Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization bypass.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontesting-mobile-api-authenticationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches testing-mobile-api-authentication from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate testing-mobile-api-authentication. Access via /testing-mobile-api-authentication in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | testing-mobile-api-authentication |
| description | 'Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization bypass. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | mobile-security |
| author | mahipal |
| tags | - mobile-security - android - ios - api-security - authentication - penetration-testing |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - PR.AA-05 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-09 |
Use this skill when:
Do not use this skill against production APIs without explicit authorization and rate-limiting awareness.
Intercept mobile app traffic to identify authentication-related endpoints:
POST /api/v1/auth/login - Initial authentication
POST /api/v1/auth/register - Account registration
POST /api/v1/auth/refresh - Token refresh
POST /api/v1/auth/logout - Session termination
POST /api/v1/auth/forgot-password - Password reset
POST /api/v1/auth/verify-otp - OTP verification
GET /api/v1/auth/me - Authenticated user profile
JWT Analysis:
# Decode JWT without verification
echo "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs..." | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null
# Check for common JWT vulnerabilities:
# 1. None algorithm attack
# Change header to: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Remove signature: header.payload.
# 2. Algorithm confusion (RS256 to HS256)
# If server uses RS256, try HS256 with public key as secret
# 3. Weak signing key
# Use hashcat or jwt-cracker to brute-force HMAC secret
hashcat -m 16500 jwt.txt wordlist.txt
# 4. Expiration bypass
# Modify "exp" claim to future timestamp
Opaque Token Analysis:
- Test token length and entropy
- Check if tokens are sequential/predictable
- Test token reuse after logout
- Verify token invalidation on password change
# Test missing authentication
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile
# Test with empty/null token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer "
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer null"
# Test with expired token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <expired_token>"
# Test token from different user
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/profile \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"
# Change user ID in request path
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/123/orders \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>"
# Change object ID in request body
curl -X PUT https://api.target.com/api/v1/orders/789 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <user_456_token>" \
-d '{"status": "cancelled"}'
# Test horizontal privilege escalation
# Access admin endpoints with regular user token
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/admin/users \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <regular_user_token>"
# Test concurrent sessions
# Login from multiple devices simultaneously - should both remain valid?
# Test session invalidation after logout
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/login \
-d '{"email":"[email protected]","password":"pass"}' | jq -r '.token')
# Logout
curl -X POST https://api.target.com/api/v1/auth/logout \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Try using the same token (should fail)
curl -X GET https://api.target.com/api/v1/users/me \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Test session invalidation after password change
# Token obtained before password change should be invalidated
# Test for authorization code interception
# Check if PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) is enforced
# Test with missing code_verifier parameter
# Test redirect URI manipulation
# Try custom scheme hijacking: myapp://callback
# Test with modified redirect_uri parameter
# Test scope escalation
# Request higher privileges than granted
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| BOLA/IDOR | Broken Object Level Authorization - accessing resources by changing identifiers without server-side authorization checks |
| JWT | JSON Web Token - self-contained authentication token with header, payload, and signature components |
| PKCE | Proof Key for Code Exchange - OAuth 2.0 extension preventing authorization code interception in mobile apps |
| Token Refresh | Mechanism for obtaining new access tokens using long-lived refresh tokens without re-authentication |
| Session Fixation | Attack where adversary sets a known session ID before victim authenticates, then hijacks the session |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-mobile-api-authentication is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend testing-mobile-api-authentication for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: testing-mobile-api-authentication is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
testing-mobile-api-authentication is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
testing-mobile-api-authentication fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend testing-mobile-api-authentication for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-mobile-api-authentication is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
testing-mobile-api-authentication reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
testing-mobile-api-authentication has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Registry listing for testing-mobile-api-authentication matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 27