wallet-policy

starchild-ai-agent/official-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/starchild-ai-agent/official-skills --skill wallet-policy
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Natural language wallet security policy generator for Privy-managed wallets.

  • Converts plain-language security requirements into Privy policy rule JSON, supporting transfer limits, address allowlists, method restrictions, chain constraints, and time windows
  • Covers both EVM (Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, etc.) and Solana chains with dedicated condition types for each ecosystem
  • Sends proposed policies to the frontend via wallet_propose_policy tool for user review and signature appr
skill.md

Wallet Policy Generator

You help users create wallet security policy rules. The user describes what they want in plain language, and you generate the exact Privy policy rules JSON. After generating the rules, you MUST call the wallet_propose_policy tool to send the proposal to the user for review and approval.

Always respond in the user's language.

Output Format

After generating the policy rules, call the wallet_propose_policy tool:

wallet_propose_policy(
  chain_type="ethereum",          # "ethereum" or "solana"
  title="Update EVM Wallet Policy",
  description="Allow transfers to treasury address",
  rules=[
    {
      "name": "Allow transfers to treasury",
      "method": "eth_sendTransaction",
      "conditions": [
        {
          "field_source": "ethereum_transaction",
          "field": "to",
          "operator": "eq",
          "value": "0x1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678"
        }
      ],
      "action": "ALLOW"
    }
  ]
)

The tool sends an action_request event to the frontend, which displays the proposed policy to the user for confirmation. The user must approve (and sign) before the policy is applied. Do NOT output rules as code blocks — always use the tool.

If the user's request covers both EVM and Solana, call wallet_propose_policy twice — once with chain_type="ethereum" and once with chain_type="solana".

CRITICAL — Tool invocation is mandatory:

  • You MUST call wallet_propose_policy for EVERY policy request. Never output rules as plain text or code blocks.
  • For dual-chain requests (both EVM and Solana), call the tool TWICE — once per chain_type.
  • The tool validates rules against the Privy API schema. If validation fails, fix the errors and retry.

Policy Engine Basics

Tell the user these fundamentals when relevant:

  1. Default allow-all — New wallets have NO policy (all transactions allowed). Policy is opt-in. Once a policy is attached, it switches to deny-by-default: any request that matches no rules is denied. An empty rules array = deny everything.
  2. DENY wins — If any DENY rule matches, the request is blocked even if ALLOW rules also match.
  3. Multiple conditions = AND — All conditions in a single rule must match for the rule to trigger.
  4. Multiple rules = evaluated in order — First matching DENY blocks; otherwise first matching ALLOW permits.
  5. Solana per-instruction — Every instruction in a Solana transaction must individually match an ALLOW rule.

Constructing Policy Rules

Default Approach: Wildcard Policy

For any on-chain service (Hyperliquid, Orderly, 1inch, or any new dapp), propose the standard wildcard policy:

wallet_propose_policy(
  chain_type="ethereum",
  title="Enable Wallet Operations",
  description="Allows all transactions and signing on all EVM chains. Only blocks private key export. The user signs each individual transaction for approval.",
  rules=[
    {
      "name": "Deny key export",
      "method": "exportPrivateKey",
      "conditions": [],
      "action": "DENY"
    },
    {
      "name": "Allow all operations",
      "method": "*",
      "conditions": [],
      "action": "ALLOW"
    }
  ]
)

This works because:

  • The wallet policy acts as a capability gate — the user's signature on the policy is explicit consent to enable on-chain operations
  • Individual transactions still require user approval in the frontend before execution
  • The DENY on exportPrivateKey prevents the most dangerous operation (key extraction)
  • The * wildcard covers all transaction types, signing methods, and chains — no service-specific rules needed

When to use specific rules instead: Only when the user explicitly requests tighter restrictions (e.g. "only allow transfers under 1 ETH", "only allow transactions on Arbitrum", "only allow this specific contract address"). In that case, use the rule-building reference below.

Building Custom Restrictive Rules

If the user wants tighter control, identify what transactions the service needs:

  • What contract addresses will be called? (the to field)
  • What chain will it operate on? (the chain_id)
  • What value will be sent? (native token amount in wei)
  • Does it need EIP-712 signing? (typed data for off-chain orders, permits)
  • Does it need token approvals? (ERC-20 approve calls to token contracts)

Map each transaction type to a policy rule:

Transaction type Rule pattern
Call a specific contract ethereum_transaction.to = contract address + chain_id = chain
ERC-20 token approval ethereum_transaction.value = "0" + chain_id = chain (approvals are zero-value calls to the token contract)
EIP-712 typed data signing ethereum_typed_data_domain.verifyingContract = contract address
Any transaction on a chain ethereum_transaction.chain_id = chain
Smart contract deployment Use wildcard pattern (deployments have no fixed to address)

Propose and Explain

Always use wallet_propose_policy to send the proposal to the user. In the description field, explain:

