Investigate Active Directory compromise by analyzing authentication logs, replication metadata, Group Policy changes, and Kerberos ticket anomalies to identify attacker persistence and lateral movement paths.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation. Access via /performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation |
| description | Investigate Active Directory compromise by analyzing authentication logs, replication metadata, Group Policy changes, and Kerberos ticket anomalies to identify attacker persistence and lateral movement paths. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - active-directory - compromise-investigation - identity-forensics - kerberos - lateral-movement - dfir - ntds-dit - golden-ticket |
| mitre_attack | - T1003 - T1558 - T1021 - T1078 - T1484 |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - Application Protocol Command Analysis - Network Isolation - Network Traffic Analysis - Client-server Payload Profiling - Platform Monitoring |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Active Directory (AD) compromise investigation is a critical incident response capability that focuses on identifying how attackers gained access to domain services, what persistence mechanisms they established, and the scope of credential compromise. Since 88% of breaches involve compromised credentials (Verizon 2025 DBIR), AD is the primary target for enterprise-wide attacks. Investigators must analyze NTDS.dit database integrity, Kerberos ticket-granting activity, Group Policy modifications, replication metadata, and privileged group membership changes to reconstruct the attack chain and determine full compromise scope.
The NTDS.dit file is the core Active Directory credential database containing all password hashes for domain accounts. Attackers commonly exfiltrate this file using tools like ntdsutil, secretsdump.py, or DCSync attacks via Mimikatz.
Detection indicators:
Golden Ticket indicators:
Silver Ticket indicators:
Kerberoasting indicators:
Track modifications to these critical groups:
1. Identify potentially compromised domain controllers
2. Collect Security, System, Directory Service event logs
3. Extract AD replication metadata using repadmin
4. Capture ntdsutil snapshots for offline analysis
5. Collect DNS server logs and zone transfer records
6. Export Group Policy Object configurations
7. Document current privileged group memberships
1. Parse Event ID 4624/4625 for logon patterns
2. Identify pass-the-hash indicators (Event ID 4624 Type 3 with NTLM)
3. Analyze Event ID 4768/4769/4771 for Kerberos anomalies
4. Review Event ID 4776 for NTLM authentication failures
5. Cross-reference logon events with known compromised accounts
6. Map lateral movement paths through authentication chains
1. Enumerate AdminSDHolder ACL modifications
2. Check for SID History abuse on accounts
3. Verify krbtgt account password age
4. Audit DSRM password configuration
5. Check for skeleton key malware indicators
6. Review AD Certificate Services for rogue certificates
7. Validate DNS records for poisoning
1. Double-rotate krbtgt password (wait replication between rotations)
2. Reset all compromised account passwords
3. Remove unauthorized privileged group members
4. Revoke rogue certificates if AD CS compromised
5. Rebuild domain controllers from clean media if needed
6. Implement tiered administration model
7. Enable Protected Users group for privileged accounts
| Event ID | Source | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4624 | Security | Successful logon |
| 4625 | Security | Failed logon |
| 4648 | Security | Explicit credential logon |
| 4662 | Security | Operation on AD object |
| 4768 | Security | Kerberos TGT requested |
| 4769 | Security | Kerberos service ticket requested |
| 4771 | Security | Kerberos pre-authentication failed |
| 4776 | Security | NTLM credential validation |
| 5136 | Security | Directory object modified |
| 5137 | Security | Directory object created |
| 4706 | Security | Trust created |
| 4707 | Security | Trust removed |
| 4742 | Security | Computer account changed |
| 8222 | System | Shadow copy created |
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| BloodHound | Attack path mapping and privilege escalation analysis |
| Pingcastle | AD security assessment and risk scoring |
| Purple Knight | AD vulnerability scanning by Semperis |
| ADRecon | Active Directory data gathering |
| Mimikatz | Credential extraction and Kerberos analysis |
| Impacket | DCSync detection and NTLM relay analysis |
| Velociraptor | Remote forensic artifact collection |
| Timeline Explorer | Event log timeline analysis |
| Technique | ID | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| DCSync | T1003.006 | NTDS.dit credential extraction |
| Golden Ticket | T1558.001 | Kerberos TGT forgery |
| Silver Ticket | T1558.002 | Service ticket forgery |
| Kerberoasting | T1558.003 | Service account hash extraction |
| Pass-the-Hash | T1550.002 | NTLM hash reuse |
| Group Policy Modification | T1484.001 | Persistence via GPO |
| Account Manipulation | T1098 | Privileged group changes |
| SID-History Injection | T1134.005 | Privilege escalation |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Keeps context tight: performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Keeps context tight: performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 27