conductor-new-track▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Create a new track (feature, bug fix, chore, or refactor) with a detailed specification and phased implementation plan.
New Track
Create a new track (feature, bug fix, chore, or refactor) with a detailed specification and phased implementation plan.
Use this skill when
- Working on new track tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for new track
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to new track
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Pre-flight Checks
-
Verify Conductor is initialized:
- Check
conductor/product.mdexists - Check
conductor/tech-stack.mdexists - Check
conductor/workflow.mdexists - If missing: Display error and suggest running
/conductor:setupfirst
- Check
-
Load context files:
- Read
conductor/product.mdfor product context - Read
conductor/tech-stack.mdfor technical context - Read
conductor/workflow.mdfor TDD/commit preferences
- Read
Track Classification
Determine track type based on description or ask user:
What type of track is this?
1. Feature - New functionality
2. Bug - Fix for existing issue
3. Chore - Maintenance, dependencies, config
4. Refactor - Code improvement without behavior change
Interactive Specification Gathering
CRITICAL RULES:
- Ask ONE question per turn
- Wait for user response before proceeding
- Tailor questions based on track type
- Maximum 6 questions total
For Feature Tracks
Q1: Feature Summary
Describe the feature in 1-2 sentences.
[If argument provided, confirm: "You want to: {argument}. Is this correct?"]
Q2: User Story
Who benefits and how?
Format: As a [user type], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
Q3: Acceptance Criteria
What must be true for this feature to be complete?
List 3-5 acceptance criteria (one per line):
Q4: Dependencies
Does this depend on any existing code, APIs, or other tracks?
1. No dependencies
2. Depends on existing code (specify)
3. Depends on incomplete track (specify)
Q5: Scope Boundaries
What is explicitly OUT of scope for this track?
(Helps prevent scope creep)
Q6: Technical Considerations (optional)
Any specific technical approach or constraints?
(Press enter to skip)
For Bug Tracks
Q1: Bug Summary
What is broken?
[If argument provided, confirm]
Q2: Steps to Reproduce
How can this bug be reproduced?
List steps:
Q3: Expected vs Actual Behavior
What should happen vs what actually happens?
Q4: Affected Areas
What parts of the system are affected?
Q5: Root Cause Hypothesis (optional)
Any hypothesis about the cause?
(Press enter to skip)
For Chore/Refactor Tracks
Q1: Task Summary
What needs to be done?
[If argument provided, confirm]
Q2: Motivation
Why is this work needed?
Q3: Success Criteria
How will we know this is complete?
Q4: Risk Assessment
What could go wrong? Any risky changes?
Track ID Generation
Generate track ID in format: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
- Extract shortname from feature/bug summary (2-3 words, lowercase, hyphenated)
- Use current date
- Example:
user-auth_20250115,nav-bug_20250115
Validate uniqueness:
- Check
conductor/tracks.mdfor existing IDs - If collision, append counter:
user-auth_20250115_2
Specification Generation
Create conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md:
# Specification: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Type:** {Feature|Bug|Chore|Refactor}
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** Draft
## Summary
{1-2 sentence summary}
## Context
{Product context from product.md relevant to this track}
## User Story (for features)
As a {user}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
## Problem Description (for bugs)
{Bug description, steps to reproduce}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Criterion 1}
- [ ] {Criterion 2}
- [ ] {Criterion 3}
## Dependencies
{List dependencies or "None"}
## Out of Scope
{Explicit exclusions}
## Technical Notes
{Technical considerations or "None specified"}
---
_Generated by Conductor. Review and edit as needed._
User Review of Spec
Display the generated spec and ask:
Here is the specification I've generated:
{spec content}
Is this specification correct?
1. Yes, proceed to plan generation
2. No, let me edit (opens for inline edits)
3. Start over with different inputs
Plan Generation
After spec approval, generate conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md:
Plan Structure
# Implementation Plan: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Spec:** spec.md
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** [ ] Not Started
## Overview
{Brief summary of implementation approach}
## Phase 1: {Phase Name}
{Phase description}
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 1.1: {Description}
- [ ] Task 1.2: {Description}
- [ ] Task 1.3: {Description}
### Verification
- [ ] {Verification step for phase 1}
## Phase 2: {Phase Name}
{Phase description}
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 2.1: {Description}
- [ ] Task 2.2: {Description}
### Verification
- [ ] {Verification step for phase 2}
## Phase 3: {Phase Name} (if needed)
...
## Final Verification
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated (if applicable)
- [ ] Ready for review
---
_Generated by Conductor. Tasks will be marked [~] in progress and [x] complete._
Phase Guidelines
- Group related tasks into logical phases
- Each phase should be independently verifiable
- Include verification task after each phase
- TDD tracks: Include test writing tasks before implementation tasks
- Typical structure:
- Setup/Foundation - Initial scaffolding, interfaces
- Core Implementation - Main functionality
- Integration - Connect with existing system
- Polish - Error handling, edge cases, docs
User Review of Plan
Display the generated plan and ask:
Here is the implementation plan:
{plan content}
Is this plan correct?
1. Yes, create the track
2. No, let me edit (opens for inline edits)
3. Add more phases/tasks
4. Start over
Track Creation
After plan approval:
-
Create directory structure:
conductor/tracks/{trackId}/ ├── spec.md ├── plan.md ├── metadata.json └── index.md -
Create
metadata.json:{ "id": "{trackId}", "title": "{Track Title}", "type": "feature|bug|chore|refactor", "status": "pending", "created": "ISO_TIMESTAMP", "updated": "ISO_TIMESTAMP", "phases": { "total": N, "completed": 0 }, "tasks": { "total": M, "completed": 0 } } -
Create
index.md:# Track: {Track Title} **ID:** {trackId} **Status:** Pending ## Documents - Specification - Implementation Plan ## Progress - Phases: 0/{N} complete - Tasks: 0/{M} complete ## Quick Links - Back to Tracks - Product Context -
Register in
conductor/tracks.md:- Add row to tracks table
- Format:
| [ ] | {trackId} | {title} | {created} | {created} |
-
Update
conductor/index.md:- Add track to "Active Tracks" section
Completion Message
Track created successfully!
Track ID: {trackId}
Location: conductor/tracks/{trackId}/
Files created:
- spec.md - Requirements specification
- plan.md - Phased implementation plan
- metadata.json - Track metadata
- index.md - Track navigation
Next steps:
1. Review spec.md and plan.md, make any edits
2. Run /conductor:implement {trackId} to start implementation
3. Run /conductor:status to see project progress
Error Handling
- If directory creation fails: Halt and report, do not register in tracks.md
- If any file write fails: Clean up partial track, report error
- If tracks.md update fails: Warn user to manually register track
How to use conductor-new-track on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add conductor-new-track
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches conductor-new-track from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate conductor-new-track. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /conductor-new-track) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★43 reviews- ★★★★★Valentina Nasser· Dec 24, 2024
conductor-new-track is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conductor-new-track is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Arjun Garcia· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in conductor-new-track — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ava Robinson· Dec 8, 2024
We added conductor-new-track from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Zara Mensah· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conductor-new-track is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 3, 2024
We added conductor-new-track from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Arjun Liu· Nov 3, 2024
Registry listing for conductor-new-track matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 22, 2024
conductor-new-track fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Hana Park· Oct 22, 2024
conductor-new-track reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Tariq Garcia· Oct 18, 2024
conductor-new-track has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 43