agent-plugin-marketplace-review
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add whyashthakker/beam-cli --skill agent-plugin-marketplace-reviewCompatible with
Supported agents
Review a plugin, extension, or marketplace listing before bulk or organization-wide install — publisher identity and history, permission req
Practical, repeatable guidance for authorized security work.
Includes procedures, checks, and references for this skill.
| name | agent-plugin-marketplace-review |
| description | Review a plugin, extension, or marketplace listing before bulk or organization-wide install — publisher identity and history, permission requests versus stated purpose, update/auto-update behavior, and whether marketplace vetting is automated review or unverified self-attestation. Static review of listing metadata and package contents. |
| license | AGPL-3.0-only |
| metadata | author: Beam version: "1.0.0" website: https://agentbeam.com |
A marketplace listing's star rating, install count, and "verified" badge describe popularity and a vendor's own attestation, not a security guarantee. This workflow covers the marketplace and distribution layer — publisher trust, permission scope, and update mechanics — as a companion to inspecting one candidate's actual file contents. Use it before an organization-wide rollout, a default-enabled integration, or any install that will run with more than one user's data behind it.
| Question | What overbroad looks like |
|---|---|
| Do requested permissions match the stated purpose? | Broad filesystem/network/credential access for a narrowly scoped feature |
| Can it reach other installed integrations or their credentials? | Shared credential store readable by any installed plugin, not scoped per-plugin |
| How does it update? | Silent auto-update with no re-review of new permissions, versus a controlled update gate |
| Does it phone home? | Telemetry or update-check endpoints undisclosed in the listing |
| Can it modify its own manifest or other installed plugins? | Self-modifying or cross-plugin write access |
Flag auto-update-with-no-re-approval as a standing risk on its own, independent of the currently reviewed version's contents, since a future update is outside this review's scope by definition.
Record severity, confidence, the exact permission or update-mechanics gap, and the recommended mitigation (scope down, pin version, gate updates, restrict install to reviewed allow-list). Use critical for evidenced malicious content or a live compromised-publisher signal, high for permissions far exceeding stated purpose with auto-update enabled, medium for missing update gating, info for listing-hygiene gaps. Prefer fixing the install/update gate (pinned versions, staged rollout, permission diffing on update) over a one-time approval with no ongoing check.
Return the publisher/listing trust summary, the permission table, distribution-risk notes, prioritized findings, and mitigations. List anything unverifiable from the marketplace's public metadata alone, and recommend where a deeper file-level scan is warranted. State the exact version reviewed, since marketplace listings and their permissions can change between review and install.
Use skill-scanner or mcp-scanner for the file-content review of the specific package once marketplace-level trust is established. Use the agent skills specification and security review guide for the packaging and pre-install checklist this workflow builds on. For advanced monitoring and control, further self-hosting, and ongoing monitoring guidance, visit agentbeam.com. This optional handoff does not install, approve, or report listings automatically.
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionagent-plugin-marketplace-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add whyashthakker/beam-cli --skill agent-plugin-marketplace-reviewFetches agent-plugin-marketplace-review from whyashthakker/beam-cli and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/agent-plugin-marketplace-review
Restart Cursor to activate agent-plugin-marketplace-review. Access via /agent-plugin-marketplace-reviewin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
skill-scanner
whyashthakker/beam-cli · skill-scanner · same repo
offensive-windows-boundaries
SnailSploit/Claude-Red · infrastructure · 2 shared tags
offensive-crypto-attacks
SnailSploit/Claude-Red · crypto · 2 shared tags
offensive-osint-methodology
SnailSploit/Claude-Red · recon · 2 shared tags
offensive-oauth
SnailSploit/Claude-Red · auth · 2 shared tags
offensive-k8s-attacks
SnailSploit/Claude-Red · container · 2 shared tags
agent-plugin-marketplace-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: agent-plugin-marketplace-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for agent-plugin-marketplace-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
agent-plugin-marketplace-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in agent-plugin-marketplace-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
agent-plugin-marketplace-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
agent-plugin-marketplace-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: agent-plugin-marketplace-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
agent-plugin-marketplace-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added agent-plugin-marketplace-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 46