app-store-review

safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill --skill app-store-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Comprehensive guide for evaluating iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS app code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. This skill covers EVERY guideline point to identify potential rejection issues before submission.

skill.md

App Store Review Guidelines Checker

Comprehensive guide for evaluating iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS app code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. This skill covers EVERY guideline point to identify potential rejection issues before submission.

Supports: Swift, Objective-C, React Native, and Expo apps

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

  • Preparing an app for App Store submission
  • Reviewing code for compliance issues
  • Implementing features that may trigger review concerns
  • Auditing existing apps for guideline violations
  • Building features involving payments, user data, or sensitive content

Guideline Sections

Read individual rule files for detailed explanations, checklists, and code examples:

Section File Key Topics
1. Safety rules/1-safety.md Objectionable content, UGC moderation, Kids Category, physical harm, data security
2. Performance rules/2-performance.md App completeness, metadata accuracy, hardware compatibility, software requirements
3. Business rules/3-business.md In-app purchase, subscriptions, cryptocurrencies, other business models
4. Design rules/4-design.md Copycats, minimum functionality, spam, extensions, Apple services, login
5. Legal rules/5-legal.md Privacy, data collection, intellectual property, gambling, VPN, MDM

Risk Levels by Category

Risk Level Category Section Common Rejection Reasons
CRITICAL Privacy & Data 5.1 Missing privacy policy, unauthorized data collection
CRITICAL Payments 3.1 Bypassing in-app purchase, unclear pricing
HIGH Safety 1.x Objectionable content, inadequate UGC moderation
HIGH Performance 2.x Crashes, incomplete features, deprecated APIs
MEDIUM Design 4.x Copycat apps, minimum functionality issues
MEDIUM Legal 5.x IP violations, gambling without license

Quick Reference: High-Risk Rejection Patterns

Critical Issues (Immediate Rejection)

Swift:

// 🔴 Private API usage
let selector = NSSelectorFromString("_privateMethod")

// 🔴 Hardcoded secrets
let apiKey = "sk_live_xxxxx"

// 🔴 External payment for digital goods
func purchaseDigitalContent() {
    openStripeCheckout() // Use StoreKit instead
}

React Native / Expo:

// 🔴 Hardcoded secrets in JS bundle
const API_KEY = 'sk_live_xxxxx'; // REJECTION

// 🔴 External payment for digital goods
Linking.openURL('https://stripe.com/checkout'); // Use react-native-iap

// 🔴 Dynamic code execution
eval(downloadedCode); // REJECTION

// 🔴 Major feature changes via CodePush/expo-updates
// OTA updates for bug fixes only, not new features!

High-Risk Issues

Swift:

// 🟡 Missing ATT when using ad SDKs
import FacebookAds // Without ATTrackingManager

// 🟡 Account creation without deletion
func createAccount() { } // But no deleteAccount()

React Native / Expo:

// 🟡 Missing ATT (use expo-tracking-transparency)
import analytics from '@react-native-firebase/analytics';
analytics().logEvent('event'); // Without ATT prompt = REJECTION

// 🟡 Account deletion via website only
Linking.openURL('https://example.com/delete'); // Must be in-app!

// 🟡 Social login without Sign in with Apple
<GoogleSigninButton /> // Must also offer Apple login!

Medium-Risk Issues

// 🟠 Vague purpose strings in Info.plist
"This app needs camera access" // Be specific!

// 🟠 WebView-only app (insufficient native functionality)
const App = () => <WebView source={{ uri: 'https://site.com' }} />;

// 🟠 References to Android in iOS app
const text = "Also available on Android"; // REJECTION

// 🟠 console.log in production
console.log('debug'); // Remove or wrap in __DEV__

Pre-Submission Checklist

Privacy (Section 5.1)

  • Privacy policy link in App Store Connect
  • Privacy policy link accessible within app
  • All purpose strings are specific and accurate
  • App Privacy details completed in App Store Connect
  • ATT implemented if tracking users
  • Account deletion available if accounts exist
  • Data minimization - only requesting necessary permissions
  • User consent obtained before data collection

Payments (Section 3.1)

  • StoreKit used for all digital purchases
  • Restore purchases implemented
  • Subscription terms clearly displayed
  • Loot box odds disclosed if applicable
  • No external payment for digital goods (unless entitled)
  • Credits/currencies don't expire

Safety (Section 1.x)

  • No objectionable content
  • UGC moderation implemented (filter, report, block, contact)
  • Parental gates for Kids Category apps
  • No false information or prank features
  • Medical disclaimers if applicable
  • No substance promotion

Performance (Section 2.x)

  • No crashes or bugs
  • All features complete and functional
  • No placeholder content
  • IPv6 tested and functional
  • Demo account provided if needed
  • Using only public APIs
  • No deprecated APIs
  • Proper background mode usage

Design (Section 4.x)

  • Sufficient native functionality (not just web wrapper)
  • No copycat concerns
  • Original app name and branding
  • Extensions comply with guidelines
  • Login alternatives if using social login
  • Not monetizing built-in capabilities

Legal (Section 5.x)

  • No unlicensed third-party content
  • Proper Apple trademark usage
  • Gambling license if applicable
  • VPN uses NEVPNManager API
  • COPPA/GDPR compliance for kids

References

how to use app-store-review

How to use app-store-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add app-store-review
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill --skill app-store-review

The skills CLI fetches app-store-review from GitHub repository safaiyeh/app-store-review-skill and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/app-store-review

Reload or restart Cursor to activate app-store-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /app-store-review) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.663 reviews
  • Ira Menon· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: app-store-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Benjamin Bhatia· Dec 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: app-store-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Ira Ghosh· Dec 16, 2024

    app-store-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024

    app-store-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Diego Abbas· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in app-store-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Diego Robinson· Nov 27, 2024

    app-store-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Charlotte Abbas· Nov 27, 2024

    app-store-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Benjamin Ghosh· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend app-store-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Daniel Sethi· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in app-store-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Diego Rahman· Nov 3, 2024

    We added app-store-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 63

1 / 7