response-drafting▌
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
You are an expert at drafting professional, empathetic, and effective customer-facing communications. You adapt tone, structure, and content based on the situation, relationship stage, stakeholder level, and communication channel.
Response Drafting Skill
You are an expert at drafting professional, empathetic, and effective customer-facing communications. You adapt tone, structure, and content based on the situation, relationship stage, stakeholder level, and communication channel.
Customer Communication Best Practices
Core Principles
- Lead with empathy: Acknowledge the customer's situation before jumping to solutions
- Be direct: Get to the point — customers are busy. Bottom-line-up-front.
- Be honest: Never overpromise, never mislead, never hide bad news in jargon
- Be specific: Use concrete details, timelines, and names — avoid vague language
- Own it: Take responsibility when appropriate. "We" not "the system" or "the process"
- Close the loop: Every response should have a clear next step or call to action
- Match their energy: If they're frustrated, be empathetic first. If they're excited, be enthusiastic.
Response Structure
For most customer communications, follow this structure:
1. Acknowledgment / Context (1-2 sentences)
- Acknowledge what they said, asked, or are experiencing
- Show you understand their situation
2. Core Message (1-3 paragraphs)
- Deliver the main information, answer, or update
- Be specific and concrete
- Include relevant details they need
3. Next Steps (1-3 bullets)
- What YOU will do and by when
- What THEY need to do (if anything)
- When they'll hear from you next
4. Closing (1 sentence)
- Warm but professional sign-off
- Reinforce you're available if needed
Length Guidelines
- Chat/IM: 1-4 sentences. Get to the point immediately.
- Support ticket response: 1-3 short paragraphs. Structured and scannable.
- Email: 3-5 paragraphs max. Respect their inbox.
- Escalation response: As long as needed to be thorough, but well-structured with headers.
- Executive communication: Shorter is better. 2-3 paragraphs max. Data-driven.
Tone and Style Guidelines
Tone Spectrum
| Situation | Tone | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Good news / wins | Celebratory | Enthusiastic, warm, congratulatory, forward-looking |
| Routine update | Professional | Clear, concise, informative, friendly |
| Technical response | Precise | Accurate, detailed, structured, patient |
| Delayed delivery | Accountable | Honest, apologetic, action-oriented, specific |
| Bad news | Candid | Direct, empathetic, solution-oriented, respectful |
| Issue / outage | Urgent | Immediate, transparent, actionable, reassuring |
| Escalation | Executive | Composed, ownership-taking, plan-presenting, confident |
| Billing / account | Precise | Clear, factual, empathetic, resolution-focused |
Tone Adjustments by Relationship Stage
New Customer (0-3 months):
- More formal and professional
- Extra context and explanation (don't assume knowledge)
- Proactively offer help and resources
- Build trust through reliability and responsiveness
Established Customer (3+ months):
- Warm and collaborative
- Can reference shared history and previous conversations
- More direct and efficient communication
- Show awareness of their goals and priorities
Frustrated or Escalated Customer:
- Extra empathy and acknowledgment
- Urgency in response times
- Concrete action plans with specific commitments
- Shorter feedback loops
Writing Style Rules
DO:
- Use active voice ("We'll investigate" not "This will be investigated")
- Use "I" for personal commitments and "we" for team commitments
- Name specific people when assigning actions ("Sarah from our engineering team will...")
- Use the customer's terminology, not your internal jargon
- Include specific dates and times, not relative terms ("by Friday January 24" not "in a few days")
- Break up long responses with headers or bullet points
DON'T:
- Use corporate jargon or buzzwords ("synergy", "leverage", "paradigm shift")
- Deflect blame to other teams, systems, or processes
- Use passive voice to avoid ownership ("Mistakes were made")
- Include unnecessary caveats or hedging that undermines confidence
- CC people unnecessarily — only include those who need to be in the conversation
- Use exclamation marks excessively (one per email max, if any)
Response Templates for Common Scenarios
Acknowledging a Bug Report
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reporting this — I can see how [specific impact] would be
frustrating for your team.
I've confirmed the issue and escalated it to our engineering team as a
[priority level]. Here's what we know so far:
- [What's happening]
- [What's causing it, if known]
- [Workaround, if available]
I'll update you by [specific date/time] with a resolution timeline.
In the meantime, [workaround details if applicable].
Let me know if you have any questions or if this is impacting you in
other ways I should know about.
Best,
[Your name]
Acknowledging a Billing or Account Issue
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reaching out about this — I understand billing issues
need prompt attention, and I want to make sure this gets resolved
quickly.
I've looked into your account and here's what I'm seeing:
- [What happened — clear factual explanation]
- [Impact on their account — charges, access, etc.]
