contract-analyzer▌
onewave-ai/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Intelligent contract review highlighting risks, key terms, and unusual provisions.
Contract Analyzer
Intelligent contract review highlighting risks, key terms, and unusual provisions.
When to Use This Skill
Activate when the user:
- Provides a contract or agreement to review
- Asks "review this contract"
- Needs to understand contract terms
- Wants concerning clauses identified
- Mentions NDA, employment agreement, freelance contract
- Needs to compare contract terms
- Asks about legal document analysis
⚠️ Important Disclaimers
Include this disclaimer in every output:
⚠️ Legal Disclaimer: This is informational analysis only, not legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal matters. Contract interpretation can be complex and jurisdiction-specific.
Instructions
-
Identify Contract Type
- Employment agreement
- Independent contractor/freelance agreement
- Non-disclosure agreement (NDA)
- Service agreement
- Partnership agreement
- Software license
- Real estate agreement
- Purchase agreement
-
Extract Key Terms
Financial Terms:
- Payment amount and schedule
- Rate increases or bonuses
- Expense reimbursement
- Late payment penalties
- Price adjustments
Duration and Termination:
- Contract length
- Renewal terms (automatic or manual)
- Termination conditions
- Notice period required
- Termination fees or penalties
Intellectual Property:
- Work-for-hire provisions
- IP ownership (who owns what)
- IP assignment clauses
- License grants
- Pre-existing IP protections
Liability and Indemnification:
- Liability caps
- Indemnification obligations
- Insurance requirements
- Warranty disclaimers
Other Critical Terms:
- Non-compete clauses
- Confidentiality obligations
- Dispute resolution (arbitration, jurisdiction)
- Governing law
- Amendment procedures
-
Flag Concerning Clauses
Red Flags (High Risk):
- Unlimited liability
- Perpetual non-compete
- Automatic renewal without notice
- Unreasonable indemnification
- One-sided termination rights
- Unclear payment terms
- Overly broad IP assignment
- Waiver of legal rights
- Mandatory arbitration (in some contexts)
Yellow Flags (Review Carefully):
- Long non-compete duration
- Broad confidentiality scope
- Short termination notice
- Net 60+ payment terms
- Restrictive exclusivity clauses
- Unilateral amendment rights
-
Compare to Industry Standards
- Note terms that deviate from typical agreements
- Identify unusually favorable or unfavorable terms
- Flag missing standard protections
- Note one-sided provisions
-
Assess Balance
- Is contract heavily favoring one party?
- Are obligations reciprocal?
- Are penalties balanced?
- Are protections mutual?
-
Provide Actionable Recommendations
- Specific clauses to negotiate
- Alternative language suggestions
- Questions to ask the other party
- Terms to add or clarify
- Deal-breakers to consider
Output Format
# Contract Analysis Report
⚠️ **Legal Disclaimer**: This is informational analysis only, not legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for legal matters.
## Contract Overview
- **Type**: [Contract type]
- **Parties**: [Your company] & [Other party]
- **Effective Date**: [Date]
- **Term**: [Duration]
