investigating-insider-threat-indicators▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR data correlation. Use when SOC teams receive insider threat referrals from HR, detect anomalous data movement by employees, or need to build investigation timelines for potential insider threats.
| name | investigating-insider-threat-indicators |
| description | 'Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR data correlation. Use when SOC teams receive insider threat referrals from HR, detect anomalous data movement by employees, or need to build investigation timelines for potential insider threats. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - insider-threat - data-exfiltration - dlp - ueba - investigation - hr-correlation |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Investigating Insider Threat Indicators
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- HR refers a departing employee for monitoring during their notice period
- DLP alerts indicate bulk data downloads or transfers to personal storage
- UEBA detects anomalous access patterns deviating significantly from peer baselines
- Management reports concerns about an employee accessing sensitive data outside their role
Do not use without proper legal authorization — insider threat investigations must be coordinated with HR, Legal, and Privacy teams before monitoring begins.
Prerequisites
- Legal authorization and HR referral documenting investigation justification
- SIEM with DLP, endpoint, email, proxy, and authentication log sources
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP) system (Microsoft Purview, Symantec, Forcepoint) with policy alerts
- Endpoint monitoring capability (EDR with USB/removable media logging)
- HR data feed providing employment status, notice dates, and access entitlements
- Chain of custody procedures for evidence preservation
Workflow
Step 1: Establish Investigation Scope and Legal Authorization
Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:
INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION AUTHORIZATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Case ID: IT-2024-0089
Subject: [Employee Name] — [Department]
Authorized By: [CISO / General Counsel]
Referral Source: HR — Employee submitted resignation, 2-week notice
Justification: Employee has access to trade secrets and customer PII
Scope: Email, file access, USB, cloud storage, printing
Duration: 2024-03-15 to 2024-03-29 (notice period)
Privacy Review: Completed — compliant with acceptable use policy
Step 2: Build Activity Timeline from SIEM
Query comprehensive activity for the subject:
index=* (user="jsmith" OR src_user="jsmith" OR sender="[email protected]"
OR SubjectUserName="jsmith")
earliest="2024-03-01" latest=now
| eval event_category = case(
sourcetype LIKE "%dlp%", "DLP",
sourcetype LIKE "%proxy%", "Web Access",
sourcetype LIKE "%email%", "Email",
sourcetype LIKE "%WinEventLog%", "Endpoint",
sourcetype LIKE "%o365%", "Cloud",
sourcetype LIKE "%vpn%", "VPN",
sourcetype LIKE "%badge%", "Physical Access",
1=1, sourcetype
)
| stats count by event_category, sourcetype, _time
| timechart span=1d count by event_category
Step 3: Detect Data Exfiltration Indicators
Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):
index=o365 sourcetype="o365:management:activity" Operation IN ("FileDownloaded", "FileSynced")
UserId="[email protected]" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS downloads, sum(eval(if(isnotnull(FileSize), FileSize, 0))) AS total_bytes,
dc(SourceFileName) AS unique_files
by UserId, SiteUrl, _time
| bin _time span=1d
| eval total_gb = round(total_bytes / 1073741824, 2)
| where downloads > 50 OR total_gb > 1
| sort - total_gb
USB/Removable Media Usage:
index=sysmon EventCode=1 Computer="WORKSTATION-JSMITH"
(CommandLine="*removable*" OR CommandLine="*usb*"
OR Image="*\\xcopy*" OR Image="*\\robocopy*")
| table _time, Computer, User, Image, CommandLine
| append [
search index=endpoint sourcetype="endpoint:device_connect"
user="jsmith" device_type="removable"
| table _time, user, device_name, device_serial, action
]
| sort _time
Email-Based Exfiltration:
index=email sourcetype="o365:messageTrace"
SenderAddress="[email protected]"
| eval is_external = if(match(RecipientAddress, "@company\.com$"), 0, 1)
| eval has_attachment = if(isnotnull(AttachmentName), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total_emails,
sum(is_external) AS external_emails,
sum(has_attachment) AS with_attachments,
sum(eval(if(is_external=1 AND has_attachment=1, 1, 0))) AS external_with_attach,
sum(Size) AS total_size_bytes
by SenderAddress
| eval external_attach_pct = round(external_with_attach / total_emails * 100, 1)
| eval total_size_mb = round(total_size_bytes / 1048576, 1)
Cloud Storage Upload Detection:
index=proxy user="jsmith"
(dest IN ("*dropbox.com", "*drive.google.com", "*onedrive.live.com",
"*box.com", "*wetransfer.com", "*mega.nz")
OR category="cloud-storage")
http_method=POST
| stats count AS uploads, sum(bytes_out) AS total_uploaded
by user, dest, category
| eval uploaded_mb = round(total_uploaded / 1048576, 1)
| sort - uploaded_mb
Step 4: Analyze Access Pattern Anomalies
Accessing Sensitive Systems Outside Normal Scope:
index=auth user="jsmith" action=success earliest=-30d
| stats dc(app) AS unique_apps, values(app) AS apps_accessed by user
| join user type=left [
| inputlookup role_app_mapping.csv
| search role="Financial Analyst"
| stats values(authorized_app) AS authorized_apps by role
| eval user="jsmith"
]
| eval unauthorized = mvfilter(NOT match(apps_accessed, mvjoin(authorized_apps, "|")))
| where isnotnull(unauthorized)
| table user, unauthorized, authorized_apps
After-Hours and Weekend Activity:
index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| eval hour = tonumber(strftime(_time, "%H"))
| eval is_offhours = if(hour < 7 OR hour > 19, 1, 0)
| eval day = strftime(_time, "%A")
| eval is_weekend = if(day IN ("Saturday", "Sunday"), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total, sum(is_offhours) AS offhours, sum(is_weekend) AS weekend by user
| eval offhours_pct = round(offhours / total * 100, 1)
| eval weekend_pct = round(weekend / total * 100, 1)
Step 5: Correlate with HR and Physical Security Data
Compare activity to resignation timeline:
| makeresults
| eval user="jsmith",
resignation_date="2024-03-15",
last_day="2024-03-29",
access_revocation="2024-03-29 17:00"
| join user [
search index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-90d
| bin _time span=1d
| stats count AS daily_events, dc(sourcetype) AS data_sources by user, _time
