performing-ransomware-response▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Executes a structured ransomware incident response from initial detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening. Addresses ransom negotiation considerations, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification requirements. Activates for requests involving ransomware response, ransomware recovery, crypto-ransomware, data encryption attack, ransom payment decision, or ransomware containment.
| name | performing-ransomware-response |
| description | 'Executes a structured ransomware incident response from initial detection through containment, forensic analysis, decryption assessment, recovery, and post-incident hardening. Addresses ransom negotiation considerations, backup integrity verification, and regulatory notification requirements. Activates for requests involving ransomware response, ransomware recovery, crypto-ransomware, data encryption attack, ransom payment decision, or ransomware containment. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - ransomware - encryption-recovery - backup-restoration - ransom-negotiation - CISA-guidance |
| mitre_attack | - T1486 - T1490 - T1489 - T1021 - T1570 |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Performing Ransomware Response
When to Use
- Ransomware has been detected executing or file encryption is actively occurring
- Users report inability to open files with unfamiliar extensions appended
- A ransom note is discovered on one or more systems
- EDR detects mass file modification patterns consistent with encryption behavior
- Threat intelligence warns of an imminent ransomware campaign targeting the organization
Do not use for general malware incidents that do not involve file encryption or extortion; use malware incident response procedures instead.
Prerequisites
- Ransomware-specific incident response playbook reviewed and approved by executive leadership
- Tested and verified offline backup strategy with air-gapped or immutable copies
- Incident retainer with a specialized ransomware response firm (e.g., Mandiant, CrowdStrike Services, Kroll)
- Legal counsel pre-engaged for OFAC sanctions screening and regulatory notification
- Cyber insurance carrier contact information and policy coverage details
- Bitcoin/cryptocurrency analysis capability or third-party engagement for payment tracing
Workflow
Step 1: Detect and Confirm Ransomware
Validate that the incident is ransomware and determine the variant:
- Identify the ransomware by analyzing the ransom note filename, extension appended to encrypted files, and note content
- Upload the ransom note and a sample encrypted file to ID Ransomware (id-ransomware.malwarehunterteam.com)
- Check NoMoreRansom.org for available free decryptors
- Determine the ransomware deployment method from EDR/SIEM logs
- Identify the ransomware group (e.g., LockBit, BlackCat/ALPHV, Royal, Akira, Play)
Ransomware Identification:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Variant: LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Extension: .lockbit3
Ransom Note: README-LOCKBIT.txt
Tor Site: lockbit[redacted].onion
Deployment: Group Policy Object pushing ransomware.exe to all domain-joined systems
Initial Access: VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time: 12 days
Data Exfiltration: Yes - 47GB uploaded to MEGA via rclone prior to encryption
Step 2: Immediate Containment
Stop ransomware propagation before assessing damage:
- Priority 1: Disconnect affected network segments from core infrastructure (pull the network cable, not shutdown)
- Priority 2: Isolate all domain controllers immediately if GPO-based deployment is suspected
- Priority 3: Disable the compromised accounts used for deployment
- Priority 4: Block lateral movement protocols (SMB TCP/445, RDP TCP/3389, WinRM TCP/5985-5986)
- Priority 5: Preserve at least one encrypted system live (do not power off) for memory forensics
- Do NOT: Shut down encrypted systems; keep them powered on to preserve encryption keys in memory
Step 3: Assess Damage and Scope
Quantify the impact to inform recovery and business decisions:
- Count the number of encrypted systems (workstations, servers, domain controllers)
- Determine which business-critical systems and data are affected
- Verify backup integrity: check that backups were not encrypted, deleted, or corrupted
- Assess whether data exfiltration occurred (check for rclone, WinSCP, MEGA, cloud storage activity)
- Determine the ransom demand amount and payment deadline
- Check OFAC sanctions lists to verify the ransomware group is not a sanctioned entity (paying is legally risky)
Impact Assessment:
Encrypted Systems: 187 of 340 endpoints (55%)
Encrypted Servers: 12 of 28 (43%) - includes 2 file servers, 1 database server
Domain Controllers: 2 of 3 encrypted
Backup Status: Veeam repository intact (offline copy verified clean)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed - 47GB to MEGA (file listing under analysis)
Ransom Demand: $2.5M in Bitcoin (72-hour deadline)
OFAC Screening: LockBit - not currently sanctioned entity (verify with counsel)
Step 4: Recovery Decision Matrix
Evaluate recovery options in consultation with legal, executive leadership, and cyber insurance:
| Option | Pros | Cons | Recommended When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restore from backup | No payment, no legal risk | Recovery time may be days | Clean backups available |
| Free decryptor | No payment, fast | Rare availability | Variant has published decryptor |
| Negotiate and pay | Potentially faster | No guarantee, legal risk, funds threat actors | No backups, business survival at stake |
| Rebuild from scratch | Clean environment | Longest timeline, data loss | Backups compromised, willing to accept data loss |
Step 5: Execute Recovery
Implement the chosen recovery strategy:
If restoring from backup:
- Build a clean isolated network segment for recovery operations
- Rebuild domain controllers first from clean media (do NOT restore DC backups older than the dwell time)
- Reset ALL user and service account passwords before joining any system to the new domain
- Restore servers in priority order: authentication, DNS, DHCP, then business-critical applications
- Restore workstations via reimaging, not file-level restore
- Restore data from verified clean backups to rebuilt file servers
