Retrieve a comprehensive contact profile from Common Room. Supports lookup by email, social handle, or name + company. Returns enriched data including activity history, Spark, scores, website visits, and CRM fields.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncontact-researchExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches contact-research from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate contact-research. Access via /contact-research in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
Retrieve a comprehensive contact profile from Common Room. Supports lookup by email, social handle, or name + company. Returns enriched data including activity history, Spark, scores, website visits, and CRM fields.
Common Room supports multiple lookup methods — use whichever the user has provided:
| What the user gives | Lookup method |
|---|---|
| Email address | Look up by email (most reliable) |
| LinkedIn, Twitter/X, or GitHub handle | Look up by social handle — specify handle type explicitly |
| Name + company | Identity resolution by name + org domain; present matches if ambiguous |
| Name only | Search by name; if multiple matches, show a brief list and ask the user to confirm |
If no match is found, respond: "Common Room doesn't have a record for this person." Do not speculate or fabricate profile data.
Use the Common Room object catalog to see available field groups and their contents. For full profiles, request all groups. For targeted questions, request only what's relevant.
Key field groups to know about:
Contact Initiated filter (last 60 days) for their actions, not your team'sIf Spark is available, use it. Spark provides:
If Spark is unavailable but real activity data exists (recent actions, website visits, community engagement), infer a persona from those signals. If neither Spark nor activity data is available, classify as Unknown — do not guess a persona from title alone.
Retrieve all Sparks (not just the most recent) when the user wants to understand how this contact's engagement has evolved over time.
Pull an abbreviated account snapshot for this contact's parent company. Note:
Based on activity and signals, surface the strongest 2–3 hooks:
Contact Initiated activity (community post, product event, support ticket)Only include sections where data was actually returned. Omit sections with no data rather than filling them with guesses.
When data is rich:
## [Contact Name] — Profile
**Overview**
[2 sentences: who they are, their role, and relationship status]
**Details**
- Title: [title]
- Company: [company]
- Email: [email]
- LinkedIn: [URL]
- Other profiles: [Twitter/X, GitHub, CRM link if available]
**Scores** [If scores returned]
[All scores as raw values or percentiles]
**Recent Activity** (last 60 days) [If activity returned]
[3–5 bullets with dates]
**Website Visits** (last 12 weeks) [If visit data exists]
[Total visit count + list of pages visited]
**Spark Profile** [If Spark data is non-null]
[Persona type, background summary, influence signals]
**Segments** [If segments returned]
[List of segment names this contact belongs to]
**Account Context**
[1–2 sentences on their company's status]
**Conversation Starters**
[2–3 specific, signal-backed openers]
When data is sparse (e.g., only name, title, email, tags returned; sparkSummary is null):
## [Contact Name] — Profile (Limited Data)
**Data available:** [List exactly what Common Room returned]
[Present only the returned fields]
**Web Search**
[Any findings from searching their name + company]
**Note:** Common Room has limited data on this contact. No activity history, scores, or Spark profile available. I can run deeper web searches or look up their company for additional context.
Do not generate conversation starters, persona inferences, or engagement assessments from sparse data. These require real signals.
Contact Initiated activity (last 60 days) is the primary engagement signal — lead with itreferences/contact-signals-guide.md — full field descriptions, Spark persona guide, and conversation starter principlesMake data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: contact-research is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added contact-research from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
contact-research has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend contact-research for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
contact-research is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: contact-research is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Keeps context tight: contact-research is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
contact-research is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
contact-research reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for contact-research matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 64