Triages security alerts in Splunk Enterprise Security by classifying severity, investigating notable events, correlating related telemetry, and making escalation or closure decisions using SPL queries and the Incident Review dashboard. Use when SOC analysts face queued alerts from correlation searches, need to prioritize investigation order, or must document triage decisions for handoff to Tier 2/3 analysts.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontriaging-security-alerts-in-splunkExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk. Access via /triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk |
| description | 'Triages security alerts in Splunk Enterprise Security by classifying severity, investigating notable events, correlating related telemetry, and making escalation or closure decisions using SPL queries and the Incident Review dashboard. Use when SOC analysts face queued alerts from correlation searches, need to prioritize investigation order, or must document triage decisions for handoff to Tier 2/3 analysts. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - splunk - alert-triage - siem - notable-events - correlation-search - incident-review |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Use this skill when:
Do not use for deep forensic investigation — escalate to Tier 2/3 after initial triage confirms malicious activity.
ess_analyst capability for notable event status updatesOpen the Incident Review dashboard in Splunk ES. Sort notable events by urgency (calculated from severity x priority). Apply filters to focus on unassigned events:
| `notable`
| search status="new" OR status="unassigned"
| sort - urgency
| table _time, rule_name, src, dest, user, urgency, status
| head 50
Focus on Critical and High urgency events first. Group related alerts by src or dest to identify attack chains rather than treating each alert independently.
For each notable event, pivot to raw events. Example for a brute force alert:
index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" EventCode=4625
src_ip="192.168.1.105"
earliest=-1h latest=now
| stats count by src_ip, dest, user, status
| where count > 10
| sort - count
Check if the source IP is internal (lateral movement) or external (perimeter attack). Cross-reference with asset and identity lookups:
| `notable`
| search rule_name="Brute Force Access Behavior Detected"
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS src OUTPUT category, owner, priority
| lookup identity_lookup_expanded identity AS user OUTPUT department, managedBy
| table _time, src, dest, user, category, owner, department
Check if the same source appears in other telemetry:
index=proxy OR index=firewall src="192.168.1.105" earliest=-24h
| stats count by index, sourcetype, action, dest_port
| sort - count
Look for corroborating evidence: Did the same IP also trigger DNS anomalies, proxy blocks, or endpoint detection alerts?
index=main sourcetype="cisco:asa" src="192.168.1.105" action=blocked earliest=-24h
| timechart span=1h count by dest_port
Query the threat intelligence framework for known IOCs:
| `notable`
| search search_name="Threat - Threat Intelligence Match - Rule"
| lookup threat_intel_by_ip ip AS src OUTPUT threat_collection, threat_description, threat_key
| table _time, src, dest, threat_collection, threat_description, weight
| where weight >= 3
For domains, check against threat lists:
| tstats count from datamodel=Web where Web.url="*evil-domain.com*" by Web.src, Web.url, Web.status
| rename Web.* AS *
Update the notable event status in Incident Review:
| Disposition | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| True Positive | Corroborating evidence confirms malicious activity | Escalate to Tier 2, create incident ticket |
| Benign True Positive | Alert fired correctly but activity is authorized (e.g., pen test) | Close with comment, add suppression if recurring |
| False Positive | Alert logic matched benign behavior | Close, tune correlation search, document pattern |
| Undetermined | Insufficient data to classify | Assign to Tier 2 with investigation notes |
Update via Splunk ES UI or REST API:
| sendalert update_notable_event param.status="2" param.urgency="critical"
param.comment="Confirmed brute force from compromised workstation. Escalated to IR-2024-0431."
param.owner="analyst_jdoe"
Record in the notable event comment field:
| `notable`
| search rule_name="Brute Force*" status="closed"
| stats count by status_label, disposition
| addtotal
Monitor triage performance over time:
| `notable`
| where status_end > 0
| eval triage_time = status_end - _time
| stats avg(triage_time) AS avg_triage_sec, median(triage_time) AS med_triage_sec,
count by rule_name, status_label
| eval avg_triage_min = round(avg_triage_sec/60, 1)
| sort - count
| table rule_name, status_label, count, avg_triage_min
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Notable Event | Splunk ES alert generated by a correlation search that meets defined risk or threshold criteria |
| Urgency | Calculated field combining event severity with asset/identity priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational) |
| Correlation Search | Scheduled SPL query that detects threat patterns and generates notable events when conditions match |
| CIM | Common Information Model — Splunk's normalized field naming convention enabling cross-source queries |
| Disposition | Final classification of an alert: true positive, false positive, benign true positive, or undetermined |
| MTTD/MTTR | Mean Time to Detect / Mean Time to Respond — key SOC metrics measuring detection and resolution speed |
TRIAGE REPORT — Notable Event #NE-2024-08921
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Alert: Brute Force Access Behavior Detected
Time: 2024-03-15 14:23:07 UTC
Source: 192.168.1.105 (WORKSTATION-042, Finance Dept)
Destination: 10.0.5.20 (DC-PRIMARY, Domain Controller)
User: jsmith (Finance Analyst)
Investigation:
- 847 failed logons (4625) in 12 minutes from src
- Successful logon (4624) at 14:35:02 after brute force
- No proxy/DNS anomalies from src in prior 24h
- Source not on threat intel lists
Disposition: TRUE POSITIVE — Compromised credential
Action: Escalated to Tier 2, ticket IR-2024-0431 created
Account jsmith disabled pending password reset
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
I recommend triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 74