decision▌

Structured Architectural Decision Record generator with AI-optimized formatting and sequential file management. \n \n Generates standardized ADR documents with front matter, context, decision rationale, and consequences organized into positive and negative outcomes \n Requires four inputs (decision title, context, decision, alternatives, stakeholders) with validation to prompt for missing information before generation \n Uses coded bullet-point system (3-4 letter codes + 3-digit numbers) across

Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns for context. Provides frameworks for pattern selection, ADR creation, and technical debt management.

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:

Capture architectural decisions as they happen during coding sessions. Instead of decisions living only in Slack threads, PR comments, or someone's memory, this skill produces structured ADR documents that live alongside the code.

Structured decision-making frameworks and processes drawn from 65 product leaders. \n \n Guides users through decision classification (reversible vs. irreversible), blocker identification, and framework selection to move from deliberation to action \n Covers core principles including making implicit assumptions explicit, using curiosity loops for advice gathering, and distinguishing when data-driven analysis ends and conviction takes over \n Flags common pitfalls: analysis paralysis, decision by

Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.

Document significant technical decisions with structured context, rationale, and consequences. \n \n Provides five template formats (standard MADR, lightweight, Y-statement, deprecation, RFC-style) covering different decision complexity levels and team preferences \n Includes lifecycle management patterns for proposed, accepted, deprecated, and superseded decisions with clear status tracking \n Offers directory structure, indexing strategies, and automation tools (adr-tools) for maintaining ADR

Structured decision-making frameworks for evaluating options and reducing choice paralysis. \n \n Includes five decision frameworks: Pros/Cons Analysis, Decision Matrix, Cost-Benefit Analysis, SWOT Analysis, and ICE Framework (Impact × Confidence × Ease) \n Generates standardized output with option comparison, weighted criteria scoring, risk and effort assessment, and actionable recommendations \n Emphasizes upfront success criteria definition, reversibility assessment, and timeline setting to a