---
## 🚨 Red Flags (Critical Issues)
### 1. Unlimited Personal Liability (Section X)
**Clause**: "[Quote problematic language]"
**Risk**: You could be personally liable for unlimited damages, even beyond insurance coverage.
**Standard Alternative**: Liability should be capped at contract value or insurance limits.
**Recommendation**: Negotiate liability cap of $X or insurance policy limit.
---
## ⚠️ Yellow Flags (Concerning Terms)
### 2. 2-Year Non-Compete (Section Y)
**Clause**: "[Quote]"
**Concern**: Prevents working in your field for 24 months.
**Industry Standard**: 6-12 months is more typical for this role.
**Recommendation**: Negotiate reduction to 6 months and narrower geographic/industry scope.
---
## 💰 Financial Terms
| Term | Details | Assessment |
|------|---------|------------|
| Payment | $X,XXX/month | ✓ Reasonable |
| Payment Schedule | Net 60 | ⚠️ Long (Net 30 preferred) |
| Late Fees | None | ⚠️ Consider adding |
| Rate Increases | Annual 3% | ✓ Good |
---
## 📋 Key Terms Summary
### Intellectual Property
- **Ownership**: [Who owns work product]
- **Assessment**: ⚠️ Clause X assigns all IP, including pre-existing work
- **Recommendation**: Add carve-out for pre-existing IP
### Termination
- **Notice Period**: 30 days
- **Termination for Convenience**: [Yes/No]
- **Assessment**: ✓ Reasonable terms
### Confidentiality
- **Duration**: 3 years post-termination
- **Scope**: [Broad/Narrow]
- **Assessment**: ✓ Standard
### Dispute Resolution
- **Method**: Mandatory arbitration (JAMS rules)
- **Jurisdiction**: [State]
- **Assessment**: ⚠️ Limits court access; may favor large company
---
## ⚖️ Balance Assessment
**Overall Balance**: ⚠️ Somewhat one-sided
**Favors**: [Party name]
**Issues**:
- Termination rights are one-sided (they can terminate for convenience, you cannot)
- Indemnification obligations only apply to you
- They can amend terms with 30 days notice
---
## ✅ Positive Terms
1. Clear payment schedule
2. Reasonable confidentiality duration
3. Insurance requirements are standard
4. IP ownership for pre-existing work protected
---
## 📝 Negotiation Recommendations
### Must Negotiate (Deal Critical)
1. **Liability Cap**: Add cap of $XXX,XXX or insurance limits
2. **Non-Compete**: Reduce to 6 months
### Should Negotiate (High Priority)
3. **Payment Terms**: Request Net 30 instead of Net 60
4. **Mutual Termination**: Add for-convenience termination rights for both parties
### Consider Negotiating (Nice to Have)
5. **Arbitration**: Add option for small claims court
6. **Amendment Rights**: Require mutual consent for material changes
---
## ❓ Questions to Ask
1. "Can we cap liability at the contract value of $X?"
2. "Would you consider reducing the non-compete period to 6 months?"
3. "Can we adjust payment terms to Net 30?"
4. "Is the mandatory arbitration clause negotiable?"
---
## 🚩 Missing Clauses
Standard provisions not included:
- Force majeure clause (pandemic, natural disasters)
- Data protection/GDPR compliance
- Insurance requirements
- Warranty of authority
---
## Overall Recommendation
**Risk Level**: ⚠️ Medium-High
**Action**: Do NOT sign as-is. Negotiate key terms (liability cap, non-compete, payment terms) before signing. Consult attorney for review.
**Deal Assessment**: [Acceptable if concerns addressed / Proceed with caution / Significant concerns]
Examples
User: "Review this freelance contract" Response: Identify contract type (independent contractor) → Extract payment terms, IP ownership, termination → Flag unlimited indemnification clause → Note missing late payment terms → Compare to standard freelance agreements → Recommend specific negotiations
User: "Is this NDA reasonable?" Response: Analyze confidentiality scope (overly broad, includes "residual knowledge") → Check duration (perpetual - concerning) → Review reciprocity (one-way NDA) → Flag concerning terms → Suggest mutual NDA with 3-year term
How to use contract-analyzer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add contract-analyzer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches contract-analyzer from GitHub repository onewave-ai/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate contract-analyzer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /contract-analyzer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★26 reviews- ★★★★★Kofi Lopez· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: contract-analyzer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for contract-analyzer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Arya Desai· Dec 4, 2024
contract-analyzer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Arjun Patel· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for contract-analyzer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: contract-analyzer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend contract-analyzer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Arya Park· Oct 10, 2024
Useful defaults in contract-analyzer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Tariq Bhatia· Oct 10, 2024
contract-analyzer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Zara Diallo· Sep 17, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: contract-analyzer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Zara Huang· Aug 8, 2024
I recommend contract-analyzer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 26