conductor-implement▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan, following the workflow rules defined in conductor/workflow.md.
Implement Track
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan, following the workflow rules defined in conductor/workflow.md.
Use this skill when
- Working on implement track tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for implement track
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to implement track
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Pre-flight Checks
-
Verify Conductor is initialized:
- Check
conductor/product.mdexists - Check
conductor/workflow.mdexists - Check
conductor/tracks.mdexists - If missing: Display error and suggest running
/conductor:setupfirst
- Check
-
Load workflow configuration:
- Read
conductor/workflow.md - Parse TDD strictness level
- Parse commit strategy
- Parse verification checkpoint rules
- Read
Track Selection
If argument provided:
- Validate track exists:
conductor/tracks/{argument}/plan.md - If not found: Search for partial matches, suggest corrections
If no argument:
-
Read
conductor/tracks.md -
Parse for incomplete tracks (status
[ ]or[~]) -
Display selection menu:
Select a track to implement: In Progress: 1. [~] auth_20250115 - User Authentication (Phase 2, Task 3) Pending: 2. [ ] nav-fix_20250114 - Navigation Bug Fix 3. [ ] dashboard_20250113 - Dashboard Feature Enter number or track ID:
Context Loading
Load all relevant context for implementation:
-
Track documents:
conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md- Requirementsconductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md- Task listconductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json- Progress state
-
Project context:
conductor/product.md- Product understandingconductor/tech-stack.md- Technical constraintsconductor/workflow.md- Process rules
-
Code style (if exists):
conductor/code_styleguides/{language}.md
Track Status Update
Update track to in-progress:
-
In
conductor/tracks.md:- Change
[ ]to[~]for this track
- Change
-
In
conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json:- Set
status: "in_progress" - Update
updatedtimestamp
- Set
Task Execution Loop
For each incomplete task in plan.md (marked with [ ]):
1. Task Identification
Parse plan.md to find next incomplete task:
- Look for lines matching
- [ ] Task X.Y: {description} - Track current phase from structure
2. Task Start
Mark task as in-progress:
- Update plan.md: Change
[ ]to[~]for current task - Announce: "Starting Task X.Y: {description}"
3. TDD Workflow (if TDD enabled in workflow.md)
Red Phase - Write Failing Test:
Following TDD workflow for Task X.Y...
Step 1: Writing failing test
- Create test file if needed
- Write test(s) for the task functionality
- Run tests to confirm they fail
- If tests pass unexpectedly: HALT, investigate
Green Phase - Implement:
Step 2: Implementing minimal code to pass test
- Write minimum code to make test pass
- Run tests to confirm they pass
- If tests fail: Debug and fix
Refactor Phase:
Step 3: Refactoring while keeping tests green
- Clean up code
- Run tests to ensure still passing
4. Non-TDD Workflow (if TDD not strict)
- Implement the task directly
- Run any existing tests
- Manual verification as needed
5. Task Completion
Commit changes (following commit strategy from workflow.md):
git add -A
git commit -m "{commit_prefix}: {task description} ({trackId})"
Update plan.md:
- Change
[~]to[x]for completed task - Commit plan update:
git add conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md
git commit -m "chore: mark task X.Y complete ({trackId})"
Update metadata.json:
- Increment
tasks.completed - Update
updatedtimestamp
6. Phase Completion Check
After each task, check if phase is complete:
- Parse plan.md for phase structure
- If all tasks in current phase are
[x]:
Run phase verification:
Phase {N} complete. Running verification...
- Execute verification tasks listed for the phase
- Run full test suite:
npm test/pytest/ etc.
Report and wait for approval:
Phase {N} Verification Results:
- All phase tasks: Complete
- Tests: {passing/failing}
- Verification: {pass/fail}
Approve to continue to Phase {N+1}?
1. Yes, continue
2. No, there are issues to fix
3. Pause implementation
CRITICAL: Wait for explicit user approval before proceeding to next phase.
