mvp-architect▌
shipshitdev/library · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Help indie founders scope the smallest possible product that validates their core hypothesis using Hexa's methodology. Get to market in 3 months or less.
MVP Architect - Minimum Viable Product Scoping
Overview
Help indie founders scope the smallest possible product that validates their core hypothesis using Hexa's methodology. Get to market in 3 months or less.
Hexa's Core Principle: "Launch an MVP with key high-value features within 3 months. It's better to launch with clear, easily understood features, even if they aren't at full power yet."
When This Activates
- "What should my MVP include"
- "Help me scope my MVP"
- "What features do I need"
- "What to build first"
- "Been building for months, haven't launched"
Hexa's 7 Principles
- Dig Beyond User Requests — Root needs, not surface wants
- Combat Confirmation Bias — Challenge assumptions
- Partner with Design Partners Early — Build with real users
- Prioritize Adaptable Milestones — 6-month goals, 2-week sprints
- Sketch Before Designing — Keep ugly until validated
- Build Around Dry Elements — Only include stable features
- Stress-Test Architecture — Database design affects everything
Quick Workflow
Step 1: Problem Clarity Check
- 10+ customer interviews?
- One-sentence problem?
- 3-5 design partners?
Step 2: Core Hypothesis
We believe that [customer] has a problem with [pain point].
We believe that [solution] will solve this.
We will know we're right when [success metric].
Step 3: Feature Prioritization
For each feature ask:
- Tests core hypothesis? → Keep
- Users explicitly asked? → Maybe
- Critical path? → Keep
- Can do manually? → Don't build
Target: 3-5 features maximum.
Step 4: Dry Elements Test
Only build features that remained stable through ALL design partner feedback.
Step 5: User Journey (3-4 Screens)
- How do users sign up?
- First action?
- Core value delivery?
- Success confirmation?
Anti-Scope Creep Checklist
Before adding ANY feature:
- Does this test our core hypothesis? → If no, cut it
- Have 3+ design partners asked? → If no, defer it
- Can we launch without this? → If yes, defer it
- Can we do this manually first? → If yes, don't build it
- Will this delay launch by >3 days? → If yes, cut it
The "Launch in 2 Weeks" Test
If you HAD to launch in 2 weeks, what would you cut? Whatever you'd cut... cut it now. That's your real MVP.
Integration
idea-validator- Validate before scopingstartup-icp-definer- Define who you're building forfullstack-workspace-init- Set up codebasebrand-architect- Name and position product
For complete hypothesis framework, feature prioritization matrix, dry elements identification, screen mapping, technical architecture checklist, timeline templates, and output format, see: references/full-guide.md
How to use mvp-architect on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add mvp-architect
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches mvp-architect from GitHub repository shipshitdev/library and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate mvp-architect. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /mvp-architect) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★69 reviews- ★★★★★Piyush G· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: mvp-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Zaid Ndlovu· Dec 28, 2024
mvp-architect is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sophia Rahman· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for mvp-architect matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Anderson· Dec 12, 2024
mvp-architect reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ishan Farah· Dec 8, 2024
We added mvp-architect from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Zaid Jain· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: mvp-architect is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ama Wang· Nov 27, 2024
mvp-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Nov 19, 2024
mvp-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Li Ndlovu· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: mvp-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sophia Mehta· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in mvp-architect — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 69