This skill covers performing vulnerability assessments in OT environments using the Claroty xDome platform for comprehensive asset discovery, risk scoring, vulnerability correlation, and remediation prioritization. It addresses passive vulnerability identification through traffic analysis, active safe querying of OT devices, integration with CVE databases and ICS-CERT advisories, and risk-based prioritization that accounts for operational impact and compensating controls.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-clarotyExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty. Access via /performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty |
| description | 'This skill covers performing vulnerability assessments in OT environments using the Claroty xDome platform for comprehensive asset discovery, risk scoring, vulnerability correlation, and remediation prioritization. It addresses passive vulnerability identification through traffic analysis, active safe querying of OT devices, integration with CVE databases and ICS-CERT advisories, and risk-based prioritization that accounts for operational impact and compensating controls. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | ot-ics-security |
| tags | - ot-security - ics - scada - industrial-control - iec62443 - vulnerability-assessment - claroty |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.IR-01 - DE.CM-01 - ID.AM-05 - GV.OC-02 |
Do not use for active vulnerability scanning of PLCs and safety systems (see performing-ot-network-security-assessment for passive approaches), for IT-only vulnerability management (see standard vulnerability scanners), or for penetration testing (see performing-ics-penetration-testing).
Configure Claroty to perform passive and active-safe discovery to build complete asset inventory with firmware versions for vulnerability correlation.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""OT Vulnerability Assessment Manager.
Correlates OT asset inventory with ICS-CERT advisories and CVE data
to identify, prioritize, and track OT vulnerabilities. Designed to
integrate with Claroty xDome API or standalone operation.
"""
import json
import sys
from collections import defaultdict
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, asdict
from datetime import datetime
import requests
@dataclass
class OTAsset:
asset_id: str
name: str
vendor: str
model: str
firmware_version: str
asset_type: str # PLC, HMI, RTU, historian, switch, etc.
purdue_level: str
ip_address: str
protocol: str
criticality: str # critical, high, medium, low
zone: str
@dataclass
class OTVulnerability:
vuln_id: str
cve_id: str
title: str
severity: str # critical, high, medium, low
cvss_score: float
affected_vendor: str
affected_product: str
affected_versions: str
description: str
ics_cert_advisory: str = ""
remediation: str = ""
patch_available: bool = False
compensating_controls: str = ""
@dataclass
class RiskAssessment:
asset: OTAsset
vulnerability: OTVulnerability
risk_score: float = 0.0
risk_rating: str = ""
exploitability: str = ""
operational_impact: str = ""
compensating_controls: list = field(default_factory=list)
remediation_priority: int = 0
class OTVulnerabilityAssessment:
"""OT vulnerability assessment and prioritization engine."""
def __init__(self):
self.assets = []
self.vulnerabilities = []
self.risk_assessments = []
def load_assets(self, assets_data):
"""Load asset inventory from Claroty export or manual inventory."""
for a in assets_data:
self.assets.append(OTAsset(**a))
print(f"[*] Loaded {len(self.assets)} OT assets")
def fetch_ics_advisories(self):
"""Fetch latest ICS-CERT advisories from CISA."""
print("[*] Fetching ICS-CERT advisories from CISA...")
try:
# CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
url = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
resp = requests.get(url, timeout=30)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
ics_vulns = []
for vuln in data.get("vulnerabilities", []):
# Filter for ICS-relevant vendors
ics_vendors = [
"siemens", "schneider", "rockwell", "honeywell",
"abb", "ge", "emerson", "yokogawa", "omron",
"mitsubishi", "phoenix", "moxa", "advantech",
]
vendor = vuln.get("vendorProject", "").lower()
if any(v in vendor for v in ics_vendors):
ics_vulns.append(vuln)
print(f" Found {len(ics_vulns)} ICS-relevant known exploited vulnerabilities")
return ics_vulns
except Exception as e:
print(f"[WARN] Could not fetch advisories: {e}")
return []
def correlate_vulnerabilities(self):
"""Match vulnerabilities to assets based on vendor/model/firmware."""
print("[*] Correlating vulnerabilities to assets...")
for asset in self.assets:
for vuln in self.vulnerabilities:
if (vuln.affected_vendor.lower() in asset.vendor.lower() and
vuln.affected_product.lower() in asset.model.lower()):
# Check firmware version if specified
ra = RiskAssessment(asset=asset, vulnerability=vuln)
self._calculate_risk_score(ra)
self.risk_assessments.append(ra)
print(f" Correlated {len(self.risk_assessments)} asset-vulnerability pairs")
def _calculate_risk_score(self, ra):
"""Calculate OT-specific risk score considering operational impact."""
