golang-safety
Persona: You are a defensive Go engineer. You treat every untested assumption about nil, capacity, and numeric range as a latent crash waiting to happen.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
1.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
1.0K
stars
Installation Guide
How to use golang-safety on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
golang-safety
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches golang-safety from samber/cc-skills-golang and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate golang-safety. Access via /golang-safety in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Persona: You are a defensive Go engineer. You treat every untested assumption about nil, capacity, and numeric range as a latent crash waiting to happen.
Go Safety: Correctness & Defensive Coding
Prevents programmer mistakes — bugs, panics, and silent data corruption in normal (non-adversarial) code. Security handles attackers; safety handles ourselves.
Best Practices Summary
- Prefer generics over
anywhen the type set is known — compiler catches mismatches instead of runtime panics - Always use comma-ok for type assertions — bare assertions panic on mismatch
- Typed nil pointer in an interface is not
== nil— the type descriptor makes it non-nil - Writing to a nil map panics — always initialize before use
appendmay reuse the backing array — both slices share memory if capacity allows, silently corrupting each other- Return defensive copies from exported functions — otherwise callers mutate your internals
deferruns at function exit, not loop iteration — extract loop body to a function- Integer conversions truncate silently —
int64toint32wraps without error - Float arithmetic is not exact — use epsilon comparison or
math/big - Design useful zero values — nil map fields panic on first write; use lazy init
- Use
sync.Oncefor lazy init — guarantees exactly-once even under concurrency
Nil Safety
Nil-related panics are the most common crash in Go.
The nil interface trap
Interfaces store (type, value). An interface is nil only when both are nil. Returning a typed nil pointer sets the type descriptor, making it non-nil:
// ✗ Dangerous — interface{type: *MyHandler, value: nil} is not == nil
func getHandler() http.Handler {
var h *MyHandler // nil pointer
if !enabled {
return h // interface{type: *MyHandler, value: nil} != nil
}
return h
}
// ✓ Good — return nil explicitly
func getHandler() http.Handler {
if !enabled {
return nil // interface{type: nil, value: nil} == nil
}
return &MyHandler{}
}
Nil map, slice, and channel behavior
| Type | Read from nil | Write to nil | Len/Cap of nil | Range over nil |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map | Zero value | panic | 0 | 0 iterations |
| Slice | panic (index) | panic (index) | 0 | 0 iterations |
| Channel | Blocks forever | Blocks forever | 0 | Blocks forever |
// ✗ Bad — nil map panics on write
var m map[string]int
m["key"] = 1
// ✓ Good — initialize or lazy-init in methods
m := make(map[string]int)
func (r *Registry) Add(name string, val int) {
if r.items == nil { r.items = make(map[string]int) }
r.items[name] = val
}
See Nil Safety Deep Dive for nil receivers, nil in generics, and nil interface performance.
Slice & Map Safety
Slice aliasing — the append trap
append reuses the backing array if capacity allows. Both slices then share memory:
// ✗ Dangerous — a and b share backing array
a := make([]int, 3, 5)
b := append(a, 4)
b[0] = 99 // also modifies a[0]
// ✓ Good — full slice expression forces new allocation
b := append(a[:len(a):len(a)], 4)
Map concurrent access
Maps MUST NOT be accessed concurrently — → see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency for sync primitives.
See Slice and Map Deep Dive for range pitfalls, subslice memory retention, and slices.Clone/maps.Clone.
Numeric Safety
Implicit type conversions truncate silently
// ✗ Bad — silently wraps around if val > math.MaxInt32 (3B becomes -1.29B)
var val int64 = 3_000_000_000
i32 := int32(val) // -1294967296 (silent wraparound)
// ✓ Good — check before converting
if val > math.MaxInt32 || val < math.MinInt32 {
return fmt.Errorf("value %d overflows int32", val)
}
i32 := int32(val)
Float comparison
// ✗ Bad — floating point arithmetic is not exact
0.1+0.2 == 0.3 // false
// ✓ Good — use epsilon comparison
const epsilon = 1e-9
math.Abs((0.1+0.2)-0.3) < epsilon // true
Division by zero
Integer division by zero panics. Float division by zero produces +Inf, -Inf, or NaN.
func avg(total, count int) (int, error) {
if count == 0 {
return 0, errors.New("division by zero")
}
return total / count, nil
}
For integer overflow as a security vulnerability, see the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security skill section.
Resource Safety
defer in loops — resource accumulation
defer runs at function exit, not loop iteration. Resources accumulate until the function returns:
// ✗ Bad — all files stay open until function returns
for _, path := range paths {
f, _ := os.Open(path)
defer f.Close() // deferred until function exits
process(f)
}
// ✓ Good — extract to function so defer runs per iteration
for _, path := range paths {
if err := processOne(path); err != nil { return err }
}
func processOne(path string) error {
f, err := os.Open(path)
if err != nil { return err }
defer f.Close()
return process(f)
}
Goroutine leaks
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency for goroutine lifecycle and leak prevention.
Immutability & Defensive Copying
Exported functions returning slices/maps SHOULD return defensive copies.
Protecting struct internals
// ✗ Bad — exported slice field, anyone can mutate
type Config struct {
Hosts []string
}
// ✓ Good — unexported field with accessor returning a copy
type Config struct {
hosts []string
}
func (c *Config) Hosts() []string {
return slices.Clone(c.hosts)
}
Initialization Safety
Zero-value design
Design types so var x MyType is safe — prevents "forgot to initialize" bugs:
var mu sync.Mutex // ✓ usable at zero value
var buf bytes.Buffer // ✓ usable at zero value
// ✗ Bad — nil map panics on write
type Cache struct { data map[string]any }
sync.Once for lazy initialization
type DB struct {
once sync.Once
conn *sql.DB
}
func (db *DB) connection() *sqlList & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Get started →Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
golang-testing
6samber/cc-skills-golang
golang-architect
6tomlord1122/tomtom-skill
typescript-best-practices
96jwynia/agent-skills
java-springboot
42github/awesome-copilot
google-search-console
41kostja94/marketing-skills
python-expert-best-practices-code-review
34wispbit-ai/skills
Reviews
- AAditi Ghosh★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
I recommend golang-safety for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Sep 25, 2024
I recommend golang-safety for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- PPiyush G★★★★★Sep 17, 2024
golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ZZara Johnson★★★★★Sep 17, 2024
golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ZZara Shah★★★★★Sep 1, 2024
Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ZZara Jackson★★★★★Aug 20, 2024
golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Aug 16, 2024
Useful defaults in golang-safety — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Aug 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ZZara Sharma★★★★★Aug 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Jul 27, 2024
Registry listing for golang-safety matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 27
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.