Conduct a sector-specific threat landscape assessment by analyzing threat actor targeting patterns, common attack vectors, and industry-specific vulnerabilities to inform organizational risk management.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sectorExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector. Access via /performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector |
| description | Conduct a sector-specific threat landscape assessment by analyzing threat actor targeting patterns, common attack vectors, and industry-specific vulnerabilities to inform organizational risk management. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | threat-intelligence |
| tags | - threat-landscape - sector-analysis - risk-assessment - threat-intelligence - industry-targeting - cti - strategic-intelligence |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Application Protocol Command Analysis - Identifier Analysis - Content Format Conversion - Message Analysis |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-05 - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 |
A sector-specific threat landscape assessment analyzes the cyber threat environment facing a particular industry vertical (healthcare, financial services, energy, government, manufacturing) by examining which threat actors target the sector, their preferred attack vectors and TTPs, common vulnerabilities exploited, historical incident data, and emerging threats. This produces actionable intelligence for risk management, security investment prioritization, and board-level reporting.
attackcti, requests, pandas, matplotlib librariesDifferent sectors face different threat profiles. Financial services face sophisticated nation-state actors (Lazarus Group) and cybercriminal groups focused on financial fraud. Healthcare faces ransomware groups exploiting urgency and legacy systems. Energy and critical infrastructure face nation-state groups (TEMP.Veles, Sandworm) with destructive capabilities. Government faces espionage-focused APTs (APT29, APT28, Turla).
A comprehensive assessment includes: threat actor profiling (groups targeting the sector), attack vector analysis (initial access methods observed), TTP mapping (techniques commonly used against sector), vulnerability landscape (CVEs commonly exploited), incident trend analysis (breach frequency, impact, recovery time), and emerging threats (new groups, evolving techniques, supply chain risks).
Sector-specific intelligence comes from ISACs (Information Sharing and Analysis Centers), government advisories (CISA, FBI, NSA), vendor threat reports (CrowdStrike Annual Threat Report, Mandiant M-Trends, Verizon DBIR), and academic research on sector-specific attacks.
from attackcti import attack_client
import json
class SectorThreatAssessment:
SECTOR_GROUPS = {
"financial": ["FIN7", "FIN8", "FIN11", "Carbanak", "Lazarus Group",
"Cobalt Group", "TA505", "GOLD SOUTHFIELD"],
"healthcare": ["FIN12", "Ryuk", "Conti", "Wizard Spider",
"GOLD ULRICK", "Vice Society"],
"energy": ["TEMP.Veles", "Sandworm Team", "Dragonfly",
"XENOTIME", "ERYTHRITE", "Berserk Bear"],
"government": ["APT29", "APT28", "Turla", "Gamaredon Group",
"Mustang Panda", "APT41", "Lazarus Group"],
"manufacturing": ["APT41", "TEMP.Veles", "Dragonfly",
"HEXANE", "MAGNALLIUM"],
"technology": ["APT41", "Lazarus Group", "APT10",
"HAFNIUM", "Winnti Group"],
}
def __init__(self, sector):
self.sector = sector.lower()
self.lift = attack_client()
self.groups = self.lift.get_groups()
self.assessment = {
"sector": sector,
"threat_actors": [],
"common_techniques": {},
"attack_vectors": {},
"risk_summary": {},
}
def analyze_sector_actors(self):
"""Analyze threat actors known to target this sector."""
target_groups = self.SECTOR_GROUPS.get(self.sector, [])
actor_profiles = []
for group_name in target_groups:
group = next(
(g for g in self.groups
if g.get("name", "").lower() == group_name.lower()
or group_name.lower() in [a.lower() for a in g.get("aliases", [])]),
None
)
if group:
group_id = ""
for ref in group.get("external_references", []):
if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
group_id = ref.get("external_id", "")
break
techniques = []
if group_id:
techs = self.lift.get_techniques_used_by_group(group_id)
for t in techs:
for ref in t.get("external_references", []):
if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
techniques.append({
"id": ref.get("external_id", ""),
"name": t.get("name", ""),
})
break
profile = {
"name": group.get("name", ""),
"aliases": group.get("aliases", []),
"description": group.get("description", "")[:300],
"attack_id": group_id,
"technique_count": len(techniques),
"techniques": techniques[:20],
}
actor_profiles.append(profile)
print(f" [+] {group.get('name')}: {len(techniques)} techniques")
self.assessment["threat_actors"] = actor_profiles
print(f"[+] Profiled {len(actor_profiles)} threat actors for {self.sector}")
return actor_profiles
def identify_common_techniques(self):
"""Find the most commonly used techniques across sector actors."""
