performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Assess Active Directory security posture using PingCastle, BloodHound, and Purple Knight to identify misconfigurations, privilege escalation paths, and attack vectors.
| name | performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment |
| description | Assess Active Directory security posture using PingCastle, BloodHound, and Purple Knight to identify misconfigurations, privilege escalation paths, and attack vectors. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | vulnerability-management |
| tags | - active-directory - pingcastle - bloodhound - purple-knight - ad-security - privilege-escalation - ldap - kerberos |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - Restore Object - Network Traffic Policy Mapping - Restore Configuration - Access Modeling - Operational Activity Mapping |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-02 - ID.IM-02 - ID.RA-06 |
Performing Active Directory Vulnerability Assessment
Overview
Active Directory (AD) is the primary identity and access management system in most enterprise environments, making it a critical attack target. This skill covers comprehensive AD security assessment using PingCastle for health checks, BloodHound for attack path analysis, and Purple Knight for security posture scoring. These tools identify misconfigurations, excessive privileges, Kerberos weaknesses, and lateral movement opportunities.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing active directory vulnerability assessment
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Domain-joined workstation or domain admin access for scanning
- PingCastle (https://github.com/netwrix/pingcastle)
- BloodHound Community Edition with SharpHound collector
- Purple Knight from Semperis (free community tool)
- Python 3.9+ for analysis scripts
- .NET Framework 4.7+ for PingCastle on Windows
Tool 1: PingCastle Health Check
Installation and Execution
# Download PingCastle
Invoke-WebRequest -Uri "https://github.com/netwrix/pingcastle/releases/latest/download/PingCastle.zip" `
-OutFile "PingCastle.zip"
Expand-Archive PingCastle.zip -DestinationPath C:\Tools\PingCastle
# Run health check against current domain
cd C:\Tools\PingCastle
.\PingCastle.exe --healthcheck
# Run health check against specific domain
.\PingCastle.exe --healthcheck --server dc01.corp.local --user CORP\scanner_account --password P@ssw0rd
# Run in scanner mode for multiple domains
.\PingCastle.exe --scanner --scannerlp
# Generate consolidated report
.\PingCastle.exe --healthcheck --level Full
PingCastle Scoring Categories
| Category | Description | Risk Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Stale Objects | Inactive accounts, old passwords, obsolete OS | Ghost accounts, expired credentials |
| Privileged Accounts | Excessive admin rights, nested groups | Domain Admin sprawl, SID history |
| Trusts | Forest and domain trust configurations | Transitive trust abuse, SID filtering |
| Anomalies | Security setting deviations | GPO misconfigurations, schema issues |
Key PingCastle Checks
# Critical items to review in PingCastle report:
- Accounts with "Password Never Expires" flag
- Accounts with Kerberos pre-authentication disabled (AS-REP roastable)
- Accounts with Kerberos delegation (unconstrained/constrained)
- Domain Controllers running unsupported OS versions
- AdminSDHolder permission modifications
- Accounts in privileged groups (Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins)
- Trust relationships with SID filtering disabled
- GPO vulnerabilities allowing privilege escalation
Tool 2: BloodHound Attack Path Analysis
SharpHound Data Collection
# Download SharpHound collector
# https://github.com/SpecterOps/BloodHound/tree/main/packages/csharp/SharpHound
# Run SharpHound collection (all methods)
.\SharpHound.exe --collectionmethods All --domain corp.local --zipfilename bloodhound_data.zip
# Stealthy collection (minimal noise)
.\SharpHound.exe --collectionmethods Session,LoggedOn --domain corp.local --stealth
# Collection with specific domain controller
.\SharpHound.exe --collectionmethods All --domain corp.local --domaincontroller dc01.corp.local
# Run via PowerShell
Import-Module .\SharpHound.ps1
Invoke-BloodHound -CollectionMethod All -Domain corp.local -OutputDirectory C:\BH_Data
BloodHound CE Setup
# Deploy BloodHound Community Edition with Docker
curl -L https://ghst.ly/getbhce -o docker-compose.yml
docker compose up -d
