User can provide a what tests or modules to focus on:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontdd:write-testsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tdd:write-tests from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tdd:write-tests. Access via /tdd:write-tests in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
765
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
765
stars
User can provide a what tests or modules to focus on:
$ARGUMENTS
If nothing is provided, focus on all changes in current git diff that not commited. If everything is commited, then will cover latest commit.
After implementing new features or refactoring existing code, it's critical to ensure all business logic changes are covered by tests. This command orchestrates automated test creation for local changes using coverage analysis and specialized agents.
Achieve comprehensive test coverage for all critical business logic in local code changes.
Read sadd skill if available
Discover test infrastructure
Run all tests
Do steps 4-5 in parallel using haiku agents:
Verify single test execution
Analyze local changes
git status -u to identify all changed files (including untracked files)
git show --name-status to get the list of files that were changed in the latest commit.If there is only one changed file, and it's a simple change, then you can write tests yourself. Following this guidline:
Ensure tests are:
If there are multiple changed files, or one file with complex logic, then you need to use specialized agents to cover the changes. Following this guidline:
Launch code-review:test-coverage-reviewer agents (parallel) (Sonnet or Opus models)
Launch developer agents for test file (parallel) (Sonnet or Opus models)
Verify coverage (iteration) (Sonnet or Opus models)
code-review:test-coverage-reviewer agents again per fileIterate if needed
Analyze the file {FILE_PATH} for test coverage needs.
Context: This file was modified in local changes:
{GIT_DIFF_OUTPUT}
Your task:
1. Read the changed file and understand the business logic
2. Identify all critical code paths that need testing:
- New functions/methods added
- Modified business logic
- Edge cases and error handling
- Integration points
3. Review existing tests (if any) to avoid duplication
4. Create a list of test cases needed, prioritized by importance:
- CRITICAL: Core business logic, data mutations
- IMPORTANT: Error handling, validations
- NICE_TO_HAVE: Edge cases, performance
Output format:
- List of test cases with descriptions
- Priority level for each
- Suggested test file location
Create tests for file {FILE_PATH} based on coverage analysis.
Coverage review identified these test cases:
{TEST_CASES_LIST}
Your task:
1. Read TDD skill (if available) for best practices on writing tests
2. Read @README.md for project context and testing conventions
3. Read the target file {FILE_PATH} and understand the logic
4. Review existing test files for patterns and style
5. Create comprehensive tests for all identified cases
6. Run the tests: {TEST_COMMAND}
7. Iterate until all tests pass
8. Ensure tests are:
- Clear and maintainable
- Follow project conventions
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Cover edge cases and error paths
Test command: {TEST_COMMAND}
Verify test coverage for file {FILE_PATH}.
Context: Tests were added to cover local changes in this file.
Your task:
1. Read the changed file {FILE_PATH}
2. Read the new test file(s) created
3. Verify all critical business logic is covered:
- All new functions have tests
- All modified logic has tests
- Edge cases are tested
- Error handling is tested
4. Identify any gaps in coverage
5. Confirm test quality (clear, maintainable, follows TDD principles)
Output:
- PASS: All critical business logic is covered ✅
- GAPS: List specific missing test cases that need to be added
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
cexll/myclaude
github/awesome-copilot
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts
microsoft/playwright-cli
github/awesome-copilot
tdd:write-tests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added tdd:write-tests from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Registry listing for tdd:write-tests matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
tdd:write-tests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for tdd:write-tests matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: tdd:write-tests is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
tdd:write-tests has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
tdd:write-tests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for tdd:write-tests matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
tdd:write-tests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 47