Error Handling During Implementation
On Tool Failure
ERROR: {tool} failed with: {error message}
Options:
1. Retry the operation
2. Skip this task and continue
3. Pause implementation
4. Revert current task changes
- HALT and present options
- Do NOT automatically continue
On Test Failure
TESTS FAILING after Task X.Y
Failed tests:
- {test name}: {failure reason}
Options:
1. Attempt to fix
2. Rollback task changes
3. Pause for manual intervention
On Git Failure
GIT ERROR: {error message}
This may indicate:
- Uncommitted changes from outside Conductor
- Merge conflicts
- Permission issues
Options:
1. Show git status
2. Attempt to resolve
3. Pause for manual intervention
Track Completion
When all phases and tasks are complete:
1. Final Verification
All tasks complete. Running final verification...
- Run full test suite
- Check all acceptance criteria from spec.md
- Generate verification report
2. Update Track Status
In conductor/tracks.md:
- Change
[~]to[x]for this track - Update the "Updated" column
In conductor/tracks/{trackId}/metadata.json:
- Set
status: "complete" - Set
phases.completedto total - Set
tasks.completedto total - Update
updatedtimestamp
In conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md:
- Update header status to
[x] Complete
3. Documentation Sync Offer
Track complete! Would you like to sync documentation?
This will update:
- conductor/product.md (if new features added)
- conductor/tech-stack.md (if new dependencies added)
- README.md (if applicable)
1. Yes, sync documentation
2. No, skip
4. Cleanup Offer
Track {trackId} is complete.
Cleanup options:
1. Archive - Move to conductor/tracks/_archive/
2. Delete - Remove track directory
3. Keep - Leave as-is
5. Completion Summary
Track Complete: {track title}
Summary:
- Track ID: {trackId}
- Phases completed: {N}/{N}
- Tasks completed: {M}/{M}
- Commits created: {count}
- Tests: All passing
Next steps:
- Run /conductor:status to see project progress
- Run /conductor:new-track for next feature
Progress Tracking
Maintain progress in metadata.json throughout:
{
"id": "auth_20250115",
"title": "User Authentication",
"type": "feature",
"status": "in_progress",
"created": "2025-01-15T10:00:00Z",
"updated": "2025-01-15T14:30:00Z",
"current_phase": 2,
"current_task": "2.3",
"phases": {
"total": 3,
"completed": 1
},
"tasks": {
"total": 12,
"completed": 7
},
"commits": [
"abc1234: feat: add login form (auth_20250115)",
"def5678: feat: add password validation (auth_20250115)"
]
}
Resumption
If implementation is paused and resumed:
-
Load
metadata.jsonfor current state -
Find current task from
current_taskfield -
Check if task is
[~]in plan.md -
Ask user:
Resuming track: {title} Last task in progress: Task {X.Y}: {description} Options: 1. Continue from where we left off 2. Restart current task 3. Show progress summary first
Critical Rules
- NEVER skip verification checkpoints - Always wait for user approval between phases
- STOP on any failure - Do not attempt to continue past errors
- Follow workflow.md strictly - TDD, commit strategy, and verification rules are mandatory
- Keep plan.md updated - Task status must reflect actual progress
- Commit frequently - Each task completion should be committed
- Track all commits - Record commit hashes in metadata.json for potential revert
How to use conductor-implement on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add conductor-implement
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches conductor-implement from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate conductor-implement. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /conductor-implement) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★69 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conductor-implement is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kwame Jain· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conductor-implement is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Neel Torres· Dec 20, 2024
conductor-implement reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noor Huang· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for conductor-implement matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Diego Farah· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in conductor-implement — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Yuki Chen· Dec 4, 2024
conductor-implement has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Camila Ndlovu· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for conductor-implement matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Patel· Nov 23, 2024
conductor-implement fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
We added conductor-implement from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Xiao Malhotra· Nov 15, 2024
We added conductor-implement from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 69