  • What the rules allow
  • What security tradeoffs exist (e.g. wildcard allows all operations, but each tx still requires user approval)

Complete Rule Schema

{
  "name": "string (1-50 chars, descriptive)",
  "method": "<method>",
  "conditions": [ <condition>, ... ],
  "action": "ALLOW" | "DENY"
}

Supported Methods

Method Chain Description
eth_sendTransaction EVM Broadcast a transaction
eth_signTransaction EVM Sign without broadcasting
eth_signTypedData_v4 EVM Sign EIP-712 typed data
eth_signUserOperation EVM Sign ERC-4337 UserOperation
eth_sign7702Authorization EVM EIP-7702 authorization
signTransaction Solana Sign a Solana transaction
signAndSendTransaction Solana Sign and broadcast
signTransactionBytes Tron/SUI Sign raw transaction bytes
exportPrivateKey Any Export the private key
* Any Wildcard — matches all methods

Note: personal_sign (message signing) and signMessage (Solana) are NOT valid policy methods. They cannot be individually allowed/denied. To allow message signing, use * wildcard. Under deny-all (empty rules), message signing is also blocked.

Condition Object

{
  "field_source": "<source>",
  "field": "<field_name>",
  "operator": "<op>",
  "value": "<string>" | ["<string>", ...]
}

Operators:

  • eq — equals (single value)
  • gt, gte, lt, lte — comparison operators (numeric string values)
  • in — matches any value in array (max 100 values). Use this for multiple addresses/values.

Do NOT use in_condition_set:

  • in_condition_set — This operator requires pre-created condition sets via Privy API, which you cannot create. Always use the in operator instead for arrays of addresses or values. If you need more than 100 values, split into multiple rules.

Examples:

// ✅ CORRECT: Multiple addresses with "in" operator
{"field": "to", "operator": "in", "value": ["0xAddr1...", "0xAddr2...", "0xAddr3..."]}

// ❌ WRONG: Do NOT use "in_condition_set" - you cannot create condition sets
{"field": "to", "operator": "in_condition_set", "value": "a2p4etpcbj2dltbjfigybi8j"}
{"field": "to", "operator": "in_condition_set", "value": ["0xAddr1...", "0xAddr2..."]}

// ✅ CORRECT: For many addresses, use multiple rules with "in" operator
// Rule 1: First 100 addresses
{"field": "to", "operator": "in", "value": ["0xAddr1...", "0xAddr2...", /* ... 100 addresses */]}
// Rule 2: Next batch
{"field": "to", "operator": "in", "value": ["0xAddr101...", "0xAddr102...", /* ... */]}

Condition Types Reference

1. ethereum_transaction

Fields: to, value, chain_id

{"field_source": "ethereum_transaction", "field": "to", "operator": "eq", "value": "0xAbC..."}
{"field_source": "ethereum_transaction", "field": "value", "operator": "lte", "value": "1000000000000000000"}
{"field_source": "ethereum_transaction", "field": "chain_id", "operator": "in", "value": ["1", "8453", "10"]}
  • value is in wei (string). 1 ETH = "1000000000000000000"
  • chain_id is string (e.g. "1" for mainnet, "8453" for Base)
  • to is checksummed address

2. ethereum_calldata

For decoded smart contract calls. Requires an abi field.

{
  "field_source": "ethereum_calldata",
  "field": "transfer.to",
  "operator": "eq",
  "value": "0xRecipient...",
  "abi": {
    "type": "function",
    "name": "transfer",
    "inputs": [
      {"name": "to", "type": "address"},
      {"name": "amount", "type": "uint256"}
    ]
  }
}

Field format: <functionName>.<paramName> — references decoded parameter.

3. ethereum_typed_data_domain

Fields: chainId, verifyingContract

{"field_source": "ethereum_typed_data_domain", "field": "verifyingContract", "operator": "eq", "value": "0xContract..."}
{"field_source": "ethereum_typed_data_domain", "field": 
how to use wallet-policy

How to use wallet-policy on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add wallet-policy
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/starchild-ai-agent/official-skills --skill wallet-policy

The skills CLI fetches wallet-policy from GitHub repository starchild-ai-agent/official-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/wallet-policy

Reload or restart Cursor to activate wallet-policy. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /wallet-policy) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.531 reviews
  • Aditi Abbas· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for wallet-policy matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend wallet-policy for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in wallet-policy — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Michael Ghosh· Nov 19, 2024

    We added wallet-policy from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Aditi White· Nov 3, 2024

    wallet-policy fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Valentina Chen· Oct 22, 2024

    wallet-policy is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 14, 2024

    wallet-policy has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Aanya Thomas· Oct 10, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: wallet-policy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aarav Haddad· Sep 25, 2024

    Registry listing for wallet-policy matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 21, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: wallet-policy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 31

1 / 4