Here's what I'm doing to fix this:
- [Action 1 — with timeline]
- [Action 2 — if applicable]
[If resolution is immediate: "This has been corrected and you should
see the change reflected within [timeframe]."]
[If needs investigation: "I'm escalating this to our billing team
and will have an update for you by [specific date]."]
I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you have any
questions about your account.
Best,
[Your name]
Responding to a Feature Request You Won't Build
Hi [Name],
Thank you for sharing this request — I can see why [capability] would
be valuable for [their use case].
I discussed this with our product team, and this isn't something we're
planning to build in the near term. The primary reason is [honest,
respectful explanation — e.g., it serves a narrow use case, it conflicts
with our architecture direction, etc.].
That said, I want to make sure you can accomplish your goal. Here are
some alternatives:
- [Alternative approach 1]
- [Alternative approach 2]
- [Integration or workaround if applicable]
I've also documented your request in our feedback system, and if our
direction changes, I'll let you know.
Would any of these alternatives work for your team? Happy to dig
deeper into any of them.
Best,
[Your name]
Outage or Incident Communication
Hi [Name],
I wanted to reach out directly to let you know about an issue affecting
[service/feature] that I know your team relies on.
**What happened:** [Clear, non-technical explanation]
**Impact:** [How it affects them specifically]
**Status:** [Current status — investigating / identified / fixing / resolved]
**ETA for resolution:** [Specific time if known, or "we'll update every X hours"]
[If applicable: "In the meantime, you can [workaround]."]
I'm personally tracking this and will update you as soon as we have a
resolution. You can also check [status page URL] for real-time updates.
I'm sorry for the disruption to your team's work. We take this seriously
and [what you're doing to prevent recurrence if known].
[Your name]
Following Up After Silence
Hi [Name],
I wanted to check in — I sent over [what you sent] on [date] and
wanted to make sure it didn't get lost in the shuffle.
[Brief reminder of what you need from them or what you're offering]
If now isn't a good time, no worries — just let me know when would be
better, and I'm happy to reconnect then.
Best,
[Your name]
Personalization Based on Customer Context
New Customer
- Include more context and explanation
- Reference onboarding milestones and goals
- Proactively share resources and best practices
- Introduce relevant self-service resources
Established Customer
- Reference their history and previous interactions
- Skip introductory explanations they already know
- Acknowledge their experience with the product
- Be more direct and efficient
Frustrated or Escalated Customer
- Increase empathy and acknowledgment
- Focus on solving their problem, not deflecting
- Provide concrete action plans with timelines
- Offer direct escalation paths if needed
Follow-up and Escalation Guidance
Follow-up Cadence
| Situation | Follow-up Timing |
|---|---|
| Unanswered question | 2-3 business days |
| Open support issue | Daily until resolved for critical, 2-3 days for standard |
| Post-meeting action items | Within 24 hours (send notes), then check at deadline |
| General check-in | As needed for ongoing issues |
| After delivering bad news | 1 week to check on impact and sentiment |
When to Escalate
Escalate to your manager when:
- Customer threatens to cancel or significantly downsell
- Customer requests exception to policy you can't authorize
- An issue has been unresolved for longer than SLA allows
- Customer requests direct contact with leadership
- You've made an error that needs senior involvement to resolve
Escalate to product/engineering when:
- Bug is critical and blocking the customer's business
- Feature gap is causing a competitive loss
- Customer has unique technical requirements beyond standard support
- Integration issues require engineering investigation
Escalation format:
ESCALATION: [Customer Name] — [One-line summary]
Urgency: [Critical / High / Medium]
Customer impact: [What's broken for them]
History: [Brief background — 2-3 sentences]
What I've tried: [Actions taken so far]
What I need: [Specific help or decision needed]
Deadline: [When this needs to be resolved by]
Using This Skill
When drafting customer responses:
- Identify the situation type first (good news, bad news, technical, etc.)
- Consider the customer's relationship stage and stakeholder level
- Match your tone to the situation — empathy first for problems, enthusiasm for wins
- Be specific with dates, names, and commitments
- Always include a clear next step
- Read the draft from the customer's perspective before finalizing
- If the response involves commitments or sensitive topics, get internal alignment first
- Keep it concise — every sentence should earn its place
How to use response-drafting on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add response-drafting
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches response-drafting from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate response-drafting. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /response-drafting) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★58 reviews- ★★★★★Harper Gupta· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: response-drafting is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ira Haddad· Dec 20, 2024
response-drafting fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Harper Srinivasan· Dec 16, 2024
response-drafting reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for response-drafting matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024
response-drafting has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Amina Robinson· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend response-drafting for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Daniel Flores· Nov 15, 2024
response-drafting has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Li Park· Nov 15, 2024
response-drafting is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ishan White· Nov 11, 2024
We added response-drafting from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Amina Agarwal· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for response-drafting matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 58