# Access BloodHound CE at http://localhost:8080
# Default credentials shown in docker compose logs
# Upload SharpHound data through web UI or API
curl -X POST "http://localhost:8080/api/v2/file-upload/start" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $BH_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"fileName": "bloodhound_data.zip"}'
Critical BloodHound Queries
# Find shortest path to Domain Admin
MATCH p=shortestPath((u:User)-[*1..]->(g:Group {name:"DOMAIN [email protected]"}))
WHERE u.name <> "[email protected]"
RETURN p
# Find Kerberoastable accounts with admin privileges
MATCH (u:User {hasspn:true})-[:MemberOf*1..]->(g:Group)
WHERE g.name CONTAINS "ADMIN"
RETURN u.name, u.serviceprincipalnames
# Find computers where Domain Admins are logged in
MATCH (c:Computer)-[:HasSession]->(u:User)-[:MemberOf*1..]->(g:Group {name:"DOMAIN [email protected]"})
RETURN c.name, u.name
# Find AS-REP roastable accounts
MATCH (u:User {dontreqpreauth:true})
RETURN u.name, u.description
# Find unconstrained delegation hosts
MATCH (c:Computer {unconstraineddelegation:true})
WHERE NOT c.name CONTAINS "DC"
RETURN c.name
# Find GPO abuse paths
MATCH p=(u:User)-[:GenericAll|GenericWrite|WriteOwner|WriteDacl]->(g:GPO)
RETURN p
Tool 3: Purple Knight Assessment
# Download Purple Knight from https://www.purple-knight.com/
# Run as domain admin or with appropriate read permissions
.\PurpleKnight.exe
# Purple Knight checks 130+ security indicators across:
# - Account Security (password policies, privileged accounts)
# - AD Infrastructure (replication, DNS, LDAP signing)
# - Group Policy (GPO permissions, security settings)
# - Kerberos Security (delegation, encryption types, SPN)
# - AD Delegation (AdminSDHolder, OU permissions)
Purple Knight Score Categories
| Score Range | Rating | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent | Maintain current posture |
| 75-89 | Good | Address high-risk findings |
| 60-74 | Fair | Prioritize remediation plan |
| 40-59 | Poor | Immediate remediation required |
| 0-39 | Critical | Emergency response needed |
Common AD Vulnerabilities
1. Kerberoasting Exposure
# Find SPNs assigned to user accounts (Kerberoasting targets)
Get-ADUser -Filter {ServicePrincipalName -ne "$null"} -Properties ServicePrincipalName |
Select-Object Name, ServicePrincipalName, PasswordLastSet, Enabled
2. AS-REP Roasting Exposure
# Find accounts with pre-auth disabled
Get-ADUser -Filter {DoesNotRequirePreAuth -eq $true} -Properties DoesNotRequirePreAuth |
Select-Object Name, DoesNotRequirePreAuth, Enabled
3. LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning Risk
# Check if LLMNR is disabled via GPO
Get-ItemProperty "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows NT\DNSClient" -Name EnableMulticast -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
4. Excessive Privileged Group Membership
# Count members in critical groups
$groups = @("Domain Admins", "Enterprise Admins", "Schema Admins", "Account Operators", "Backup Operators")
foreach ($group in $groups) {
$count = (Get-ADGroupMember -Identity $group -Recursive).Count
Write-Output "$group : $count members"
}
Remediation Priorities
| Finding | Risk | Remediation |
|---|---|---|
| Kerberoastable admin accounts | Critical | Remove SPNs or use MSA/gMSA |
| Unconstrained delegation on non-DCs | Critical | Switch to constrained/RBCD |
| Password Never Expires on admins | High | Enable password rotation policy |
| AS-REP roastable accounts | High | Enable Kerberos pre-authentication |
| AdminSDHolder modification | High | Audit and restore default ACLs |
| Stale computer accounts (90+ days) | Medium | Disable and move to quarantine OU |
| LDAP signing not enforced | Medium | Enable via GPO on all DCs |
References
How to use performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★66 reviews- ★★★★★Liam Sanchez· Dec 28, 2024
performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Michael Shah· Dec 24, 2024
performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Emma Park· Dec 20, 2024
performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Michael White· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Liam Thompson· Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kaira Thomas· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mei Smith· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Tariq Huang· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Michael Srinivasan· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Luis Rao· Oct 26, 2024
performing-active-directory-vulnerability-assessment is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 66