- Reconnect to production network only after validation
If using a decryptor:
- Test the decryptor on a non-critical system first
- Decrypt in order of business priority
- Scan all decrypted systems for residual malware before reconnection
Step 6: Post-Ransomware Hardening
Implement controls to prevent recurrence:
- Enforce MFA on all remote access (VPN, RDP, cloud portals)
- Implement 3-2-1-1-0 backup strategy (3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable, 0 errors)
- Deploy application whitelisting on servers
- Implement network segmentation between workstation and server VLANs
- Enable Protected Users security group for privileged accounts
- Disable NTLM authentication where possible
- Deploy LAPS (Local Administrator Password Solution) for local admin accounts
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Double Extortion | Ransomware tactic combining file encryption with data exfiltration and threat to publish stolen data |
| Immutable Backup | Backup storage that cannot be modified or deleted for a defined retention period, protecting against ransomware targeting backups |
| OFAC Sanctions | U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control restrictions that may prohibit ransom payments to sanctioned entities or jurisdictions |
| Dwell Time | Days the attacker was present before deploying ransomware; critical for determining which backups are clean |
| Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) | Criminal business model where ransomware developers lease their malware to affiliates who conduct attacks |
| Rclone | Legitimate cloud sync tool commonly abused by ransomware operators for data exfiltration before encryption |
| 3-2-1-1-0 Backup Rule | Backup strategy requiring 3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite, 1 immutable/air-gapped, and 0 errors in recovery testing |
Tools & Systems
- ID Ransomware: Online service to identify ransomware variant from ransom note or encrypted file sample
- NoMoreRansom.org: Europol-backed project providing free decryption tools for certain ransomware families
- Veeam / Commvault: Enterprise backup platforms with immutable repository and instant VM recovery capabilities
- KAPE: Rapid forensic triage collection from encrypted systems to determine initial access and dwell time
- Cado Response: Cloud-native forensics platform for investigating ransomware that affects cloud infrastructure
Common Scenarios
Scenario: LockBit 3.0 via Compromised VPN
Context: Attackers compromised VPN credentials (no MFA), spent 12 days performing reconnaissance, disabled antivirus via GPO, exfiltrated 47GB of data, and deployed LockBit 3.0 across the domain via GPO at 2:00 AM on a Sunday.
Approach:
- Disconnect all network segments at the core switch level
- Verify offline backup integrity (Veeam repository on immutable storage)
- Preserve two encrypted servers powered on for memory forensics
- Engage incident response retainer and cyber insurance carrier
- Begin recovery in isolated network: rebuild DCs, reset all passwords, restore in priority order
- Conduct forensic investigation in parallel to determine initial access and full adversary activity
Pitfalls:
- Restoring from backups that were created during the 12-day dwell time (may contain backdoors)
- Paying the ransom without OFAC screening and legal counsel review
- Reconnecting recovered systems to the production network before full password reset
- Not checking for data exfiltration, leaving the organization exposed to the extortion threat
Output Format
RANSOMWARE INCIDENT REPORT
===========================
Incident: INC-2025-1892
Ransomware Family: LockBit 3.0 (Black)
Date Detected: 2025-11-17T06:45:00Z
Initial Access: VPN credential compromise (no MFA)
Dwell Time: 12 days
IMPACT SUMMARY
Encrypted Systems: 187 endpoints, 12 servers
Business Impact: Full operations disruption
Data Exfiltrated: 47GB (finance, HR, legal documents)
Ransom Demand: $2.5M BTC (72-hour deadline)
Backup Status: Veeam immutable repository - CLEAN
RECOVERY APPROACH
Decision: Restore from backup (no ransom payment)
Recovery Start: 2025-11-17T10:00:00Z
DC Rebuild: Complete - 2025-11-17T18:00:00Z
Critical Systems: Restored - 2025-11-18T12:00:00Z
Full Recovery: Estimated 2025-11-21
CONTAINMENT TIMELINE
06:45 UTC - Ransomware detected by SOC analyst
07:00 UTC - Network segments disconnected
07:15 UTC - Incident commander activated IR plan
07:30 UTC - Backup integrity verification started
08:00 UTC - Memory forensics initiated on 2 live systems
10:00 UTC - Recovery operations commenced in clean room
POST-INCIDENT ACTIONS
1. MFA enforced on all VPN and remote access
2. 3-2-1-1-0 backup architecture implemented
3. Network segmentation between workstation/server VLANs
4. LAPS deployed for local administrator passwords
5. Regulatory notifications filed (GDPR 72-hour, state AG)
How to use performing-ransomware-response on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-ransomware-response
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-ransomware-response from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-ransomware-response. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-ransomware-response) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★69 reviews- ★★★★★Ren Abebe· Dec 28, 2024
We added performing-ransomware-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Olivia Desai· Dec 28, 2024
performing-ransomware-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Camila Shah· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-ransomware-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Fatima Sethi· Dec 20, 2024
performing-ransomware-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024
performing-ransomware-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Olivia Harris· Dec 16, 2024
We added performing-ransomware-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Lopez· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ransomware-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Mia Harris· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-ransomware-response — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dev Nasser· Nov 19, 2024
performing-ransomware-response is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Dev Khan· Nov 15, 2024
performing-ransomware-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 69