [Link to PR/ticket]. [Impact if notable].
In progress:
- [Item] — [Owner]. [Expected completion]. [Blockers if any].
Decisions:
- [Decision made]: [Rationale]. [Link to ADR if exists].
- [Decision needed]: [Context]. [Options]. [Recommendation].
Priority changes:
- [What changed and why]
Coming up:
- [Next items] — [Context on why these are next]
Tips for engineering updates:
Partners (design, marketing, sales, support) want: what is coming that affects them, what they need to prepare for, how to give input.
Format:
What's coming:
- [Feature/launch] — [Date]. [What this means for your team].
What we need from you:
- [Specific ask] — [Context]. By [date].
Decisions made:
- [Decision] — [How it affects your team].
Open for input:
- [Topic we'd love feedback on] — [How to provide it].
Customers want: what is new, what is coming, how it benefits them, how to get started.
Format:
What's new:
- [Feature] — [Benefit in customer terms]. [How to use it / link].
Coming soon:
- [Feature] — [Expected timing]. [Why it matters to you].
Known issues:
- [Issue] — [Status]. [Workaround if available].
Feedback:
- [How to share feedback or request features]
Tips for customer updates:
Green (On Track):
Yellow (At Risk):
Red (Off Track):
Document important decisions for future reference:
# [Decision Title]
## Status
[Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded by ADR-XXX]
## Context
What is the situation that requires a decision? What forces are at play?
## Decision
What did we decide? State the decision clearly and directly.
## Consequences
What are the implications of this decision?
- Positive consequences
- Negative consequences or tradeoffs accepted
- What this enables or prevents in the future
## Alternatives Considered
What other options were evaluated?
For each: what was it, why was it rejected?
Purpose: Surface blockers, coordinate work, maintain momentum. Format: Each person shares:
Facilitation tips:
Purpose: Commit to work for the next sprint. Align on priorities and scope. Format:
Facilitation tips:
Purpose: Reflect on what went well, what did not, and what to change. Format:
Facilitation tips:
Purpose: Show progress, gather feedback, build alignment. Format:
Facilitation tips:
Keep updates scannable. Use bold for key points, bullets for lists. Executive updates should be under 300 words. Engineering updates can be longer but should still be structured for skimming.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Keeps context tight: stakeholder-update is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
stakeholder-update reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend stakeholder-update for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
stakeholder-update fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
stakeholder-update is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added stakeholder-update from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
stakeholder-update is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
stakeholder-update reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend stakeholder-update for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for stakeholder-update matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 69