architecture-patterns

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill architecture-patterns
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems.

skill.md

Architecture Patterns

Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems.

Use this skill when

  • Designing new backend systems from scratch
  • Refactoring monolithic applications for better maintainability
  • Establishing architecture standards for your team
  • Migrating from tightly coupled to loosely coupled architectures
  • Implementing domain-driven design principles
  • Creating testable and mockable codebases
  • Planning microservices decomposition

Do not use this skill when

  • You only need small, localized refactors
  • The system is primarily frontend with no backend architecture changes
  • You need implementation details without architectural design

Instructions

  1. Clarify domain boundaries, constraints, and scalability targets.
  2. Select an architecture pattern that fits the domain complexity.
  3. Define module boundaries, interfaces, and dependency rules.
  4. Provide migration steps and validation checks.
  5. For workflows that must survive failures (payments, order fulfillment, multi-step processes), use durable execution at the infrastructure layer — frameworks like DBOS persist workflow state, providing crash recovery without adding architectural complexity.

Refer to resources/implementation-playbook.md for detailed patterns, checklists, and templates.

Related Skills

Works well with: event-sourcing-architect, saga-orchestration, workflow-automation, dbos-*

Resources

  • resources/implementation-playbook.md for detailed patterns, checklists, and templates.
how to use architecture-patterns

How to use architecture-patterns on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add architecture-patterns
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill architecture-patterns

The skills CLI fetches architecture-patterns from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/architecture-patterns

Reload or restart Cursor to activate architecture-patterns. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /architecture-patterns) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.829 reviews
  • Chinedu Malhotra· Dec 12, 2024

    I recommend architecture-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yusuf Kapoor· Nov 3, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: architecture-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Yusuf Sharma· Oct 22, 2024

    architecture-patterns has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Alexander Iyer· Oct 10, 2024

    architecture-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 25, 2024

    I recommend architecture-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Alexander Kim· Sep 5, 2024

    I recommend architecture-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Alexander Chen· Sep 1, 2024

    architecture-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Zara Martinez· Aug 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in architecture-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Alexander Gupta· Aug 20, 2024

    We added architecture-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Aug 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in architecture-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 29

1 / 3