### Team Live Ops
Works with
description: "Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to
argument-hint: "[season name or event description]"
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionteam-live-opsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches team-live-ops from Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate team-live-ops. Access via /team-live-ops in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
10.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
10.7K
stars
| name | team-live-ops |
| description | "Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update." |
| argument-hint | "[season name or event description]" |
| user-invocable | true |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite |
Argument check: If no season name or event description is provided, output:
"Usage:
/team-live-ops [season name or event description]— Provide the name or description of the season or live event to plan." Then stop immediately without spawning any subagents or reading any files.
When this skill is invoked with a valid argument, orchestrate the live-ops team through a structured planning pipeline.
Decision Points: At each phase transition, use AskUserQuestion to present
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
subagent_type: live-ops-designer — Season/event structure and retention mechanicssubagent_type: economy-designer — Live economy balance and reward pricingsubagent_type: analytics-engineer — Success metrics, A/B tests, event instrumentationsubagent_type: community-manager — Player-facing communication and messagingsubagent_type: narrative-director — Seasonal theme and narrative framingsubagent_type: writer — All player-facing text: event descriptions, item names, copyAlways provide full context in each agent's prompt (game concept path, existing season docs, ethics policy path, current economy state). Launch independent agents in parallel where the pipeline allows it (Phases 3 and 4 can run simultaneously).
Delegate to live-ops-designer:
Delegate to narrative-director:
Delegate to economy-designer:
design/live-ops/economy-rules.mdDelegate to analytics-engineer:
Delegate in parallel:
Delegate to community-manager:
Collect outputs from all phases and present a consolidated season plan:
Present a summary to the user with:
design/live-ops/ethics-policy.md
design/live-ops/ethics-policy.md not found. Economy design was not reviewed against an ethics policy. Recommend creating one before production begins." Include this flag in the season design output document. Add to next steps: create design/live-ops/ethics-policy.md.AskUserQuestion with options: revise economy design / override with documented rationale / cancel. If user chooses to revise: re-spawn economy-designer to produce a corrected design, then return to Phase 7 review.Ask the user to approve the season plan before delegating to production teams. Issue the COMPLETE verdict only after the user approves and no unresolved ethics violations remain. If an ethics violation is unresolved, end with Verdict: BLOCKED.
All documents save to design/live-ops/:
seasons/S[N]_[name].md — Season design document (from Phase 1-3)seasons/S[N]_[name]_analytics.md — Analytics plan (from Phase 4)seasons/S[N]_[name]_comms.md — Communication calendar (from Phase 6)If any spawned agent (via Task) returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete:
If a BLOCKED state is unresolvable, end with Verdict: BLOCKED instead of COMPLETE.
All file writes (season design docs, analytics plans, communication calendars) are delegated to sub-agents spawned via Task. Each sub-agent enforces the "May I write to [path]?" protocol. This orchestrator does not write files directly.
A summary covering: season theme and scope, economy design highlights, success metrics, content list, communication plan, and any open decisions needing user input before production.
Verdict: COMPLETE — season plan produced and handed off for production.
/design-review on the season design document for consistency validation./sprint-plan to schedule content creation work for the season./team-release when the season content is ready to deploy.Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
JuliusBrussee/caveman
JuliusBrussee/caveman
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing
JuliusBrussee/caveman
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing
vercel-labs/skills
We added team-live-ops from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: team-live-ops is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: team-live-ops is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for team-live-ops matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
team-live-ops is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
team-live-ops reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
team-live-ops has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
team-live-ops is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
team-live-ops fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in team-live-ops — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 48