performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty

This skill covers performing vulnerability assessments in OT environments using the Claroty xDome platform for comprehensive asset discovery, risk scoring, vulnerability correlation, and remediation prioritization. It addresses passive vulnerability identification through traffic analysis, active safe querying of OT devices, integration with CVE databases and ICS-CERT advisories, and risk-based prioritization that accounts for operational impact and compensating controls.

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

8.6K

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty

0

installs

0

this week

8.6K

stars

Installation Guide

How to use performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty

Fetches performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty

Restart Cursor to activate performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty. Access via /performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

name
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty
description
'This skill covers performing vulnerability assessments in OT environments using the Claroty xDome platform for comprehensive asset discovery, risk scoring, vulnerability correlation, and remediation prioritization. It addresses passive vulnerability identification through traffic analysis, active safe querying of OT devices, integration with CVE databases and ICS-CERT advisories, and risk-based prioritization that accounts for operational impact and compensating controls. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
ot-ics-security
tags
- ot-security - ics - scada - industrial-control - iec62443 - vulnerability-assessment - claroty
version
1.0.0
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
nist_csf
- PR.IR-01 - DE.CM-01 - ID.AM-05 - GV.OC-02

Performing OT Vulnerability Assessment with Claroty

When to Use

  • When conducting scheduled OT vulnerability assessments per IEC 62443 or NERC CIP requirements
  • When deploying Claroty xDome for the first time and performing initial asset discovery and risk assessment
  • When correlating newly published ICS-CERT advisories against your OT asset inventory
  • When prioritizing OT vulnerability remediation with limited maintenance windows
  • When generating compliance evidence for CIP-010-4 vulnerability assessment requirements

Do not use for active vulnerability scanning of PLCs and safety systems (see performing-ot-network-security-assessment for passive approaches), for IT-only vulnerability management (see standard vulnerability scanners), or for penetration testing (see performing-ics-penetration-testing).

Prerequisites

  • Claroty xDome or CTD (Continuous Threat Detection) deployed with sensors on OT network
  • Network SPAN/TAP access for passive asset discovery
  • CISA ICS-CERT advisory subscription for vulnerability tracking
  • Asset inventory with firmware versions for all OT devices
  • Change management process for patch deployment during maintenance windows

Workflow

Step 1: Configure Asset Discovery and Vulnerability Correlation

Configure Claroty to perform passive and active-safe discovery to build complete asset inventory with firmware versions for vulnerability correlation.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""OT Vulnerability Assessment Manager.

Correlates OT asset inventory with ICS-CERT advisories and CVE data
to identify, prioritize, and track OT vulnerabilities. Designed to
integrate with Claroty xDome API or standalone operation.
"""

import json
import sys
from collections import defaultdict
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, asdict
from datetime import datetime

import requests


@dataclass
class OTAsset:
    asset_id: str
    name: str
    vendor: str
    model: str
    firmware_version: str
    asset_type: str  # PLC, HMI, RTU, historian, switch, etc.
    purdue_level: str
    ip_address: str
    protocol: str
    criticality: str  # critical, high, medium, low
    zone: str


@dataclass
class OTVulnerability:
    vuln_id: str
    cve_id: str
    title: str
    severity: str  # critical, high, medium, low
    cvss_score: float
    affected_vendor: str
    affected_product: str
    affected_versions: str
    description: str
    ics_cert_advisory: str = ""
    remediation: str = ""
    patch_available: bool = False
    compensating_controls: str = ""


