Conduct a thick client application penetration test to identify insecure local storage, hardcoded credentials, DLL hijacking, memory manipulation, and insecure API communication in desktop applications using dnSpy, Procmon, and Burp Suite.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-thick-client-application-penetration-testExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test. Access via /performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
2
total installs
2
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
2
installs
2
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test |
| description | Conduct a thick client application penetration test to identify insecure local storage, hardcoded credentials, DLL hijacking, memory manipulation, and insecure API communication in desktop applications using dnSpy, Procmon, and Burp Suite. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | penetration-testing |
| tags | - thick-client - desktop-application - dnSpy - Procmon - DLL-hijacking - binary-analysis - API-interception |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_ai_rmf | - MEASURE-2.7 - MAP-5.1 - MANAGE-2.4 |
| atlas_techniques | - AML.T0070 - AML.T0066 - AML.T0082 |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-06 - GV.OV-02 - DE.AE-07 |
Thick client (fat client) penetration testing assesses the security of desktop applications that run locally on user machines and communicate with backend servers. Unlike web applications, thick clients present a broader attack surface including local file storage, binary analysis, memory manipulation, DLL injection, process interception, and client-server communication. Common targets include banking applications, ERP clients (SAP GUI), trading platforms, healthcare systems, and legacy enterprise software.
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
# Identify application technology
# Check file properties, signatures, framework (.NET, Java, C++, Electron)
file application.exe
# .NET -> dnSpy, JetBrains dotPeek
# Java -> JD-GUI, JADX
# C/C++ -> Ghidra, IDA Pro
# Electron -> extract asar archive
# Check for .NET framework
Get-ChildItem -Path "C:\Program Files\TargetApp" -Recurse -Filter "*.dll" |
ForEach-Object { [System.Reflection.AssemblyName]::GetAssemblyName($_.FullName).FullName }
# Strings analysis
strings application.exe | findstr -i "password\|secret\|api\|key\|token\|jdbc\|connection"
# Check for hardcoded credentials
strings application.exe | findstr -i "username\|user=\|pass=\|pwd=\|admin"
# Review configuration files
type "C:\Program Files\TargetApp\app.config"
type "C:\Program Files\TargetApp\settings.xml"
type "%APPDATA%\TargetApp\config.json"
# Check for certificate pinning
strings application.exe | findstr -i "cert\|pin\|ssl\|tls"
# Open application in dnSpy
1. Launch dnSpy
2. File > Open > Select application.exe and DLLs
3. Search for:
- "password", "secret", "connectionString"
- Authentication methods
- Encryption/decryption functions
- API endpoints and keys
- License validation logic
# Look for:
- Hardcoded credentials in source
- Insecure encryption (DES, MD5, base64 "encryption")
- SQL queries (potential injection)
- Disabled certificate validation
- Debug/verbose logging with sensitive data
# Monitor file system activity with Procmon
# Filters:
# Process Name = application.exe
# Operation = CreateFile, WriteFile, ReadFile, RegSetValue
# Key observations:
# - Where does the app store data? (AppData, temp, registry)
# - Does it write credentials to disk?
# - Does it create temporary files with sensitive data?
# - What registry keys does it access?
# Monitor with Process Hacker
# Check: loaded DLLs, network connections, handles, tokens
# Monitor network traffic
# Wireshark filter: ip.addr == <server_ip>
# Check for: unencrypted credentials, API keys, tokens
# Intercept HTTP/HTTPS traffic with Burp Suite
# Configure system proxy: 127.0.0.1:8080
# Install Burp CA certificate in Windows certificate store
# For non-HTTP protocols, use Echo Mirage
# Inject into process and intercept TCP/UDP traffic
# For HTTPS with certificate pinning:
# Method 1: Patch certificate validation in dnSpy
# Method 2: Use Frida to hook SSL validation
frida -l bypass_ssl_pinning.js -f application.exe
# Fiddler for .NET applications
# Enable HTTPS decryption
# Monitor API calls, request/response bodies
# Test local authentication bypass
1. Open dnSpy, find authentication method
2. Set breakpoint on credential validation
3. Modify return value to bypass (Debug > Set Next Statement)
4. Or: Patch binary to always return true
# Test for credential storage
# Check: registry, config files, SQLite databases, Windows Credential Manager
reg query "HKCU\Software\TargetApp" /s
type "%APPDATA%\TargetApp\user.db"
# SQLite: sqlite3 user.db ".dump"
# Identify DLL search order vulnerability
# Use Procmon to find DLLs loaded from writable paths
# Filter: Result = NAME NOT FOUND, Path ends with .dll
# Create malicious DLL
# msfvenom -p windows/exec CMD=calc.exe -f dll -o hijacked.dll
# Place in application directory or writable PATH directory
# DLL sideloading
# If app loads DLL without full path:
# 1. Create DLL with same exports
# 2. Place in app directory
# 3. DLL loads before legitimate version
# Dump process memory
# Use Process Hacker > Process > Properties > Memory
# Search for plaintext credentials, tokens, session IDs
# Strings from memory dump
strings process_dump.dmp | findstr -i "password\|token\|session\|bearer"
# Modify memory values (license bypass, privilege escalation)
# Use Cheat Engine or x64dbg to:
# 1. Find memory address of authorization variable
# 2. Modify value (e.g., isAdmin = 0 -> isAdmin = 1)
# SQL Injection in local database
# Test input fields with: ' OR 1=1--
# If app uses local SQLite/SQL Server Express
# Command injection
# Test fields that interact with OS:
# File paths: ..\..\..\..\windows\system32\cmd.exe
# Print/export: | calc.exe
# Buffer overflow
# Send oversized input to text fields
# Monitor with x64dbg for crashes
# Check for SEH-based or stack-based overflows
# Capture API calls from thick client
# In Burp Suite, analyze:
# IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference)
# Change user IDs in requests to access other users' data
# GET /api/users/1001 -> GET /api/users/1002
# Authorization bypass
# Remove or modify JWT tokens
# Test role escalation: change role claim from "user" to "admin"
# Mass assignment
# Add additional parameters to API requests
# POST /api/profile {"name": "test", "isAdmin": true}
# Rate limiting
# Test for brute-force protection on login API
# Test for account lockout bypass
| Finding | Severity | CVSS | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardcoded database credentials in binary | Critical | 9.1 | Use secure credential storage (DPAPI, vault) |
| DLL hijacking via writable app directory | High | 7.8 | Use full DLL paths, validate DLL signatures |
| Plaintext credentials in memory | High | 7.5 | Zero memory after use, use SecureString |
| No certificate pinning | Medium | 6.5 | Implement certificate pinning |
| Local SQLite DB with cleartext passwords | Critical | 9.0 | Use bcrypt/Argon2 hashing |
| Disabled SSL validation in code | High | 8.1 | Enable proper certificate validation |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 27