sciomc▌
yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Orchestrate parallel scientist agents for comprehensive research workflows with optional AUTO mode for fully autonomous execution.
Research Skill
Orchestrate parallel scientist agents for comprehensive research workflows with optional AUTO mode for fully autonomous execution.
Overview
Research is a multi-stage workflow that decomposes complex research goals into parallel investigations:
- Decomposition - Break research goal into independent stages/hypotheses
- Execution - Run parallel scientist agents on each stage
- Verification - Cross-validate findings, check consistency
- Synthesis - Aggregate results into comprehensive report
Usage Examples
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc <goal> # Standard research with user checkpoints
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc AUTO: <goal> # Fully autonomous until complete
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc status # Check current research session status
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc resume # Resume interrupted research session
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc list # List all research sessions
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc report <session-id> # Generate report for session
Quick Examples
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc What are the performance characteristics of different sorting algorithms?
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc AUTO: Analyze authentication patterns in this codebase
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc How does the error handling work across the API layer?
Research Protocol
Stage Decomposition Pattern
When given a research goal, decompose into 3-7 independent stages:
## Research Decomposition
**Goal:** <original research goal>
### Stage 1: <stage-name>
- **Focus:** What this stage investigates
- **Hypothesis:** Expected finding (if applicable)
- **Scope:** Files/areas to examine
- **Tier:** LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH
### Stage 2: <stage-name>
...
Parallel Scientist Invocation
Fire independent stages in parallel via Task tool:
// Stage 1 - Simple data gathering
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="haiku", prompt="[RESEARCH_STAGE:1] Investigate...")
// Stage 2 - Standard analysis
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="sonnet", prompt="[RESEARCH_STAGE:2] Analyze...")
// Stage 3 - Complex reasoning
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="opus", prompt="[RESEARCH_STAGE:3] Deep analysis of...")
Smart Model Routing
CRITICAL: Always pass model parameter explicitly!
| Task Complexity | Agent | Model | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data gathering | scientist (model=haiku) |
haiku | File enumeration, pattern counting, simple lookups |
| Standard analysis | scientist |
sonnet | Code analysis, pattern detection, documentation review |
| Complex reasoning | scientist |
opus | Architecture analysis, cross-cutting concerns, hypothesis validation |
Routing Decision Guide
| Research Task | Tier | Example Prompt |
|---|---|---|
| "Count occurrences of X" | LOW | "Count all usages of useState hook" |
| "Find all files matching Y" | LOW | "List all test files in the project" |
| "Analyze pattern Z" | MEDIUM | "Analyze error handling patterns in API routes" |
| "Document how W works" | MEDIUM | "Document the authentication flow" |
| "Explain why X happens" | HIGH | "Explain why race conditions occur in the cache layer" |
| "Compare approaches A vs B" | HIGH | "Compare Redux vs Context for state management here" |
Verification Loop
After parallel execution completes, verify findings:
// Cross-validation stage
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="sonnet", prompt="
[RESEARCH_VERIFICATION]
Cross-validate these findings for consistency:
Stage 1 findings: <summary>
Stage 2 findings: <summary>
Stage 3 findings: <summary>
Check for:
1. Contradictions between stages
2. Missing connections
3. Gaps in coverage
4. Evidence quality
Output: [VERIFIED] or [CONFLICTS:<list>]
")
AUTO Mode
AUTO mode runs the complete research workflow autonomously with loop control.
Loop Control Protocol
[RESEARCH + AUTO - ITERATION {{ITERATION}}/{{MAX}}]
Your previous attempt did not output the completion promise. Continue working.
Current state: {{STATE}}
Completed stages: {{COMPLETED_STAGES}}
Pending stages: {{PENDING_STAGES}}
Promise Tags
| Tag | Meaning | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
[PROMISE:RESEARCH_COMPLETE] |
Research finished successfully | All stages done, verified, report generated |
[PROMISE:RESEARCH_BLOCKED] |
Cannot proceed | Missing data, access issues, circular dependency |
AUTO Mode Rules
- Max Iterations: 10 (configurable)
- Continue until: Promise tag emitted OR max iterations
- State tracking: Persist after each stage completion
- Cancellation:
/oh-my-claudecode:cancelor "stop", "cancel"
AUTO Mode Example
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc AUTO: Comprehensive security analysis of the authentication system
[Decomposition]
- Stage 1 (LOW): Enumerate auth-related files
- Stage 2 (MEDIUM): Analyze token handling
- Stage 3 (MEDIUM): Review session management
- Stage 4 (HIGH): Identify vulnerability patterns
- Stage 5 (MEDIUM): Document security controls
[Execution - Parallel]
Firing stages 1-3 in parallel...