@dataclass
class RiskAssessment:
    asset: OTAsset
    vulnerability: OTVulnerability
    risk_score: float = 0.0
    risk_rating: str = ""
    exploitability: str = ""
    operational_impact: str = ""
    compensating_controls: list = field(default_factory=list)
    remediation_priority: int = 0


class OTVulnerabilityAssessment:
    """OT vulnerability assessment and prioritization engine."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.assets = []
        self.vulnerabilities = []
        self.risk_assessments = []

    def load_assets(self, assets_data):
        """Load asset inventory from Claroty export or manual inventory."""
        for a in assets_data:
            self.assets.append(OTAsset(**a))
        print(f"[*] Loaded {len(self.assets)} OT assets")

    def fetch_ics_advisories(self):
        """Fetch latest ICS-CERT advisories from CISA."""
        print("[*] Fetching ICS-CERT advisories from CISA...")
        try:
            # CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
            url = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
            resp = requests.get(url, timeout=30)
            resp.raise_for_status()
            data = resp.json()

            ics_vulns = []
            for vuln in data.get("vulnerabilities", []):
                # Filter for ICS-relevant vendors
                ics_vendors = [
                    "siemens", "schneider", "rockwell", "honeywell",
                    "abb", "ge", "emerson", "yokogawa", "omron",
                    "mitsubishi", "phoenix", "moxa", "advantech",
                ]
                vendor = vuln.get("vendorProject", "").lower()
                if any(v in vendor for v in ics_vendors):
                    ics_vulns.append(vuln)

            print(f"  Found {len(ics_vulns)} ICS-relevant known exploited vulnerabilities")
            return ics_vulns

        except Exception as e:
            print(f"[WARN] Could not fetch advisories: {e}")
            return []

    def correlate_vulnerabilities(self):
        """Match vulnerabilities to assets based on vendor/model/firmware."""
        print("[*] Correlating vulnerabilities to assets...")

        for asset in self.assets:
            for vuln in self.vulnerabilities:
                if (vuln.affected_vendor.lower() in asset.vendor.lower() and
                    vuln.affected_product.lower() in asset.model.lower()):
                    # Check firmware version if specified
                    ra = RiskAssessment(asset=asset, vulnerability=vuln)
                    self._calculate_risk_score(ra)
                    self.risk_assessments.append(ra)

        print(f"  Correlated {len(self.risk_assessments)} asset-vulnerability pairs")

    def _calculate_risk_score(self, ra):
        """Calculate OT-specific risk score considering operational impact."""
        # Base score from CVSS
        base = ra.vulnerability.cvss_score

        # Criticality multiplier based on asset function
        criticality_weights = {
            "critical": 1.5,  # SIS, safety systems
            "high": 1.3,      # PLCs, primary control
            "medium": 1.0,    # HMIs, historians
            "low": 0.7,       # non-critical support systems
        }
        criticality = criticality_weights.get(ra.asset.criticality, 1.0)

        # Purdue level proximity factor (lower levels = higher risk)
        level_weights = {
            "Level 0-1": 1.5,
            "Level 2": 1.3,
            "Level 3": 1.0,
            "Level 3.5": 0.8,
            "Level 4": 0.6,
        }
        level_factor = level_weights.get(ra.asset.purdue_level, 1.0)

        # Network exposure reduction if compensating controls exist
        comp_reduction = 0.8 if ra.compensating_controls else 1.0

        ra.risk_score = round(base * criticality * level_factor * comp_reduction, 1)
        ra.risk_score = min(ra.risk_score, 10.0)

        if ra.risk_score >= 9.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "critical"
            ra.remediation_priority = 1
        elif ra.risk_score >= 7.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "high"
            ra.remediation_priority = 2
        elif ra.risk_score >= 4.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "medium"
            ra.remediation_priority = 3
        else:
            ra.risk_rating = "low"
            ra.remediation_priority = 4

    def generate_report(self):
        """Generate vulnerability assessment report."""
        # Sort by risk score descending
        sorted_ra = sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)

        report = []
        report.append("=" * 70)
        report.append("OT VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT")
        report.append(f"Date: {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
        report.append(f"Assets: {len(self.assets)} | Vulnerabilities: {len(self.vulnerabilities)}")
        report.append(f"Risk Assessments: {len(self.risk_assessments)}")
        report.append("=" * 70)