from collections import Counter
technique_counter = Counter()
for actor in self.assessment["threat_actors"]:
for tech in actor.get("techniques", []):
technique_counter[f"{tech['id']}:{tech['name']}"] += 1
common = technique_counter.most_common(20)
self.assessment["common_techniques"] = [
{
"technique": tech.split(":")[0],
"name": tech.split(":")[1] if ":" in tech else "",
"actor_count": count,
"actors_using": [
a["name"] for a in self.assessment["threat_actors"]
if any(t["id"] == tech.split(":")[0] for t in a.get("techniques", []))
],
}
for tech, count in common
]
print(f"\n=== Top Techniques for {self.sector.upper()} ===")
for entry in self.assessment["common_techniques"][:10]:
print(f" {entry['technique']} {entry['name']}: "
f"used by {entry['actor_count']} groups")
return self.assessment["common_techniques"]
assessment = SectorThreatAssessment("financial")
assessment.analyze_sector_actors()
assessment.identify_common_techniques()
def analyze_attack_vectors(assessment):
"""Analyze initial access vectors common for the sector."""
initial_access_techniques = [
t for t in assessment.assessment["common_techniques"]
if t["technique"].startswith("T1566") or t["technique"].startswith("T1190")
or t["technique"].startswith("T1133") or t["technique"].startswith("T1078")
or t["technique"].startswith("T1195")
]
# Supplement with known sector-specific vectors
sector_vectors = {
"financial": {
"primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)",
"Valid Accounts (T1078)", "Supply Chain Compromise (T1195)"],
"emerging": ["MFA Fatigue/Push Bombing", "QR Code Phishing (Quishing)",
"Business Email Compromise", "API Key Theft"],
},
"healthcare": {
"primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)",
"External Remote Services (T1133)", "Valid Accounts (T1078)"],
"emerging": ["IoMT Device Exploitation", "Telehealth Platform Attacks",
"Medical Device Firmware Attacks", "Supply Chain via EHR Vendors"],
},
"energy": {
"primary": ["Spearphishing (T1566)", "Exploit Public-Facing App (T1190)",
"External Remote Services (T1133)", "Supply Chain Compromise (T1195)"],
"emerging": ["OT/ICS Protocol Exploitation", "Remote Access to SCADA",
"Engineering Workstation Compromise", "Vendor VPN Exploitation"],
},
}
vectors = sector_vectors.get(assessment.sector, {})
assessment.assessment["attack_vectors"] = vectors
return vectors
def generate_sector_report(assessment):
data = assessment.assessment
report = f"""# {data['sector'].title()} Sector Threat Landscape Assessment
Generated: {datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()}
## Executive Summary
This assessment analyzes the cyber threat landscape for the {data['sector']} sector,
identifying {len(data['threat_actors'])} active threat groups, their preferred techniques,
and recommended defensive priorities.
## Threat Actor Summary
| Actor | ATT&CK ID | Techniques | Key Focus |
|-------|-----------|------------|-----------|
"""
for actor in data["threat_actors"]:
report += (f"| {actor['name']} | {actor['attack_id']} "
f"| {actor['technique_count']} | {actor['description'][:60]}... |\n")
report += f"""
## Most Common Techniques
| Rank | Technique | Name | Groups Using |
|------|-----------|------|-------------|
"""
for i, tech in enumerate(data.get("common_techniques", [])[:15], 1):
actors = ", ".join(tech["actors_using"][:3])
report += f"| {i} | {tech['technique']} | {tech['name']} | {actors} |\n"
vectors = data.get("attack_vectors", {})
report += f"""
## Attack Vectors
### Primary Vectors
"""
for v in vectors.get("primary", []):
report += f"- {v}\n"
report += "\n### Emerging Vectors\n"
for v in vectors.get("emerging", []):
report += f"- {v}\n"
report += """
## Recommendations
1. Prioritize detections for the top 10 techniques used by sector-targeting groups
2. Conduct threat-informed red team exercises mimicking identified actors
3. Join sector ISAC for real-time threat sharing
4. Implement controls for identified initial access vectors
5. Review supply chain security posture for sector-specific risks
"""
with open(f"threat_landscape_{data['sector']}.md", "w") as f:
f.write(report)
print(f"[+] Sector report saved: threat_landscape_{data['sector']}.md")
generate_sector_report(assessment)
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
We added performing-threat-landscape-assessment-for-sector from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 28