accessibility-testing

aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill accessibility-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Accessibility testing ensures web applications are usable by people with disabilities, including those using screen readers, keyboard navigation, or other assistive technologies. It validates compliance with WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) and identifies barriers to accessibility.

skill.md

Accessibility Testing

Table of Contents

Overview

Accessibility testing ensures web applications are usable by people with disabilities, including those using screen readers, keyboard navigation, or other assistive technologies. It validates compliance with WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) and identifies barriers to accessibility.

When to Use

  • Validating WCAG 2.1/2.2 compliance
  • Testing keyboard navigation
  • Verifying screen reader compatibility
  • Testing color contrast ratios
  • Validating ARIA attributes
  • Testing form accessibility
  • Ensuring focus management
  • Testing with assistive technologies

Quick Start

Minimal working example:

// tests/accessibility/homepage.a11y.test.ts
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
import AxeBuilder from "@axe-core/playwright";

test.describe("Homepage Accessibility", () => {
  test("should not have any automatically detectable WCAG A or AA violations", async ({
    page,
  }) => {
    await page.goto("/");

    const accessibilityScanResults = await new AxeBuilder({ page })
      .withTags(["wcag2a", "wcag2aa", "wcag21a", "wcag21aa"])
      .analyze();

    expect(accessibilityScanResults.violations).toEqual([]);
  });

  test("navigation should be accessible", async ({ page }) => {
    await page.goto("/");

    const results = await new AxeBuilder({ page }).include("nav").analyze();

    expect(results.violations).toEqual([]);
  });

// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)

Reference Guides

Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:

Guide Contents
axe-core with Playwright axe-core with Playwright
Keyboard Navigation Testing Keyboard Navigation Testing
ARIA Testing ARIA Testing
Jest with jest-axe Jest with jest-axe
Cypress Accessibility Testing Cypress Accessibility Testing
Python with Selenium and axe Python with Selenium and axe

Best Practices

✅ DO

  • Test with real assistive technologies
  • Include keyboard-only users
  • Test color contrast
  • Use semantic HTML
  • Provide text alternatives
  • Test with screen readers
  • Run automated tests in CI
  • Follow WCAG 2.1 AA standards

❌ DON'T

  • Rely only on automated tests (they catch ~30-40% of issues)
  • Use color alone to convey information
  • Skip keyboard navigation testing
  • Forget focus management in dynamic content
  • Use div/span for interactive elements
  • Hide focusable content with display:none
  • Ignore ARIA best practices
  • Skip manual testing
how to use accessibility-testing

How to use accessibility-testing on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add accessibility-testing
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill accessibility-testing

The skills CLI fetches accessibility-testing from GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/accessibility-testing

Reload or restart Cursor to activate accessibility-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /accessibility-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.731 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024

    accessibility-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sofia Zhang· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for accessibility-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Evelyn Khan· Dec 20, 2024

    accessibility-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 19, 2024

    I recommend accessibility-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Mei Ghosh· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in accessibility-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Yuki Mehta· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend accessibility-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Pratham Ware· Oct 10, 2024

    Useful defaults in accessibility-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Hana Jain· Oct 6, 2024

    I recommend accessibility-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Noor Smith· Oct 2, 2024

    Useful defaults in accessibility-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Naina Mehta· Sep 25, 2024

    accessibility-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 31

1 / 4