Comprehensive guidance for configuring and using ShellCheck to improve shell script quality, catch common pitfalls, and enforce best practices through static code analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionshellcheck-configurationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches shellcheck-configuration from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate shellcheck-configuration. Access via /shellcheck-configuration in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
31.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
31.1K
stars
Comprehensive guidance for configuring and using ShellCheck to improve shell script quality, catch common pitfalls, and enforce best practices through static code analysis.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.ShellCheck is a static analysis tool that analyzes shell scripts and detects problematic patterns. It supports:
# macOS with Homebrew
brew install shellcheck
# Ubuntu/Debian
apt-get install shellcheck
# From source
git clone https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck.git
cd shellcheck
make build
make install
# Verify installation
shellcheck --version
Create .shellcheckrc in your project root:
# Specify target shell
shell=bash
# Enable optional checks
enable=avoid-nullary-conditions
enable=require-variable-braces
# Disable specific warnings
disable=SC1091
disable=SC2086
# Set default shell target
export SHELLCHECK_SHELL=bash
# Enable strict mode
export SHELLCHECK_STRICT=true
# Specify configuration file location
export SHELLCHECK_CONFIG=~/.shellcheckrc
# SC1004: Backslash continuation not followed by newline
echo hello\
world # Error - needs line continuation
# SC1008: Invalid data for operator `=='
if [[ $var = "value" ]]; then # Space before ==
true
fi
# SC2009: Consider using pgrep or pidof instead of grep|grep
ps aux | grep -v grep | grep myprocess # Use pgrep instead
# SC2012: Use `ls` only for viewing. Use `find` for reliable output
for file in $(ls -la) # Better: use find or globbing
# SC2015: Avoid using && and || instead of if-then-else
[[ -f "$file" ]] && echo "found" || echo "not found" # Less clear
# SC2016: Expressions don't expand in single quotes
echo '$VAR' # Literal $VAR, not variable expansion
# SC2026: This word is non-standard. Set POSIXLY_CORRECT
# when using with scripts for other shells
# SC2086: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
for i in $list; do # Should be: for i in $list or for i in "$list"
echo "$i"
done
# SC2115: Literal tilde in path not expanded. Use $HOME instead
~/.bashrc # In strings, use "$HOME/.bashrc"
# SC2181: Check exit code directly with `if`, not indirectly in a list
some_command
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then # Better: if some_command; then
# SC2206: Quote to prevent word splitting or set IFS
array=( $items ) # Should use: array=( $items )
# SC3010: In POSIX sh, use 'case' instead of 'cond && foo'
[[ $var == "value" ]] && do_something # Not POSIX
# SC3043: In POSIX sh, use 'local' is undefined
function my_func() {
local var=value # Not POSIX in some shells
}
#!/bin/bash
# Configure for maximum portability
shellcheck \
--shell=sh \
--external-sources \
--check-sourced \
script.sh
#!/bin/bash
# Configure for Bash development
shellcheck \
--shell=bash \
--exclude=SC1091,SC2119 \
--enable=all \
script.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -Eeuo pipefail
# Analyze all shell scripts and fail on issues
find . -type f -name "*.sh" | while read -r script; do
echo "Checking: $script"
shellcheck \
--shell=bash \
--format=gcc \
--exclude=SC1091 \
"$script" || exit 1
done
# Shell dialect to analyze against
shell=bash
# Enable optional checks
enable=avoid-nullary-conditions,require-variable-braces,check-unassigned-uppercase
# Disable specific warnings
# SC1091: Not following sourced files (many false positives)
disable=SC1091
# SC2119: Use function_name instead of function_name -- (arguments)
disable=SC2119
# External files to source for context
external-sources=true
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
#!/bin/bash
set -e
# Find all shell scripts changed in this commit
git diff --cached --name-only | grep '\.sh$' | while read -r script; do
echo "Linting: $script"
if ! shellcheck "$script"; then
echo "ShellCheck failed on $script"
exit 1
fi
done
name: ShellCheck
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
shellcheck:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Run ShellCheck
run: |
sudo apt-get install shellcheck
find . -type f -name "*.sh" -exec shellcheck {} \;
shellcheck:
stage: lint
image: koalaman/shellcheck-alpine
script:
- find . -type f -name "*.sh" -exec shellcheck {} \;
allow_failure: false
#!/bin/bash
# Disable warning for entire line
# shellcheck disable=SC2086
for file in $(ls -la); do
echo "$file"
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
antigravity-design-expert
182sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Frontendsame repogrill-me
648mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★69 reviews- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for shellcheck-configuration matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- BBenjamin Rahman★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: shellcheck-configuration is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- NNia Gonzalez★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
shellcheck-configuration has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- IIra Menon★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
shellcheck-configuration reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- LLuis Khan★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
shellcheck-configuration fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- IIsabella Patel★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
We added shellcheck-configuration from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- MMaya Chawla★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: shellcheck-configuration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLuis Nasser★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for shellcheck-configuration matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: shellcheck-configuration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLuis Haddad★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
shellcheck-configuration is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 69
1 / 7Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.