Firing stages 4-5 after dependencies complete...
[Verification]
Cross-validating findings...
[Synthesis]
Generating report...
[PROMISE:RESEARCH_COMPLETE]
Parallel Execution Patterns
Independent Dataset Analysis (Parallel)
When stages analyze different data sources:
// All fire simultaneously
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="haiku", prompt="[STAGE:1] Analyze src/api/...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="haiku", prompt="[STAGE:2] Analyze src/utils/...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="haiku", prompt="[STAGE:3] Analyze src/components/...")
Hypothesis Battery (Parallel)
When testing multiple hypotheses:
// Test hypotheses simultaneously
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="sonnet", prompt="[HYPOTHESIS:A] Test if caching improves...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="sonnet", prompt="[HYPOTHESIS:B] Test if batching reduces...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="sonnet", prompt="[HYPOTHESIS:C] Test if lazy loading helps...")
Cross-Validation (Sequential)
When verification depends on all findings:
// Wait for all parallel stages
[stages complete]
// Then sequential verification
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:scientist", model="opus", prompt="
[CROSS_VALIDATION]
Validate consistency across all findings:
- Finding 1: ...
- Finding 2: ...
- Finding 3: ...
")
Concurrency Limit
Maximum 20 concurrent scientist agents to prevent resource exhaustion.
If more than 20 stages, batch them:
Batch 1: Stages 1-5 (parallel)
[wait for completion]
Batch 2: Stages 6-7 (parallel)
Session Management
Directory Structure
.omc/research/{session-id}/
state.json # Session state and progress
stages/
stage-1.md # Stage 1 findings
stage-2.md # Stage 2 findings
...
findings/
raw/ # Raw findings from scientists
verified/ # Post-verification findings
figures/
figure-1.png # Generated visualizations
...
report.md # Final synthesized report
State File Format
{
"id": "research-20240115-abc123",
"goal": "Original research goal",
"status": "in_progress | complete | blocked | cancelled",
"mode": "standard | auto",
"iteration": 3,
"maxIterations": 10,
"stages": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Stage name",
"tier": "LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH",
"status": "pending | running | complete | failed",
"startedAt": "ISO timestamp",
"completedAt": "ISO timestamp",
"findingsFile": "stages/stage-1.md"
}
],
"verification": {
"status": "pending | passed | failed",
"conflicts": [],
"completedAt": "ISO timestamp"
},
"createdAt": "ISO timestamp",
"updatedAt": "ISO timestamp"
}
Session Commands
| Command | Action |
|---|---|
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc status |
Show current session progress |
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc resume |
Resume most recent interrupted session |
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc resume <session-id> |
Resume specific session |
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc list |
List all sessions with status |
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc report <session-id> |
Generate/regenerate report |
/oh-my-claudecode:sciomc cancel |
Cancel current session (preserves state) |
Tag Extraction
Scientists use structured tags for findings. Extract them with these patterns:
Finding Tags
[FINDING:<id>] <title>
<evidence and analysis>
[/FINDING]
[EVIDENCE:<finding-id>]
- File: <path>
- Lines: <range>
- Content: <relevant code/text>
[/EVIDENCE]
[CONFIDENCE:<level>] # HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
<reasoning for confidence level>
Extraction Regex Patterns
// Finding extraction
const findingPattern = /\[FINDING:(\w+)\]\s*(.*?)\n([\s\S]*?)\[\/FINDING\]/g;
// Evidence extraction
const evidencePattern = /\[EVIDENCE:(\w+)\]([\s\S]*?)\[\/EVIDENCE\]/g;
// Confidence extraction
const confidencePattern = /\[CONFIDENCE:(HIGH|MEDIUMhow to use sciomcHow to use sciomc on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sciomc
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode --skill sciomcThe skills CLI fetches sciomc from GitHub repository yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/sciomcReload or restart Cursor to activate sciomc. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sciomc) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.6★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Ishan Abebe· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in sciomc — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Mensah· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for sciomc matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 12, 2024
Keeps context tight: sciomc is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Nia Ndlovu· Dec 8, 2024
sciomc is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Nia Chen· Nov 27, 2024
sciomc reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Kiara Malhotra· Nov 15, 2024
sciomc has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Kaira Thomas· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: sciomc is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 3, 2024
Registry listing for sciomc matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hana Robinson· Oct 26, 2024
sciomc is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 22, 2024
sciomc reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 45
1 / 5