]
| eval phase = case(
_time < relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "Normal (Pre-Resignation)",
_time >= strptime(resignation_date, "%Y-%m-%d") AND _time <= strptime(last_day, "%Y-%m-%d"),
"Notice Period",
1=1, "Transition"
)
| chart avg(daily_events) AS avg_events by phase
Badge/Physical Access Correlation:
index=badge_access employee_id="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS badge_events, values(door_name) AS doors_accessed,
earliest(_time) AS first_badge, latest(_time) AS last_badge by employee_id
| eval areas = mvcount(doors_accessed)
Step 6: Preserve Evidence and Document Findings
Maintain chain of custody for all collected evidence:
import hashlib
import json
from datetime import datetime
evidence_log = {
"case_id": "IT-2024-0089",
"investigator": "soc_analyst_tier2",
"collection_time": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"items": [
{
"item_id": "EV-001",
"description": "Splunk export — all user activity 2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15",
"file": "jsmith_activity_export.csv",
"sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("jsmith_activity_export.csv", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
"collected_by": "analyst_doe",
"collection_method": "Splunk search export"
},
{
"item_id": "EV-002",
"description": "DLP alert details — 47 policy violations",
"file": "dlp_alerts_jsmith.json",
"sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("dlp_alerts_jsmith.json", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
"collected_by": "analyst_doe",
"collection_method": "Microsoft Purview export"
}
]
}
with open(f"evidence_log_{evidence_log['case_id']}.json", "w") as f:
json.dump(evidence_log, f, indent=2)
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Insider Threat | Risk posed by individuals with legitimate access who misuse it for unauthorized purposes |
| Data Exfiltration | Unauthorized transfer of data outside the organization via email, USB, cloud, or other channels |
| DLP | Data Loss Prevention — technology monitoring and blocking unauthorized data transfers based on content policies |
| Notice Period Monitoring | Enhanced surveillance of departing employees during their resignation-to-departure window |
| Chain of Custody | Documented evidence handling procedures ensuring forensic integrity for potential legal proceedings |
| Need-to-Know Violation | Accessing information or systems beyond what is required for an employee's role or current tasks |
Tools & Systems
- Microsoft Purview (formerly DLP): Data classification and loss prevention platform monitoring endpoints, email, and cloud storage
- Splunk UBA: User behavior analytics detecting insider threat patterns through ML-based anomaly detection
- Forcepoint Insider Threat: Dedicated insider threat detection platform with behavioral indicators and risk scoring
- DTEX InTERCEPT: Endpoint-based insider threat detection focusing on user activity metadata collection
- Code42 Incydr: Data risk detection platform specializing in file exfiltration monitoring across endpoints and cloud
Common Scenarios
- Departing Employee: Bulk download of customer lists and product roadmaps during two-week notice period
- Disgruntled Employee: After negative performance review, employee accesses executive salary data outside their role
- Contractor Overreach: External consultant accessing systems beyond contracted scope, downloading source code
- Account Misuse: Employee sharing credentials with unauthorized third party for competitive intelligence
- Sabotage Indicator: IT admin creating backdoor accounts and modifying system configurations before departure
Output Format
INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION REPORT — IT-2024-0089
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Subject: jsmith (Financial Analyst, Finance Dept)
Period: 2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15
Status: Employee resigned 2024-03-15, last day 2024-03-29
Key Findings:
[HIGH] 3,847 files downloaded from SharePoint (12.4 GB) — 10x peer average
[HIGH] USB device connected 14 times during notice period (0 times prior month)
[HIGH] 187 emails with attachments sent to personal Gmail
[MEDIUM] After-hours activity increased 340% during notice period
[MEDIUM] Accessed HR salary database 3 times (not authorized for role)
Timeline:
Mar 01-14: Normal activity baseline (avg 150 events/day)
Mar 15: Resignation submitted (activity spike to 890 events)
Mar 16-17: Weekend access — 2,100 SharePoint downloads
Mar 18: USB device first connected, DLP alert triggered
Evidence Collected: 4 items (SHA-256 verified, chain of custody documented)
Recommendation: Immediate access revocation recommended
Evidence package prepared for Legal review
How to use investigating-insider-threat-indicators on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add investigating-insider-threat-indicators
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches investigating-insider-threat-indicators from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate investigating-insider-threat-indicators. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /investigating-insider-threat-indicators) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★53 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024
investigating-insider-threat-indicators reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Xiao Kapoor· Dec 24, 2024
We added investigating-insider-threat-indicators from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Neel Chen· Dec 20, 2024
investigating-insider-threat-indicators is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Alexander Bhatia· Dec 20, 2024
investigating-insider-threat-indicators fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: investigating-insider-threat-indicators is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend investigating-insider-threat-indicators for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Camila Brown· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: investigating-insider-threat-indicators is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Zara Martin· Nov 11, 2024
investigating-insider-threat-indicators has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Hana Jackson· Oct 18, 2024
We added investigating-insider-threat-indicators from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024
Useful defaults in investigating-insider-threat-indicators — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 53