        for sev in ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]:
            findings = [ra for ra in sorted_ra if ra.risk_rating == sev]
            if findings:
                report.append(f"\n--- {sev.upper()} RISK ({len(findings)}) ---")
                for ra in findings[:10]:
                    report.append(f"\n  Risk Score: {ra.risk_score}/10.0")
                    report.append(f"  Asset: {ra.asset.name} ({ra.asset.vendor} {ra.asset.model})")
                    report.append(f"  Zone: {ra.asset.zone} ({ra.asset.purdue_level})")
                    report.append(f"  CVE: {ra.vulnerability.cve_id} (CVSS: {ra.vulnerability.cvss_score})")
                    report.append(f"  Title: {ra.vulnerability.title}")
                    if ra.vulnerability.patch_available:
                        report.append(f"  Patch: Available - schedule for next maintenance window")
                    else:
                        report.append(f"  Patch: Not available - apply compensating controls")

        return "\n".join(report)

    def export_json(self, output_file):
        """Export assessment to JSON."""
        data = {
            "assessment_date": datetime.now().isoformat(),
            "asset_count": len(self.assets),
            "vulnerability_count": len(self.vulnerabilities),
            "risk_assessments": [
                {
                    "asset_name": ra.asset.name,
                    "asset_ip": ra.asset.ip_address,
                    "cve": ra.vulnerability.cve_id,
                    "risk_score": ra.risk_score,
                    "risk_rating": ra.risk_rating,
                    "priority": ra.remediation_priority,
                }
                for ra in sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)
            ],
        }
        with open(output_file, "w") as f:
            json.dump(data, f, indent=2)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    assessment = OTVulnerabilityAssessment()
    advisories = assessment.fetch_ics_advisories()
    print(f"Fetched {len(advisories)} ICS advisories from CISA KEV catalog")

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Claroty xDomeCyber-physical systems protection platform providing asset discovery, vulnerability management, and threat detection for OT/IoT environments
Passive DiscoveryIdentifying OT assets by analyzing network traffic without sending any packets, safe for production environments
Safe Active QueryQuerying OT devices using native industrial protocols at safe rates to collect detailed asset information without disrupting operations
OT Risk ScoreRisk rating that factors CVSS base score, asset criticality, Purdue level, and compensating controls for OT-appropriate prioritization
ICS-CERT AdvisoryCISA-published security advisories for industrial control system vulnerabilities with vendor-specific remediation guidance
Virtual PatchingDeploying IPS/firewall rules to block exploitation of known vulnerabilities when firmware patches cannot be immediately applied

Tools & Systems

  • Claroty xDome: Comprehensive OT/IoT asset discovery, vulnerability management, and continuous threat detection platform
  • Claroty CTD: Continuous Threat Detection sensor for passive network monitoring in OT environments
  • CISA ICS-CERT: US government advisory service publishing ICS vulnerability notifications and mitigation guidance
  • Dragos Platform: Alternative OT security platform with asset visibility and vulnerability management capabilities
  • Nozomi Networks Guardian: OT monitoring platform with vulnerability correlation and risk scoring

Output Format

OT Vulnerability Assessment Report
=====================================
Tool: Claroty xDome / Manual Assessment
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Assets Scanned: [N]

RISK SUMMARY:
  Critical Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  High Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  Medium Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  Low Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets

TOP RISKS:
  [Risk Score] [CVE-ID] on [Asset Name] ([Zone])
    Remediation: [Patch/Compensating Control]
    Timeline: [Next maintenance window / Immediate]

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Steps

  1. 1Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.735 reviews
  • I
    Isabella GhoshDec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • P
    Pratham WareDec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Z
    Zara RamirezDec 4, 2024

    performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • S
    Sakshi PatilNov 27, 2024

    We added performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • T
    Tariq ChawlaNov 23, 2024

    performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • H
    Hana ThompsonNov 7, 2024

    We added performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • A
    Aisha GonzalezOct 26, 2024

    performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • C
    Chaitanya PatilOct 18, 2024

    performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • I
    Isabella DialloOct 14, 2024

    Registry listing for performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • J
    James JohnsonSep 21, 2024

    performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 35

1 / 4

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.