Executes a structured ransomware incident response from initial detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening. Addresses ransom negotiation considerations, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification requirements. Activates for requests involving ransomware response, ransomware recovery, crypto-ransomware, data encryption attack, ransom payment decision, or ransomware containment.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-ransomware-responseExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-ransomware-response from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-ransomware-response. Access via /performing-ransomware-response in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-ransomware-response |
| description | 'Executes a structured ransomware incident response from initial detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening. Addresses ransom negotiation considerations, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification requirements. Activates for requests involving ransomware response, ransomware recovery, crypto-ransomware, data encryption attack, ransom payment decision, or ransomware containment. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - ransomware - encryption-recovery - backup-restoration - ransom-negotiation - CISA-guidance |
| mitre_attack | - T1486 - T1490 - T1489 - T1021 - T1570 |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Do not use for general malware incidents that do not involve file encryption or extortion; use malware incident response procedures instead.
Validate that the incident is ransomware and determine the variant:
Ransomware Identification:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Variant: LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Extension: .lockbit3
Ransom Note: README-LOCKBIT.txt
Tor Site: lockbit[redacted].onion
Deployment: Group Policy Object pushing ransomware.exe to all domain-joined systems
Initial Access: VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time: 12 days
Data Exfiltration: Yes - 47GB uploaded to MEGA via rclone prior to encryption
Stop ransomware propagation before assessing damage:
Quantify the impact to inform recovery and business decisions:
Impact Assessment:
Encrypted Systems: 187 of 340 endpoints (55%)
Encrypted Servers: 12 of 28 (43%) - includes 2 file servers, 1 database server
Domain Controllers: 2 of 3 encrypted
Backup Status: Veeam repository intact (offline copy verified clean)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed - 47GB to MEGA (file listing under analysis)
Ransom Demand: $2.5M in Bitcoin (72-hour deadline)
OFAC Screening: LockBit - not currently sanctioned entity (verify with counsel)
Evaluate recovery options in consultation with legal, executive leadership, and cyber insurance:
| Option | Pros | Cons | Recommended When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restore from backup | No payment, no legal risk | Recovery time may be days | Clean backups available |
| Free decryptor | No payment, fast | Rare availability | Variant has published decryptor |
| Negotiate and pay | Potentially faster | No guarantee, legal risk, funds threat actors | No backups, business survival at stake |
| Rebuild from scratch | Clean environment | Longest timeline, data loss | Backups compromised, willing to accept data loss |
Implement the chosen recovery strategy:
If restoring from backup:
If using a decryptor:
Implement controls to prevent recurrence:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Double Extortion | Ransomware tactic combining file encryption with data exfiltration and threat to publish stolen data |
| Immutable Backup | Backup storage that cannot be modified or deleted for a defined retention period, protecting against ransomware targeting backups |
| OFAC Sanctions | U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control restrictions that may prohibit ransom payments to sanctioned entities or jurisdictions |
| Dwell Time | Days the attacker was present before deploying ransomware; critical for determining which backups are clean |
| Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) | Criminal business model where ransomware developers lease their malware to affiliates who conduct attacks |
| Rclone | Legitimate cloud sync tool commonly abused by ransomware operators for data exfiltration before encryption |
| 3-2-1-1-0 Backup Rule | Backup strategy requiring 3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable/air-gapped, and 0 errors in recovery testing |
Context: Attackers compromised VPN credentials (no MFA), spent 12 days performing reconnaissance, disabled antivirus via GPO, exfiltrated 47GB of data, and deployed LockBit 3.0 across the domain via GPO at 2:00 AM on a Sunday.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
RANSOMWARE INCIDENT REPORT
===========================
Incident: INC-2025-1892
Ransomware Family: LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Date Detected: 2025-11-17T06:45:00Z
Initial Access: VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time: 12 days
IMPACT SUMMARY
Encrypted Systems: 187 endpoints, 12 servers
Business Impact: Full operations disruption
Data Exfiltrated: 47GB (finance, HR, legal documents)
Ransom Demand: $2.5M BTC (72-hour deadline)
Backup Status: Veeam immutable repository - CLEAN
RECOVERY APPROACH
Decision: Restore from backup (no ransom payment)
Recovery Start: 2025-11-17T10:00:00Z
DC Rebuild: Complete - 2025-11-17T18:00:00Z
Critical Systems: Restored - 2025-11-18T12:00:00Z
Full Recovery: Estimated 2025-11-21
CONTAINMENT TIMELINE
06:45 UTC - Ransomware detected by SOC analyst
07:00 UTC - Network segments disconnected
07:15 UTC - Incident commander activated IR plan
07:30 UTC - Backup integrity verification started
08:00 UTC - Memory forensics initiated on 2 live systems
10:00 UTC - Recovery operations commenced in clean room
POST-INCIDENT ACTIONS
1. MFA enforced on all VPN and remote access
2. 3-2-1-1-0 backup architecture implemented
3. Network segmentation between workstation/server VLANs
4. LAPS deployed for local administrator passwords
5. Regulatory notifications filed (GDPR 72-hour, state AG)
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
We added performing-ransomware-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performing-ransomware-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in performing-ransomware-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
performing-ransomware-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
performing-ransomware-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
We added performing-ransomware-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ransomware-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in performing-ransomware-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
performing-ransomware-response is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
performing-ransomware-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 69