# Base score from CVSS
base = ra.vulnerability.cvss_score
# Criticality multiplier based on asset function
criticality_weights = {
"critical": 1.5, # SIS, safety systems
"high": 1.3, # PLCs, primary control
"medium": 1.0, # HMIs, historians
"low": 0.7, # non-critical support systems
}
criticality = criticality_weights.get(ra.asset.criticality, 1.0)
# Purdue level proximity factor (lower levels = higher risk)
level_weights = {
"Level 0-1": 1.5,
"Level 2": 1.3,
"Level 3": 1.0,
"Level 3.5": 0.8,
"Level 4": 0.6,
}
level_factor = level_weights.get(ra.asset.purdue_level, 1.0)
# Network exposure reduction if compensating controls exist
comp_reduction = 0.8 if ra.compensating_controls else 1.0
ra.risk_score = round(base * criticality * level_factor * comp_reduction, 1)
ra.risk_score = min(ra.risk_score, 10.0)
if ra.risk_score >= 9.0:
ra.risk_rating = "critical"
ra.remediation_priority = 1
elif ra.risk_score >= 7.0:
ra.risk_rating = "high"
ra.remediation_priority = 2
elif ra.risk_score >= 4.0:
ra.risk_rating = "medium"
ra.remediation_priority = 3
else:
ra.risk_rating = "low"
ra.remediation_priority = 4
def generate_report(self):
"""Generate vulnerability assessment report."""
# Sort by risk score descending
sorted_ra = sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)
report = []
report.append("=" * 70)
report.append("OT VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT")
report.append(f"Date: {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
report.append(f"Assets: {len(self.assets)} | Vulnerabilities: {len(self.vulnerabilities)}")
report.append(f"Risk Assessments: {len(self.risk_assessments)}")
report.append("=" * 70)
for sev in ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]:
findings = [ra for ra in sorted_ra if ra.risk_rating == sev]
if findings:
report.append(f"\n--- {sev.upper()} RISK ({len(findings)}) ---")
for ra in findings[:10]:
report.append(f"\n Risk Score: {ra.risk_score}/10.0")
report.append(f" Asset: {ra.asset.name} ({ra.asset.vendor} {ra.asset.model})")
report.append(f" Zone: {ra.asset.zone} ({ra.asset.purdue_level})")
report.append(f" CVE: {ra.vulnerability.cve_id} (CVSS: {ra.vulnerability.cvss_score})")
report.append(f" Title: {ra.vulnerability.title}")
if ra.vulnerability.patch_available:
report.append(f" Patch: Available - schedule for next maintenance window")
else:
report.append(f" Patch: Not available - apply compensating controls")
return "\n".join(report)
def export_json(self, output_file):
"""Export assessment to JSON."""
data = {
"assessment_date": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"asset_count": len(self.assets),
"vulnerability_count": len(self.vulnerabilities),
"risk_assessments": [
{
"asset_name": ra.asset.name,
"asset_ip": ra.asset.ip_address,
"cve": ra.vulnerability.cve_id,
"risk_score": ra.risk_score,
"risk_rating": ra.risk_rating,
"priority": ra.remediation_priority,
}
for ra in sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)
],
}
with open(output_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(data, f, indent=2)
if __name__ == "__main__":
assessment = OTVulnerabilityAssessment()
advisories = assessment.fetch_ics_advisories()
print(f"Fetched {len(advisories)} ICS advisories from CISA KEV catalog")
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Claroty xDome | Cyber-physical systems protection platform providing asset discovery, vulnerability management, and threat detection for OT/IoT environments |
| Passive Discovery | Identifying OT assets by analyzing network traffic without sending any packets, safe for production environments |
| Safe Active Query | Querying OT devices using native industrial protocols at safe rates to collect detailed asset information without disrupting operations |
| OT Risk Score | Risk rating that factors CVSS base score, asset criticality, Purdue level, and compensating controls for OT-appropriate prioritization |
| ICS-CERT Advisory | CISA-published security advisories for industrial control system vulnerabilities with vendor-specific remediation guidance |
| Virtual Patching | Deploying IPS/firewall rules to block exploitation of known vulnerabilities when firmware patches cannot be immediately applied |
OT Vulnerability Assessment Report
=====================================
Tool: Claroty xDome / Manual Assessment
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Assets Scanned: [N]
RISK SUMMARY:
Critical Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
High Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
Medium Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
Low Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
TOP RISKS:
[Risk Score] [CVE-ID] on [Asset Name] ([Zone])
Remediation: [Patch/Compensating Control]
Timeline: [Next maintenance window / Immediate]
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 35