m02-resource

actionbook/rust-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m02-resource
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

skill.md

Resource Management

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

What ownership pattern does this resource need?

Before choosing a smart pointer, understand:

  • Is ownership single or shared?
  • Is access single-threaded or multi-threaded?
  • Are there potential cycles?

Error → Design Question

Error Don't Just Say Ask Instead
"Need heap allocation" "Use Box" Why can't this be on stack?
Rc memory leak "Use Weak" Is the cycle necessary in design?
RefCell panic "Use try_borrow" Is runtime check the right approach?
Arc overhead complaint "Accept it" Is multi-thread access actually needed?

Thinking Prompt

Before choosing a smart pointer:

  1. What's the ownership model?

    • Single owner → Box or owned value
    • Shared ownership → Rc/Arc
    • Weak reference → Weak
  2. What's the thread context?

    • Single-thread → Rc, Cell, RefCell
    • Multi-thread → Arc, Mutex, RwLock
  3. Are there cycles?

    • Yes → One direction must be Weak
    • No → Regular Rc/Arc is fine

Trace Up ↑

When pointer choice is unclear, trace to design:

"Should I use Arc or Rc?"
    ↑ Ask: Is this data shared across threads?
    ↑ Check: m07-concurrency (thread model)
    ↑ Check: domain-* (performance constraints)
Situation Trace To Question
Rc vs Arc confusion m07-concurrency What's the concurrency model?
RefCell panics m03-mutability Is interior mutability right here?
Memory leaks m12-lifecycle Where should cleanup happen?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Need single-owner heap data"
    ↓ Use: Box<T>

"Need shared immutable data (single-thread)"
    ↓ Use: Rc<T>

"Need shared immutable data (multi-thread)"
    ↓ Use: Arc<T>

"Need to break reference cycle"
    ↓ Use: Weak<T>

"Need shared mutable data"
    ↓ Single-thread: Rc<RefCell<T>>
    ↓ Multi-thread: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>

Quick Reference

Type Ownership Thread-Safe Use When
Box<T> Single Yes Heap allocation, recursive types
Rc<T> Shared No Single-thread shared ownership
Arc<T> Shared Yes Multi-thread shared ownership
Weak<T> Weak ref Same as Rc/Arc Break reference cycles
Cell<T> Single No Interior mutability (Copy types)
RefCell<T> Single No Interior mutability (runtime check)

Decision Flowchart

Need heap allocation?
├─ Yes → Single owner?
│        ├─ Yes → Box<T>
│        └─ No → Multi-thread?
│                ├─ Yes → Arc<T>
│                └─ No → Rc<T>
└─ No → Stack allocation (default)

Have reference cycles?
├─ Yes → Use Weak for one direction
└─ No → Regular Rc/Arc

Need interior mutability?
├─ Yes → Thread-safe needed?
│        ├─ Yes → Mutex<T> or RwLock<T>
│        └─ No → T: Copy? → Cell<T> : RefCell<T>
└─ No → Use &mut T

Common Errors

Problem Cause Fix
Rc cycle leak Mutual strong refs Use Weak for one direction
RefCell panic Borrow conflict at runtime Use try_borrow or restructure
Arc overhead Atomic ops in hot path Consider Rc if single-threaded
Box unnecessary Data fits on stack Remove Box

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Why Bad Better
Arc everywhere Unnecessary atomic overhead Use Rc for single-thread
RefCell everywhere Runtime panics Design clear ownership
Box for small types Unnecessary allocation Stack allocation
Ignore Weak for cycles Memory leaks Design parent-child with Weak

Related Skills

When See
Ownership errors m01-ownership
Interior mutability details m03-mutability
Multi-thread context m07-concurrency
Resource lifecycle m12-lifecycle

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.770 reviews
  • Camila Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024

    m02-resource fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Kofi Tandon· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend m02-resource for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Camila Martinez· Dec 20, 2024

    We added m02-resource from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Camila Iyer· Dec 16, 2024

    Keeps context tight: m02-resource is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Carlos Abbas· Dec 16, 2024

    m02-resource reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for m02-resource matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: m02-resource is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Luis Martinez· Nov 19, 2024

    m02-resource fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Amelia Dixit· Nov 19, 2024

    Useful defaults in m02-resource — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Anaya Yang· Nov 11, 2024

    m02-resource reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 70

1 / 7