Patch management is the systematic process of identifying, testing, deploying, and verifying software updates to remediate vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure. An effective patc
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionimplementing-patch-management-workflowExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches implementing-patch-management-workflow from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate implementing-patch-management-workflow. Access via /implementing-patch-management-workflow in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | implementing-patch-management-workflow |
| description | Patch management is the systematic process of identifying, testing, deploying, and verifying software updates to remediate vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure. An effective patc |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | vulnerability-management |
| tags | - vulnerability-management - patch-management - wsus - sccm - ansible - risk |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-02 - ID.IM-02 - ID.RA-06 |
Patch management is the systematic process of identifying, testing, deploying, and verifying software updates to remediate vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure. An effective patch management workflow reduces the attack surface while minimizing operational disruption through structured testing, approval gates, and phased rollouts.
| Ring | Environment | % of Fleet | Soak Time | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 0 | Lab/Test | N/A | 24-48 hrs | Functional validation |
| Ring 1 | IT Early Adopters | 5% | 48-72 hrs | Real-world pilot |
| Ring 2 | Business Pilot | 15% | 5-7 days | Broader compatibility |
| Ring 3 | General Deployment | 50% | 7-14 days | Main rollout |
| Ring 4 | Mission Critical | 30% | After Ring 3 | Final deployment |
# WSUS (Windows Server Update Services)
# Configure WSUS server to sync with Microsoft Update
# Via PowerShell on WSUS server:
Install-WindowsFeature -Name UpdateServices -IncludeManagementTools
& "C:\Program Files\Update Services\Tools\WsusUtil.exe" postinstall CONTENT_DIR=D:\WSUS
# Configure GPO for WSUS clients
# Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Update
# Specify intranet Microsoft update service location: http://wsus-server:8530
# Ansible: Configure patch repositories for Linux
# roles/patch-management/tasks/configure_repos.yml
---
- name: Configure RHEL patch repository
yum_repository:
name: rhel-patches
description: RHEL Security Patches
baseurl: https://satellite.corp.local/pulp/repos/patches
gpgcheck: yes
gpgkey: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat-release
enabled: yes
- name: Configure Ubuntu patch sources
apt_repository:
repo: "deb https://apt-mirror.corp.local/ubuntu {{ ansible_distribution_release }}-security main"
state: present
when: ansible_os_family == "Debian"
# patch_assessment.py - Correlate vulnerability scans with available patches
import subprocess
import platform
import json
def get_windows_pending_patches():
"""Query Windows Update for pending patches via PowerShell."""
ps_cmd = """
$Session = New-Object -ComObject Microsoft.Update.Session
$Searcher = $Session.CreateUpdateSearcher()
$Results = $Searcher.Search("IsInstalled=0 AND Type='Software'")
$Results.Updates | ForEach-Object {
[PSCustomObject]@{
Title = $_.Title
KB = ($_.KBArticleIDs -join ',')
Severity = $_.MsrcSeverity
Size = [math]::Round($_.MaxDownloadSize / 1MB, 2)
Published = $_.LastDeploymentChangeTime.ToString('yyyy-MM-dd')
CVE = ($_.CveIDs -join ',')
}
} | ConvertTo-Json
"""
result = subprocess.run(
["powershell", "-Command", ps_cmd],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=120
)
return json.loads(result.stdout) if result.stdout.strip() else []
def get_linux_pending_patches():
"""Query package manager for available security updates."""
if platform.system() != "Linux":
return []
# Try apt (Debian/Ubuntu)
try:
result = subprocess.run(
["apt", "list", "--upgradable"],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=60
)
packages = []
for line in result.stdout.strip().split("\n")[1:]:
if line:
parts = line.split("/")
packages.append({
"package": parts[0],
"available_version": parts[1].split()[0] if len(parts) > 1 else "",
"source": "apt"
})
return packages
except FileNotFoundError:
pass
# Try yum/dnf (RHEL/CentOS)
try:
result = subprocess.run(
["dnf", "updateinfo", "list", "security", "--available"],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=60
)
packages = []
for line in result.stdout.strip().split("\n"):
parts = line.split()
if len(parts) >= 3:
packages.append({
"advisory": parts[0],
"severity": parts[1],
"package": parts[2],
"source": "dnf"
})
return packages
except FileNotFoundError:
return []
# Ansible playbook: test_patches.yml
---
- name: Test Patches in Lab Environment
hosts: test_servers
become: yes
vars:
rollback_snapshot: "pre-patch-{{ ansible_date_time.date }}"
tasks:
- name: Create VM snapshot before patching
community.vmware.vmware_guest_snapshot:
hostname: "{{ vcenter_host }}"
username: "{{ vcenter_user }}"
password: "{{ vcenter_pass }}"
datacenter: "{{ datacenter }}"
name: "{{ inventory_hostname }}"
snapshot_name: "{{ rollback_snapshot }}"
state: present
delegate_to: localhost
- name: Apply security patches (RHEL/CentOS)
dnf:
name: "*"
state: latest
security: yes
update_cache: yes
when: ansible_os_family == "RedHat"
register: patch_result
- name: Apply security patches (Ubuntu/Debian)
apt:
upgrade: dist
update_cache: yes
only_upgrade: yes
when: ansible_os_family == "Debian"
register: patch_result
- name: Reboot if required
reboot:
reboot_timeout: 600
msg: "Rebooting for patch installation"
when: patch_result.changed
- name: Run post-patch validation
include_tasks: validate_services.yml
- name: Report patch results
debug:
msg: "Patching {{ 'succeeded' if patch_result.changed else 'no updates' }} on {{ inventory_hostname }}"
# deploy_patches.yml - Phased production rollout
---
- name: Ring 1 - IT Early Adopters
hosts: ring1_hosts
serial: "25%"
max_fail_percentage: 10
become: yes
tasks:
- import_tasks: apply_patches.yml
- import_tasks: validate_services.yml
- name: Wait for soak period
pause:
hours: 48
run_once: true
- name: Ring 2 - Business Pilot
hosts: ring2_hosts
serial: "20%"
max_fail_percentage: 5
become: yes
tasks:
- import_tasks: apply_patches.yml
- import_tasks: validate_services.yml
- name: Ring 3 - General Deployment
hosts: ring3_hosts
serial: "10%"
max_fail_percentage: 3
become: yes
tasks:
- import_tasks: apply_patches.yml
- import_tasks: validate_services.yml
Run a post-patch vulnerability scan to confirm patch installation:
# Trigger post-patch verification scan
curl -k -X POST "https://nessus:8834/scans/$VERIFY_SCAN_ID/launch" \
-H "X-Cookie: token=$TOKEN"
# Compare pre-patch and post-patch results
# Expecting reduction in vulnerabilities matching deployed patches
| Severity | SLA (Internet-Facing) | SLA (Internal) | SLA (Air-Gapped) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical (CVSS 9+) | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days |
| High (CVSS 7-8.9) | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
| Medium (CVSS 4-6.9) | 30 days | 30 days | 60 days |
| Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9) | 90 days | 90 days | 90 days |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Useful defaults in implementing-patch-management-workflow — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend implementing-patch-management-workflow for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: implementing-patch-management-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added implementing-patch-management-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
implementing-patch-management-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
implementing-patch-management-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
implementing-patch-management-workflow has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
implementing-patch-management-workflow reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend implementing-patch-management-workflow for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in implementing-patch-management-workflow — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 60